Us Supreme Court Court June 1982 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lehman Vs. Lycoming Cty. Ch. Svcs. Agcy.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Lehman v. Lycoming Cty. Ch. Svcs. Agcy. - 458 U.S. 502 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Lehman v. Lycoming Cty. Ch. Svcs. Agcy., 458 U.S. 502 (1982) cg:458 U.S. 502*family law*habeas corpus*jurisdiction*parental rights*parties*standing* ct:Lehman by Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Svcs. Agcy., 458 U. S. 502 (1982) Lehman by Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services Agency No. 80-2177 Argued March 30, 1982 Decided June 30, 1982 458 U.S. 502 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner voluntarily placed her three sons in the legal custody of respondent county agency, which in turn placed them in foster homes. Thereafter, a Pennsylvania state court terminated petitioner's parental rights with respect to her sons because of parental incapacity, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed. Petitioner then filed an action in Federal District Court, seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254(a), which requires a dist...
Velde Vs. National Black Police Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
VELDE v. NATIONAL BLACK POLICE ASSN. - 458 U.S. 591 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court VELDE v. NATIONAL BLACK POLICE ASSN., 458 U.S. 591 (1982) 458 U.S. 591 VELDE, ADMINISTRATOR, LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. NATIONAL BLACK POLICE ASSN., INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 80-1074. Argued December 9, 1981 Decided June 30, 1982 203 U.S. App. D.C. 202, 631 F.2d 784 , vacated and remanded. Deputy Solicitor General Geller argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Acting Solicitor General Wallace, Acting Assistant Attorney General Schiffer, Peter Buscemi, Robert E. Kopp, and Barbara L. Herwig. E. Richard Larson argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Isabelle Katz Pinzler, Bruce J. Ennis, William L. Robinson, and Norman J. Chachkin. PER CURIAM. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals...
Washington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Washington v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1 - 458 U.S. 457 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Washington v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 458 U.S. 457 (1982) Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1 No. 81-9 Argued March 22, 1982 Decided June 30, 1982 458 U.S. 457 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus In 1978, appellee Seattle School District No. 1 (District) enacted the so-called Seattle Plan for desegregation of its schools. The plan makes extensive use of mandatory busing. Subsequently, a statewide initiative (Initiative 350) was drafted to terminate the use of mandatory busing for purposes of racial integration in the public schools of the State of Washington. The initiative prohibits school boards from requiring any student to attend a school other than the one geographically nearest or next nearest to his home. It sets out a number of broad exceptions to this requirement, however: a student may be assigned beyond his neighborhood school if he ...
GriffIn Vs. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. - 458 U.S. 564 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. 564 (1982) Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. No. 81-614 Argued April 26, 1982 Decided June 30, 1982 458 U.S. 564 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Title 46 U.S.C. 596, after obligating the master or owner of a vessel making coasting or foreign voyages to pay a seaman's unpaid wages within specified periods after his discharge, provides that a master or owner who fails to make such payment "without sufficient cause shall pay to the seaman a sum equal to two days' pay for each and every day during which payment is delayed beyond the respective periods." Petitioner, who was injured while working aboard respondent's vessel in foreign waters, brought suit under the Jones Act and general maritime law in Federal District Court after respondent refused to pay his medical expenses and to furnish transportatio...
Crawford Vs. Los Angeles Board of Educ.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Educ. - 458 U.S. 527 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Educ., 458 U.S. 527 (1982) Crawford v. Board of Education of City of Los Angeles No. 81-38 Argued March 22, 1982 Decided June 30, 1982 458 U.S. 527 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT Syllabus In a California state court action seeking desegregation of the schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District (District), the trial court, in 1970, found de jure segregation in violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions and ordered the District to prepare a desegregation plan. The California Supreme Court affirmed, but based its decision solely upon the Equal Protection Clause of the State Constitution, which bars de facto as well as de jure segregation. On remand, the trial court approved a desegregation plan that included substantial mandatory pupil reassignment and busing. While the trial court was considering ...
