Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3478 OF2022Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Nemichand Damodardas & Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur Bench in First Appeal No.1302 of 2009 by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the original owners/original claimants and has enhanced the amount of compensation for the lands acquired mainly relying upon the prevailing Ready Reckoner rates of the land, the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) has preferred the present appeal.2. That the lands owned by the respondents herein original landowners situated at Yavatmal, Maharashtra were acquired by the 1 State Government under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act for BSNL. The Land Acquisition Officer declared the award determining the total compensation @ Rs.1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4669 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No.6898/2021) The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana & Anr. .Appellant(s) Versus B. Rangaswamy (Dead) By Lrs. & Ors. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.4670 OF2022@ SLP(C) NO.7610/2021) JUDGMENT A.S. Bopanna,J.Leave granted.2. The Appellants-State of Telangana through its Principal Secretary as appellant No.1 and District Collector as appellant No.2 are before this Court in the Appeal bearing No.4669/2022 (arising out of SLP68982021), assailing the judgment dated 01.04.2021 passed by High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in CCCA No.22/1999. The appellant in Appeal No.Page 1 of 44 4670/2022 (arising out of SLP No.7610/2021), is also assailing the same judgment insofar as cancellation of a portion (298 sq.yards) of the suit subject land allotted in his favour. The consequence of the result of the main appeal will befall on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.644 of 2022 Hajabhai Rajashibhai Odedara ...Appellant Versus State of Gujarat ...Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 25.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal No.11 of 2015 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein original accused and has confirmed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court convicting the appellant herein original 1 accused for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, & 328 of the IPC, the original accused has preferred the present appeal.2. The appellant herein original accused was tried by the learned Trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 328, 120B & 201 of the IPC and under the provisions of the Arms Act. 2.1 As per the case of the prosecution the coac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2397 of 2022 Delhi Development Authority ...Appellant Versus Diwan Chand Anand & Ors. Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL NO.2398 OF2022Delhi Development Authority Appellant Versus Diwan Chand Anand & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.11. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 09.07.2007 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No.280 of 2001 and the subsequent order dated 13.01.2012 passed by the High Court in R.P. No.314 of 2008 in the very same RFA No.280 of 2001, the original appellant before the High Court Delhi Development Authority (DDA for short) has preferred the present appeals.2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under: The two plaintiffs, namely, Shri Diwan Chand Anand and Smt. Chanan Kanta Anand claiming to be the coowners of the suit property filed the suit before the Civil Court/learned Trial Court for declaration and permanent inju...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4649 OF2022[ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.12833 OF2014 SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT INDIA LTD. APPELLANT VERSUS OMESH MISHRA MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 16.04.2014 passed by High Court of Delhi in C.M. (M) No.493 of 2012, preferred by appellant company herein under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the order dated 13.01.2012 passed in Execution Petition No.46 of 2006, vide which, the Executing Court entertained the objections filed by appellant company and 1 proceeded to frame issues with a direction to the parties to lead evidence on those issues.3. The Execution Petition was filed by respondent trust, alongwith legal heirs of late Shri N.D. Mishra for execution of judgment and decree dated 01.02.2003 passed by Trial Court in Civil Suit No.278 of 2002. The suit was filed by...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4645 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.13800 OF2021 Karan Kapoor Appellant Versus Madhuri Kumar ...Respondent JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the Judgment dated 08.04.2021, passed by the High Court of Delhi in Regular First Appeal No.218 of 2021 (hereinafter referred as RFA No.218 of 2021) preferred by the Appellant, whereby the said RFA was dismissed and the High Court thereby upheld the Order dated 01.12.2020 passed in Civil Suit No.867 of 2018 and Review Order dated 17.02.2021 in Civil Suit No.867 of 1 2018 passed by ADJO7, Saket Court, (South East), New Delhi.3. The brief facts of the matter are that Appellant was a tenant in the Residential Property owned by Respondent bearing No.B228, Ground Floor, Greater Kailash1, New Delhi110048, including the builtup area in the stilt portion of the building (hereinafter referred as the Suit Property), which comprise...
Tag this Judgment!