Skip to content


Uttaranchal Court December 2002 Judgments Home Cases Uttaranchal 2002 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.002 seconds)

Dec 17 2002 (HC)

Rashtriya Inter College Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC845(UHC)

M. M. Ghildiyal, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the Management of Rashtriya Inter College, Bhalsavagaz, Haridwar (for the short 'College') challenging the order dated 17.9.2002, Annexure-8 to the petition passed by the District Inspector of Schools, Haridwar (for the short D.I.O.S.) treating the suspension order Inoperative. The reason given in the order is that more than sixty days have passed from the date of suspension of the Principal as such the suspension will not be in force and further that in spite of the letter of the D.I.O.S. dated 11.9.2002 seeking clarification from the Management of the school on certain points in respect of the suspension of the Head of the institution, the Management has not replied.2. The facts of the case are that the Committee of the Management passed a resolution on 29.6.2002 placing respondent No. 3 under suspension for serious charges against him. The resolution was forwarded vide letter dated 1.7.2002 to the D.I.O.S. under Section 16...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2002 (HC)

Ravi Dhingra and ors. Vs. Judge, Small Causes/A.D.J.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC844(UHC)

M.M. Ghildiyal, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Vashistha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Alok Singh learned counsel who appeared for the landlord.2. The petition has been filed by the tenant challenging the order dated 20.11.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court, I, Dehradun acting as Judge ; Small Cause Court rejecting the application 15 Ga filed by the tenant.3. The landlord filed small cause suit for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent in the year 1999. Since the suit was pending and ; not decided, the matter went to the High Court and the High Court on 7.8.2001 directed the Small Cause Court to decide the suit within two months. Thereafter the tenant moved an application for amendment, which was allowed by the court below on the same day, i.e., on 7.11.2002. The tenant thereafter moved an application with a prayer to decide the Issue 'Whether Act No. XIII of 1972 is applicable to the disputed property?' as preliminary Issue. The application of the te...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //