Us Supreme Court Court March 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raymond B. Yates, M. D., P. C. Profit Sharing Plan Vs. Hendon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-2004
Raymond B. Yates, M. D., P. C. Profit Sharing Plan v. Hendon - 02-458 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2003 RAYMOND B. YATES, M.D., P.C. PROFIT SHARINGPLAN V. HENDON SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RAYMOND B. YATES, M. D., P. C. PROFIT SHARING PLAN et al. v. HENDON, TRUSTEE certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit No. 02458. Argued January 13, 2004Decided March 2, 2004 Enacted to protect the interests of participants in employee benefit plans and their beneficiaries, 29 U. S. C. 1001(b), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) comprises four titles. Relevant here, Title I, 29 U. S. C. 1001 et seq ., mandates minimum participation, vesting, and funding schedules for covered pension plans, and establishes fiduciary conduct standards for plan administrators. Title II, codified in 26 U. S. C., amended various Internal Revenue Code (IRC) provisions pertaining to qualification of pension plans for special tax treatment, in order...
United States Vs. Banks
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-2004
United States v. Banks - 02-473 (2004) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2003 UNITED STATES V. BANKS SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES v. BANKS certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 02473. Argued October 15, 2003Decided December 2, 2003 When federal and local law enforcement officers went to respondent Bankss apartment to execute a warrant to search for cocaine, they called out police search warrant and rapped on the front door hard enough to be heard by officers at the back door, waited for 15 to 20 seconds with no response, and then broke open the door. Banks was in the shower and testified that he heard nothing until the crash of the door. The District Court denied his motion to suppress the drugs and weapons found during the search, rejecting his argument that the officers waited an unreasonably short time before forcing entry in violation of both the Fourth Amendment and 18 U. S. C. 3109. Banks pleaded guilty, but reserved his ri...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›