Court : US Supreme Court
DELANEY v. FLORIDA - 387 U.S. 426 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court DELANEY v. FLORIDA, 387 U.S. 426 (1967) 387 U.S. 426 DELANEY v. FLORIDA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 1213. Decided May 29, 1967. 190 So.2d 578, appeal dismissed. Alfred I. Hopkins, Irma Robbins Feder and Richard Yale Feder for appellant. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. PATTERSON v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO., 387 U.S. 426 (1967) 387 U.S. 426 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court PATTERSON v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO., 387 U.S. 426 (1967) 387 U.S. 426 PATTERSON ET AL. v. VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. No. 1572, Misc. Decided May 29, 1967. Appeal dismissed and certio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO - 387 U.S. 424 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO, 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 CEPERO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF PUERTO RICO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO. No. 1565, Misc. Decided May 29, 1967. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO., 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO., 387 U.S. 424 (1967) 387 U.S. 424 UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. 450. Decided May 29, 1967. Vacated and remanded. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Lawrence W. Somer...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
STOECKLE v. WOLKE - 387 U.S. 423 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court STOECKLE v. WOLKE, 387 U.S. 423 (1967) 387 U.S. 423 STOECKLE v. WOLKE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. No. 1557, Misc. Decided May 29, 1967. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE v. BUTTON, 387 U.S. 423 (1967) 387 U.S. 423 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE v. BUTTON, 387 U.S. 423 (1967) 387 U.S. 423 SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE v. BUTTON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1106. Decided May 29, 1967. Reversed and remanded. Frank G. Davidson, Jr., and Thomas S. Currier for appellant. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, pro se, and R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The judgme...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
CEPERO v. COLON - 387 U.S. 425 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court CEPERO v. COLON, 387 U.S. 425 (1967) 387 U.S. 425 CEPERO v. COLON ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO. No. 1606, Misc. Decided May 29, 1967. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MARKIS v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 425 (1967) 387 U.S. 425 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court MARKIS v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 425 (1967) 387 U.S. 425 MARKIS v. UNITED STATES. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 43. Decided May 29, 1967. * Certiorari granted; No. 43, 352 F.2d 860 , No. 64, 353 F.2d 672 , vacated and remanded. [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 64, Moretti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. Alfred Belinkie for petitione...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
SCHACKMAN v. ARNEBERGH - 387 U.S. 427 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court SCHACKMAN v. ARNEBERGH, 387 U.S. 427 (1967) 387 U.S. 427 SCHACKMAN ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1186. Decided May 29, 1967. 258 F. Supp. 983, 996, appeal dismissed. Burton Marks for appellants. Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns for appellees Arnebergh et al.; Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes for appellees Younger et al.; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Lynch. PER CURIAM. Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713 , a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Reitman v. Mulkey - 387 U.S. 369 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967) Reitman v. Mulkey No. 483 Argued March 221, 1967 Decided May 29, 1967 387 U.S. 369 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus The California Legislature, during the period 1959-1963, enacted several statutes regulating racial discrimination in housing. In 1964, pursuant to an initiative and referendum, Art. I, 26, was added to the state constitution. It provided in part that neither the State nor any agency thereof "shall deny, limit or abridge, directly or indirectly, the right of any person, who is willing or desires to sell, lease or rent any part or all of his real property, to decline to sell, lease or rent such property to such person or persons as he, in his absolute discretion, chooses." The California Supreme Court held that Art. I, 26, was designed to overturn state laws that bore on the right of private persons to discriminate, that it invalidly involv...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
FTC v. Universal-Rundle Corp. - 387 U.S. 244 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Universal-Rundle Corp., 387 U.S. 244 (1967) Federal Trade Commission v. Universal-Rundle Corp. No. 101 Argued March 13, 1967 Decided May 29, 1967 387 U.S. 244 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus After hearings on a complaint charging respondent with violations of the price discrimination provisions of the Clayton Act, 2(a) as amended, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) found that the 10% truckload discounts offered by respondent on its line of plumbing fixtures had a proscribed anticompetitive effect, since some customers who were unable to purchase in truckload quantities were in competition with customers able to take advantage of the discount. Accordingly, the Commission issued a cease and desist order prohibiting respondent from discriminating in price between competing customers. Thereafter, respondent petitioned the Commission for a stay of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Warden v. Hayden - 387 U.S. 294 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967) Warden v. Hayden No. 480 Argued April 12, 1967 Decided May 29, 1967 387 U.S. 294 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The police were informed that an armed robbery had occurred and that the suspect, respondent, had thereafter entered a certain house. Minutes later, they arrived there and were told by respondent's wife that she had no objection to their searching the house. Certain officers arrested respondent in an upstairs bedroom when it became clear he was the only man in the house. Others simultaneously searched the first floor and cellar. One found weapons in a flush tank; another, looking "for a man or the money," found in a washing machine clothing of the type the suspect was said to have worn. Ammunition was also found. These items were admitted into evidence without objection at respondent's trial, which resulted in his convic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Afroyim v. Rusk - 387 U.S. 253 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967) Afroyim v. Rusk No. 456 Argued February 20, 1967 Decided May 29, 1967 387 U.S. 253 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner, of Polish birth, became a naturalized American citizen in 1926. He went to Israel in 1950, and in 1951 voted in an Israeli legislative election. The State Department subsequently refused to renew his passport, maintaining that petitioner had lost his citizenship by virtue of 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 which provides that a United States citizen shall "lose" his citizenship if he votes in a foreign political election. Petitioner then brought this declaratory judgment action alleging the unconstitutionality of 401(e). On the basis of Perez v. Brownell, 356 U. S. 44 , the District Court and Court of Appeals held that Congress, under its implied power to regulate foreign affairs, can strip an Ameri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. A., T & S.F. R. Co. - 387 U.S. 326 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Chicago & N.W. R. Co. v. A., T & S.F. R. Co., 387 U.S. 326 (1967) Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. No. 8. Argued April 19, 1967 Decided May 29, 1967 * 387 U.S. 326 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Syllabus Eastern and Midwestern railroad carriers filed a complaint with the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) seeking higher divisions of joint tariffs on transcontinental freight traffic. In consolidated proceedings, which involved rate divisions affecting about 300 railroads, the carriers voluntarily aligned themselves into three groups, Eastern, Midwestern and Mountain-Pacific, and submitted evidence and tried the case on this group basis. The ICC found the existing divisions unlawful, and prescribed increased divisions for the Midwestern and Eastern roads. Relying on a Mountain-Pacific cost ...
Tag this Judgment!