Loretto Vs. Teleprompter Manhattan Catv Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. - 458 U.S. 419 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982) Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. No. 81-244 Argued March 30, 1982 Decided June 30, 1982 458 U.S. 419 APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Syllabus A New York statute provides that a landlord must permit a cable television (CATV) company to install its CATV facilities upon his property and may not demand payment from the company in excess of the amount determined by a State Commission to be reasonable. Pursuant to the statute, the Commission ruled that a one-time $1 payment was a reasonable fee. After purchasing a five-story apartment building in New York City, appellant landlord discovered that appellee CATV companies had installed cables on the building, both "crossovers" for serving other buildings and "noncrossovers" for serving appellant's tenants. Appellant then brought a class action for damages and ...
General Bldg. Contractors Assn., Inc. Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1982
General Bldg. Contractors Assn., Inc. v. Pennsylvania - 458 U.S. 375 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court General Bldg. Contractors Assn., Inc. v. Pennsylvania, 458 U.S. 375 (1982) General Building Contractors Association, Inc. v. Pennsylvania No. 81-280 Argued March 3, 1982 Decided June 29, 1982 * 458 U.S. 375 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondents -- the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and several black individuals representing a class of racial minorities who are skilled or seek work as operating engineers in the construction industry in Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware -- brought an action in Federal District Court under 42 U.S.C. 1981, seeking to redress alleged racial discrimination in the operation of an exclusive hiring hall established in collective bargaining contracts between the local union representing operating engineers and petitioner trade associations and construction industry employers. Respondents also alleged dis...
Asarco Inc. Vs. Idaho State Tax Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1982
Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm'n - 458 U.S. 307 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm'n, 458 U.S. 307 (1982) Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission No. 80-2015 Argued April 19, 1982 Decided June 29, 1982 458 U.S. 307 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO Syllabus Held: The State of Idaho may not constitutionally include within the taxable income of appellant nondomiciliary parent corporation doing some business (primarily silver mining) in the State a portion of intangible income (dividends, interest payments, and capital gains from the sale of stock) that appellant received from subsidiary corporations having no other connection with the State. Pp. 458 U. S. 315 -330. (a) As a general principle, a State may not tax value earned outside its borders. "[T]he linchpin of apportionability in the field of state income taxation is the unitary business principle." Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vermont, 445 U. S. 425 , 445 U. S....
Williams Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1982
Williams v. United States - 458 U.S. 279 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. United States, 458 U.S. 279 (1982) Williams v. United States No. 80-2116 Argued April 20, 1982 Decided June 29, 1982 458 U.S. 279 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Title 18 U.S.C. 1014 makes it a crime to "knowingly mak[e] any false statement or report," or "willfully overvalu[e] any land, property or security," for the purpose of influencing the action of described financial institutions (including federally insured banks) "upon any application, advance, . . . commitment, or loan." Petitioner engaged in a series of transactions seemingly amounting to a case of "check-kiting" between his accounts in federally insured banks, first drawing a check far in excess of his account balance in one bank and depositing it in his account in the other, and then reversing the process between his accounts. Petitioner was convicted in Federal District Court of viola...
Woolworth Co. Vs. Taxation Dept.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1982
Woolworth Co. v. Taxation Dept. - 458 U.S. 354 (1982) U.S. Supreme Court Woolworth Co. v. Taxation Dept., 458 U.S. 354 (1982) F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New Mexico No. 80-1745 Argued April 19, 1982 Decided June 29, 1982 458 U.S. 354 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO Syllabus Appellant's principal place of business and commercial domicile are in New York, but it engages in chainstore retailing throughout the United States. Under its income tax laws, New Mexico distinguishes between "business" income, which it apportions between it and other States, and "nonbusiness" income, which it generally allocates to a single State on the basis of commercial domicile. Appellant reported its dividend income from four of its foreign subsidiaries, which engage in chainstore retailing in foreign countries, as "nonbusiness" income, none of which was to be allocated to New Mexico. Similarly, appellant did not report as New Mexico "business" income a su...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »