Skip to content


Us Supreme Court Court June 1965 Judgments Home Cases Us Supreme Court 1965 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.023 seconds)

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Knowles Vs. Florida

Court : US Supreme Court

KNOWLES v. FLORIDA - 381 U.S. 763 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court KNOWLES v. FLORIDA, 381 U.S. 763 (1965) 381 U.S. 763 KNOWLES v. FLORIDA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 884, Misc. Decided June 7, 1965. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment dismissing the appeal is reversed. Raley v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 437 -440. Cf. Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 . MR. JUSTICE STEWART would deny certiorari. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent. Page 381 U.S. 763, 1 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Federal Power Commission Vs. Pan American Petroleum

Court : US Supreme Court

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM - 381 U.S. 762 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM, 381 U.S. 762 (1965) 381 U.S. 762 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024. Decided June 7, 1965. * [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 1025, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 339 F.2d 694 . Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024. Herbert E. Squires and Joseph C. Bruno for petitioner in No. 1025. J. P. Hammond, William J. Grove and Carroll L. Gilliam for respondent in both cases. PER CURIAM. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgment is revers...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Redmond Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

REDMOND v. VIRGINIA - 381 U.S. 760 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court REDMOND v. VIRGINIA, 381 U.S. 760 (1965) 381 U.S. 760 REDMOND v. VIRGINIA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. No. 1082. Decided June 7, 1965. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. John Alvin Croghan for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 381 U.S. 760, 761 CALIFORNIA v. HURST, 381 U.S. 760 (1965) 381 U.S. 760 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court CALIFORNIA v. HURST, 381 U.S. 760 (1965) 381 U.S. 760 CALIFORNIA v. HURST. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 45. Decided June 7, 1965. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 325 F.2d 891 . Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attor...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Associated Food Retailers, Great. Chicago, Vs. Jewel Tea

Court : US Supreme Court

ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA - 381 U.S. 761 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS, GREAT. CHICAGO, v. JEWEL TEA, 381 U.S. 761 (1965) 381 U.S. 761 ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS OF GREATER CHICAGO, INC., ET AL. v. JEWEL TEA CO., INC. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 321. Decided June 7, 1965. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Reported below: 331 F.2d 547 . Eugene Kart for petitioners. George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Theodore A. Groenke and Samuel Weisbard for respondent. Solicitor General Cox for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG'S opinion...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Angelet Vs. Fay

Court : US Supreme Court

Angelet v. Fay - 381 U.S. 654 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Angelet v. Fay, 381 U.S. 654 (1965) Angelet v. Fay No. 578 Argued March 11, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 654 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a companion case to Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S. 618 , decided this date. Petitioner was convicted in a New York State court in 1951 for possession of narcotics with intent to sell. On December 21, 1950, two detectives attached to the Narcotics Squad of the New York City Police Department entered petitioner's apartment by a door opened by a painter who was just leaving. They ignored the protest of petitioner and proceeded, without a warrant, to search the apartment. Upon entering, one of the officers called an agent of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics . After two federal agents arrived, the local and federal officers made a thorough search of the apartment. One of the l...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Federal Trade Commission Vs. Texaco, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. - 381 U.S. 739 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc., 381 U.S. 739 (1965) Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc. No. 635 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 739 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR TE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus The Court of Appeals set aside a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) cease and desist order on the grounds that the FTC Chairman was disqualified for prejudging the case and the order was not supported by substantial evidence, and remanded it to the FTC with instructions to dismiss in view of the long delays. No review of the Chairman's disqualification was sought. The judgment is remanded with instructions to remand immediately to the FTC or further proceedings, without participation of the Chairman, in light of Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, ante, p. 381 U. S. 357 . Certiorari granted; 118 U.S.App.D.C. 366, 336 F. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Griswold Vs. Connecticut

Court : US Supreme Court

Griswold v. Connecticut - 381 U.S. 479 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Griswold v. Connecticut No. 496 Argued March 29-30, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 479 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT Syllabus Appellants, the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, and its medical director, a licensed physician, were convicted as accessories for giving married persons information and medical advice on how to prevent conception and, following examination, prescribing a contraceptive device or material for the wife's use. A Connecticut statute makes it a crime for any person to use any drug or article to prevent conception. Appellants claimed that the accessory statute, as applied, violated the Fourteenth Amendment. An intermediate appellate court and the State's highest court affirmed the judgment. Held: 1. Appellants have standing to assert the constitutional rights of the married people. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Estes Vs. Texas

Court : US Supreme Court

Estes v. Texas - 381 U.S. 532 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532 (1965) Estes v. Texas No. 256 Argued April 1, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 532 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS Syllabus Petitioner had been indicted by a Texas county grand jury for swindling. Massive pretrial publicity had given the case national notoriety. On the trial date, following a change of venue, a hearing commenced on petitioner's motion to prevent telecasting, radio broadcasting, and news photography. The hearing, conducted in the presence of some trial witnesses and veniremen later released, was carried live on television and radio, and news photography was permitted. The original jury panel, petitioner, counsel, and the trial judge were highly publicized during the two days the pretrial hearing lasted, emphasizing throughout the community the notorious character that the trial would take. Four of the jurors selected later at the trial had seen or heard...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

Linkletter Vs. Walker

Court : US Supreme Court

Linkletter v. Walker - 381 U.S. 618 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618 (1965) Linkletter v. Walker No. 95 Argued March 11, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 618 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner was convicted of burglary by a Louisiana court and his conviction was affirmed by the highest state court. Thereafter, in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643 , this Court held that evidence illegally seized is inadmissible in a state criminal trial, and petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was denied by the federal District Court and by the Court of Appeals, which found the searches of petitioner's person and property illegal but held that the Mapp exclusionary rule was not retrospective. Held: The exclusionary rule announced in Mapp does not apply to state court convictions which had become final before its rendition. Pp. 381 U. S. 622 -640. (a) The effect of a subsequent rul...

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1965 (FN)

United Mine Workers Vs. Pennington

Court : US Supreme Court

United Mine Workers v. Pennington - 381 U.S. 657 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court United Mine Workers v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965) United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington No. 48 Argued January 27, 1965 Decided June 7, 1965 381 U.S. 657 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund sued respondents, partners in a coal mining company, for royalty payments under the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 1950, as amended. Respondents filed a cross-claim for damages, alleging that the trustees, the UMW and certain large coal operators had conspired to restrain and monopolize commerce in violation of 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. It was alleged that, to eradicate overproduction in the coal industry, the UMW and large operators agreed to eliminate the smaller companies by imposing the terms of the 1950 Agreement on all companies regardless of ability to pay, by i...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //