Us Supreme Court Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United States Vs. Home Concrete and Supply, Llc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
United States v. Home Concrete & Supply, LLC NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus UNITED STATES v. HOME CONCRETE & SUPPLY, LLC, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit No. 11139.Argued January 17, 2012Decided April 25, 2012 Ordinarily, the Government must assess a deficiency against a tax- payer within 3 years after the return was filed, 26 U. S. C. 6501(a), but that period is extended to 6 years when a taxpayer omits from gross income an amount properly includible therein which is in excess of 25 percent of the amount of gross income stated in the return, 6501(e)(1)...
Wood Vs. Milyard
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-24-2012
Wood v. Milyard NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus WOOD v. MILYARD, WARDEN, et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit No. 109995.Argued February 27, 2012Decided April 24, 2012 In 1987, petitioner Patrick Wood was convicted of murder and other crimes by a Colorado court and sentenced to life imprisonment. Wood filed a federal habeas petition in 2008. After receiving Woods petition, the U. S. District Court asked the State if it planned to argue that the petition was untimely. In response, the State twice informed the District Court that it would not challenge, but [was] not co...
Mohamad Vs. Palestinian Authority
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-2012
Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus MOHAMAD, individually and for ESTATE OF RAHIM, DECEASED, et al. v. PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit No. 1188.Argued February 28, 2012Decided April 18, 2012 While visiting the West Bank, Azzam Rahim, a naturalized United States citizen, allegedly was arrested by Palestinian Authority intelligence officers, imprisoned, tortured, and ultimately killed. Rahims relatives, petitioners here, sued the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian Liberation Organization under...
Kappos Vs. Hyatt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-2012
Kappos v. Hyatt NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. HYATT certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit No. 101219.Argued January 9, 2012Decided April 18, 2012 Under the Patent Act of 1952, if a Patent and Trade Office (PTO) examiner denies a patent application, 35 U. S. C. 131, the applicant may file an administrative appeal with the PTOs Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, 134. If the Board also denies the application, the applicant may appeal directly to the Court of App...
Filarsky Vs. Delia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Filarsky v. Delia NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FILARSKY v. DELIA certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 101018.Argued January 17, 2012Decided April 17, 2012 Respondent Delia, a firefighter employed by the City of Rialto, California, missed work after becoming ill on the job. Suspicious of Delias extended absence, the City hired a private investigation firm to conduct surveillance on him. When Delia was seen buying fiberglass insulation and other building supplies, the City initiated an internal affairs investigation. It hired petitioner Filarsky, a private attorney, to ...
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. Vs. Novo Nordisk a/S
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-2012
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD., et al. v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the federal circuit No. 10844.Argued December 5, 2011Decided April 17, 2012 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the manufacture, sale, and labeling of prescription drugs. A brand-name drug manufacturer seeking FDA approval for a drug submits a new drug application (NDA) containing, among other things, a statement of the drugs components and proposed labeling describing the uses...
Florence Vs. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-2012
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus FLORENCE v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit No. 10945.Argued October 12, 2011Decided April 2, 2012 Petitioner was arrested during a traffic stop by a New Jersey state trooper who checked a statewide computer database and found a bench warrant issued for petitioners arrest after he failed to appear at a hearing to enforce a fine. He was initially detained in the Burlington County Detention Center and later in the Essex...
Rehberg Vs. Paulk
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-2012
Rehberg v. Paulk NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus REHBERG v. PAULK certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 10788.Argued November 1, 2011Decided April 2, 2012 Respondent, the chief investigator for a district attorneys office, testified at grand jury proceedings that resulted in petitioners indictment. After the indictments were dismissed, petitioner brought an action under 42 U. S. C. 1983, alleging that respondent had conspired to present and did present false testimony to the grand jury. The Federal District Court denied respondents motion to dismiss on immunity grounds...
Vasquez Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-2012
Vasquez v. United States - 11-199 (2012) NOTICE:This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports.Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 11199 _________________ ALEXANDER VASQUEZ, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit [April 2, 2012] Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›