Skip to content

Uttaranchal Court July 2003 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 11 2003

Rajendra Prasad Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court: Uttaranchal

Decided on: Jul-11-2003

Reported in: AIR2004Utr6; 2004(1)AWC913(UHC)

ORDERRajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri K. S. Verma for the petitioner arid Sri Nanak Chand Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner inter alia challenging the judgment and order dated 23-9-2002 and 10-4-2003 passed by the Collector, Hardwar as well as by the Naib Tehsildar, Lakshar, District Hardwar who has been impleaded as respondent Nos. 2 and 3 respectively.3. The facts leading to the present writ petition are that one Govind Sahai son of Chiranji Lal was the owner of Khasara No. 1'31/32 situated in Mauja Laksari Paragna Manglaur Tehsil Laksar, District Hardwar. It was alleged by the petitioner that on 1-6-1959 Govind Sahay executed a Will in favour of Lekhraj, father of the petitioner. Lekhraj died on 11-1-1991 and the land in question was mutated in favour of the petitioner and his three brothers. On 20-12-2000 order was passed regarding mutation by the Naib Tehsildar in th...


Jul 11 2003

Narendra Singh and ors. Vs. Addl. S.D.M. and ors.

Court: Uttaranchal

Decided on: Jul-11-2003

Reported in: 2004CriLJ751

ORDERRajesh Tandon, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Ji Srivastava for the petitioner and Sri N.C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the State.2. This writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment and order dated 3-6-2003 passed by the Additional S.D.M. Dehradun, respondent No. 1.The brief facts rise to this writ petition are that proceedings under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. was initiated by S.D.M, Dehradun in respect of Khasara Nos. 691 and 692 situated at village Kurkawala, Pargana Parvadun, District Dehradun and Khasara plot No. 955 situated in village Madhowala, Pargana Parvadoon, District Dehradun. The Station Officer, Police Station Doewala, Dehradun submitted his report before the S.D.M. on 16-1-1997 on the basis of which preliminary order was passed by S.D.M. and thereafter on 29-1-1997 property in dispute was attached under Section 146, Cr.P.C. On 4-2-1997 the said property was given in the superdagi of one Jamil Ahamad.3. It appea...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial