Us Supreme Court Court October 1936 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pick Manufacturing Co. Vs. General Motors Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-26-1936
Pick Manufacturing Co. v. General Motors Corp. - 299 U.S. 3 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court Pick Manufacturing Co. v. General Motors Corp., 299 U.S. 3 (1937) Pick Manufacturing Co. v. General Motors Corp. No. 12 Argued October 13, 14, 1936 Decided October 26, 1936 299 U.S. 3 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus 1. A form of contract by which dealers in automobiles agree with the manufacturers that they will not sell, offer for sale, or use in the repair of the vehicles, second hand or used parts or parts not manufactured or authorized by the manufacturer, is not violative of the Clayton Act if its effect has not been in any way substantially to lessen competition or to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. P. 299 U. S. 4 . 2. Findings concurred in by the District Court and Circuit Court of Appeals are accepted by this Court unless clear error is shown. P. 299 U. S. 4 . 80 F.2d 641 affirmed. PER CURIAM. By this suit petitioner ch...
Woolsey Vs. Best
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-12-1936
Woolsey v. Best - 299 U.S. 1 (1936) U.S. Supreme Court Woolsey v. Best, 299 U.S. 1 (1936) Woolsey v. Best No. 256 Jurisdictional statement distributed September 10, 1936 Decided October 12, 1936 299 U.S. 1 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Syllabus 1. Where there has been a trial for a statutory offense in a state court having jurisdiction, and conviction has been affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State, the party convicted has no federal right to attack the judgment collaterally in the state courts by raising in habeas corpus a federal question concerning the validity of the statute defining the offense which was not raised, but could have been raised, in the earlier proceedings. P. 299 U. S. 2 . 2. An appeal from a state court will be dismissed if it does not appear that the decision complained of was not based upon an adequate nonfederal ground. Id. Appeal dismissed. PER CURIAM. Appellant brought this proceeding in the Supreme Court of Colorado to obtain...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›