Uttaranchal Court April 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Kumar Vs. Jai Prakash Kothari and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Apr-19-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Utr14
ORDERM.M. Ghidiyal, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 24-9-2002 passed by the District Judge, Tehri Garhwal.2. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit before Civil Judge (Senior Division). Tehri Garhwal for perpetual injunction against the defendants-respondents restraining them from making any further construction and for removal of existing constructions over the roof of the shop in pursuant to me resolution No. 9 dated 22-10-2001 of Nagar Panchayat, Muni-Ki-Reti, district Tehri Garhwal. According to the petitioner he was granted permission to construct his shop at parking stand Muni-Ki-Reti on some premium and Rs. 300/- per month as rent by the Nagar Panchayat Muni-Ki-Reti by rent-note dated 8-3-2001.3. The petitioner constructed a shop and is running garment business therein. On 29-5-2001 the petitioner applied to defendant-respondent to grant lease of the ...
Balbir Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Apr-08-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ1169
ORDERIrshad Hussain, J.1. The present criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal (hereinafter for short 'Code') has been filed for quashing the criminal proceedings in criminal case. No. 56 of 2001 after setting aside the summoning order dated 16-11-2001 passed by I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardwar and also judgment and order dated 29-4-2002 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hardwar in criminal revision No. 20 of 2002.2. Heard Sri K.S. Verma, learned counsel for applicants and Sri Lok Pal Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for State.3. Respondent No. 2 complainant filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code before the learned Magistrate alleging that on 23-8-2001 at about 11 a.m., eight accused named therein and who are the petitioners in the present petition trespassed into his agricultural plot and assaulted him. Out of these eight, one Suresh Kumar gave a knife blow and another named as Rajbeer fire...
Kishore Kharola Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2486
ORDERIrshad Hussain, J. 1. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter for short 'Code') has been filed for quashing of the proceedings in criminal case No. 99 of 2000, under Sections 406/409 of IPC pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Purola, Uttarkashi.2. Above mentioned case was registered on filing of charge-sheet No. 31 of 1999, arising out of first information report No. 27 of 1999 lodged by complainant Rupendra Nath Misra, Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Uttarkashi, It was alleged that under the D.R.D.A. scheme a non-government organization in the name and style 'Himalaya Industrial Training Institute', Joshiyara, police station, Uttarkashi was sanctioned sum of Rs. 2.05 lacs to undertake various words under Jawahar Rojgar Yojana in the year 1998. Verification of the work was carried out in the month of February, 1999 and meanwhile it was found that the organization neither paid the wages to the labourers emp...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›