Us Supreme Court Court November 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Perry Vs. Louisiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-13-1990
PERRY v. LOUISIANA - 498 U.S. 38 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court PERRY v. LOUISIANA, 498 U.S. 38 (1990) 498 U.S. 38 PERRY v. LOUISIANA CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 89-5120 Argued October 2, 1990 Decided November 13, 1990 Vacated and remanded. Keith B. Nordyke argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were June E. Denlinger and Joe Giarrusso, Jr. Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the breif were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General. * [ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies. PER CURIAM The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court o...
Mississippi Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-05-1990
Mississippi v. United States - 498 U.S. 16 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Mississippi v. United States, 498 U.S. 16 (1990) Mississippi v. United States No. 113, Orig. Decided November 5, 1990 498 U.S. 16 ON BILL OF COMPLAINT Decree entered. The Report of the Special Master is received and ordered filed. The recommended Decree is approved. DECREE On March 1, 1988, this Court granted leave to the State of Mississippi and the United States to file a complaint with the Court setting forth their respective claims to "any undecided portion of Chandeleur Sound." United States v. Louisiana et al. (Alabama and Mississippi Boundary case), 485 U. S. 88 (1988). Thereafter, the State of Mississippi filed the above-captioned litigation which was timely answered by the United States. Pursuant to a stipulation executed by the parties in resolution of the above-styled action, and solely for the purpose of determining the parties' respective rights under the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S. C. 13...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›