Us Supreme Court Court September 1980 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Board of Ed. of Los Angeles Vs. Superior Court
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Sep-12-1980
Board of Ed. of Los Angeles v. Superior Court - 448 U.S. 1343 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Board of Ed. of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 448 U.S. 1343 (1980) Board of Ed. of Los Angeles v. Superior Court No. A-214 Decided September 12, 1980 448 U.S. 1343 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY Syllabus An application to stay, pending consideration of a petition for certiorari, the California Supreme Court's order which left standing a lower court's order requiring mandatory reassignment and busing of upwards of 80,000 first- through ninth-grade students attending approximately 165 elementary and junior high schools in the Los Angeles school system, is denied. Although this Court would probably have jurisdiction over the present action should a petition for certiorari be filed by the applicant Board, nevertheless it is unlikely that four Justices of this Court would vote to grant certiorari in this case, and a stay granted less than a week before the scheduled opening of school, when school off...
Gregory-portland Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Sep-08-1980
Gregory-Portland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. United States - 448 U.S. 1342 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Gregory-Portland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. United States, 448 U.S. 1342 (1980) Gregory-Portland Independent School District v. United States No. A-203 Decided September 8, 1980 448 U.S. 1342 ON REAPPLICATION FOR STAY Syllabus A reapplication to stay, pending appeal to the Court of Appeals, the District Court's decision ordering the busing of students within the applicant school district is denied. MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST. Applicants have requested me to grant a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit of a decision by the District Court ordering the busing of students within the applicant district. The application, as was proper, was first submitted to MR. JUSTICE POWELL, the Circuit Justice for the Fifth Circuit, and denied by him. It has now been resubmitted to me. As indicated by the cases discussed in the application for stay, e.g., Columbus Board of Educatio...
Moore Vs. Brown
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Sep-05-1980
Moore v. Brown - 448 U.S. 1335 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Moore v. Brown, 448 U.S. 1335 (1980) Moore v. Brown No. A-195 Decided September 5, 1980 448 U.S. 1335 ON APPLICATION FOR STAY Syllabus An application to stay the District Court's preliminary injunction, which ordered Alabama election officials to conduct district, rather than at-large, voting to fill vacancies on the Mobile County School Board, is denied. The District Court may have erred in entering such injunction without hearing further evidence or making fresh findings of fact after its prior decision that the at-large voting system violated the Fourteenth Amendment by diluting the effectiveness of black votes had been vacated and the case had been remanded for further proceedings ( see Williams v. Brown, 446 U. S. 236 ). But in the present posture of the case, the unacceptable alternative to allowing the District Court's preliminary injunction to stand would be to enjoin the coming election entirely and to allow...
Named and Unnamed Children Vs. Texas
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Sep-04-1980
Named and Unnamed Children v. Texas - 448 U.S. 1327 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Named and Unnamed Children v. Texas, 448 U.S. 1327 (1980) Certain Named and Unnamed Non-Citizen Children and their Parents v. Texas No. A-179 Decided September 4, 1980 448 U.S. 1327 ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY Syllabus An application to vacate the Court of Appeals' stay, pending appeal, of the District Court's injunction prohibiting Texas education officials from denying free education to any child, otherwise eligible, due to the child's immigration status -- the District Court having held that a Texas statute which prohibits use of state funds to educate alien children who are not "legally admitted" to the United States violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment -- is granted. This order is without prejudice to a school district's ability to apply for a stay of the District Court's injunction, which stay would be justified if the district can demonstrate that, because of th...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›