Uttaranchal Court November 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sheela Devi Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Nov-19-2001
Reported in: [2002(94)FLR826]; (2002)IVLLJ49UC
P.C. Verma, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation and to pay her regular salary as is being paid to the regular employees of the Department. The similar grievance raised by the other daily wager employees of the Forest Department was considered by the High Court, Allahabad, in which the High Court, Allahabad directed the department to frame a scheme for regularisation of daily wagers, against which the State of Uttar Pradesh approached the Hon'ble Apex Court. The Hon'ble Apex Court passed the following order:-'In the course of hearing of these appeals filed by the State of U. P. as well as the State of Uttaranchal, the main grievance appears to be the direction of the High Court directing framing of a scheme for regularisation of all daily-wagers/muster roll employees irrespective of the fact whether they are in Government or under any scheme. It appears t...
Uma Shankar and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Nov-06-2001
Reported in: (2002)1UPLBEC11
P.C. Verma, J. 1. All the above writ petitions raise the same grievance. Therefore, they are being disposed of by this common Judgment.2. Writs of mandamus have been sought to command the State of Uttaranchal to appoint the petitioners on the posts against which they have been selected by the U.P. Public Service Commission prior to the appointed day.3. Writs of certiorari have been sought by the petitioners in some of writ petitions to quash the Govt. Order dated 29.8.2001 issued by the State of Uttaranchal not to give appointment to the candidates on the basis of recommendations of Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission in various departments of the State of Uttaranchal.4. Various posts which were to be filled up under the Hill Sub Cadre Rules, 1992, by the erstwhile State of Uttar Pradesh were advertised on various dates much prior to the appointed day even when there was no decision to create the State of Uttaranchal. In response to the advertisements, the petitioners applied for a...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›