Us Supreme Court Court October 1929 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ftc Vs. Klesner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-14-1929
FTC v. Klesner - 280 U.S. 19 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Klesner, 280 U.S. 19 (1929) Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner No. 8 Argued April 10, 1929 Decided October 14, 1929 280 U.S. 19 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 1. Section 5 of the federal Trade Commission Act, unlike the Interstate Commerce Act, does not provide private persons with an administrative remedy for private wrongs. P. 280 U. S. 25 . 2. A complaint may be filed under 5 only "if it shall appear to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public," and this requirement is not satisfied merely by proof that there has been misapprehension and confusion on the part of purchasers, or even that they have been deceived. Page 280 U. S. 20 To justify filing a complaint, the public interest must be specific and substantial. P. 280 U. S. 27 . 3. The Commission has jurisdiction of a complaint authorized by its resolution declar...
Gonzalez Vs. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-14-1929
Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila - 280 U.S. 1 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila, 280 U.S. 1 (1929) Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila No. 6 Argued April 8, 9, 1929 Decided October 14, 1929 280 U.S. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS Syllabus 1. A judgment of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands in a case in which the amount in controversy exceeds $25,000 is reviewable by this Court on certiorari. P. 280 U. S. 11 . 2. The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila is a juristic person amenable to the jurisdiction of the Philippine courts for the enforcement of any legal right, and a right claimed under a will to be appointed to, and receive the income from, a chaplaincy founded by the will is a subject matter within the jurisdiction of those courts. P. 280 U. S. 15 . 3. The facts that the chaplaincy is a collative one and that its property was transferred to the spiritual prope...
Sanitary Refrigerator Co. Vs. Winters
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-14-1929
Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters - 280 U.S. 30 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters, 280 U.S. 30 (1929) Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. Winters Nos. 4 and 14 Argued April 19, 22, 1929 Decided October 14, 1929 280 U.S. 30 CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH AND THIRD CIRCUITS, RESPECTIVELY Syllabus 1. On writs of certiorari to review contrary decisions of two circuit courts of appeals on whether a patent was infringed by a particular device, the plaintiff being the same in both cases and the Page 280 U. S. 31 defendant in one assuming defense of the other, this Court has no occasion to determine the validity of the patent claims involved where, in the courts below, the defense conceded their validity if limited to the specific structure disclosed, and where their validity was upheld in one case, not denied in the other, and not questioned by the defense in its petition for certiorari. P. 280 U. S. 34 . 2. A decree of a ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›