Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CIVIL) NO.7241 OF2021 M. V. CHANDRAKANTH Appellant Versus SANGAPPA & ORS. .Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against a judgment and final order dated 31st March 2021 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka (Dharwad Bench), allowing Writ Appeal No.100388 of 2017(GM-CC) filed by the Respondent No.1 and setting aside an order dated 13th June 2017 passed by the Single Judge dismissing Writ Petition No.1449 of 2006 (GM-CC) filed by the Respondent No.1 claiming the benefit of reservation for Other Backward Classes as a member of the Ganiga caste.3. By a Government Order being G.O. No.SWD150BCA94dated 17th September 1994, the Government of Karnataka formulated a Reservation Policy, for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and 2 Other Backward Classes for admission to professional courses for the year 1994-95, which is herei...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4964 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.9233 OF2020 NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ....Appellant (s) versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE22), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI & ANR. .Respondent (s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against the judgment and final order dated 20th December 2019 passed by High Court of Delhi dismissing the Writ Petition being Writ Petition (C) No.8527 of 2019 filed by the Appellant against the refusal of the Respondent No.1 to modify the Certificate dated 26th June 2019 issued to the Appellant for the Financial/Previous Year 2019-20, corresponding to the Assessment Year 2020-21, under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act 1961, hereinafter referred to as the 2 IT Act, for Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) at the rate of 4% in respect of payments received by the Appellant from Oil and Natural Gas Company Ltd. hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4978 of 2022 ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.16767/2018 M/S BHAGWANDAS B. RAMCHANDANI ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS BRITISH AIRWAYS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. Leave granted. 2.1 Carriage by Air Act, 1972, incorporates international air traffic conventions of Warsaw, 1929, Hague Protocol, 1955, and Montral Convention, 1999 in the First, Second, and the Third Schedules of the Act. Rule 30 of the Second Schedule, which incorporates the Hague Protocol, provides that the right to damages will be extinguished if an action is not brought within a period of two years from the dates mentioned in the Rule. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 30 provides that the method of calculating the period of limitation shall be determined by the law of the Court seized of the matter. As Limitation Act, 1963 is the law applicable to the Courts in India, it is contended on behalf of the consumers of the Airlines Page 1 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4987 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C)No.17166/2021) ROHITH THAMMANA GOWDA APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Petition (Habeas Corpus) No.76 of 2020. The appellant herein filed the said Writ Petition seeking the following main relief: Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to secure the minor Aarya Ranjini Rohith, the only child of the Petitioner, aged about 9 years, and produce the minor Aarya Ranjini Rohith before this Honble Court and hand over the custody of the said minor child to the 2 Petitioner who is the father of the minor, so that the child can be taken to the United States of America where he was born and is a citizen of and wher...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No... OF2022(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1132-1155 of 2022) DAXABEN .Appellant Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. .Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. These Appeals are against the impugned final judgment and order dated 20th October 2020 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad allowing the Criminal Revisional Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (Cr.P.C), being R/Criminal Misc. Application Nos. 5026 of 2020, 5600 of 2020, 5107 of 2020, 5004 of 2020, 5108 of 2020, 5165 of 2020, 5159 of 2020, 5161 of 2020, 5524 of 2020, 5166 of 2020, 5162 of 2020, 5739 of 2020 and quashing the FIR being C.R. No.I-11209016200112 dated 1st March 1 2020 registered with Himmatnagar A Division Police Station, District Sabarkantha, and also the order dated 29th July 2021 passed by the High Court dismissing the Criminal Miscellaneous Applications filed by the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3611 OF2015M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOLPUR ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appeal challenges the order dated 12th November 2013 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta, thereby dismissing the appeal being CEXA No.23 of 2013 filed by the present appellant, which was in turn filed, challenging the order dated 26th April 2013 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the CESTAT), dismissing the application filed by the present appellant seeking rectification of the order dated 30th October 2012 passed by the CESTAT. The application was filed on the ground that while passing the order dated 30th October 1 2012, the CESTAT did not notice the fact that the application filed by the present appellant was pending before the Comm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1050 OF2022[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.2403 of 2017]. SHIV KUMAR SHARMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 06.01.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant/accused, which was in turn filed thereby challenging the judgment and order dated 24.10.2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act No.1, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the Special Judge), convicting the appellant for the offences punishable under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act for short) and under Section 477A of Indian Penal 2 Code, 1860 (IPC for short) and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for on...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOSOF2022(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.16631-16632/2018) HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.13883/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.16585/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.16569/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.16612/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.16628/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No./2022 @ SLP(C)D.No.32828/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.26059/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.28961/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.28941/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.28959/2018 2 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.28949/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.2886/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.7504/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No./2022 @ SLP(C)D.No.8299/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.9194/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.14181/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.15674/2019 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.13884/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ SLP(C)No.16583/2018 C.A.NO./2022 @ S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.143/2020 SANJAY PURAN BAGDE & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. On the fateful night intervening 2nd and 3rd November, 2015 at about 3 a.m. the deceased Vilas Babusa Gawande and his wife Sau. Anita Vilas Gawande woke up and while the wife was doing preparations for cooking, the husband went to attend to the natures call. The wife (PW-6) heard shouts of the husband that four persons were assaulting him and when she ran to the spot she saw two of them, Manoj Puran Badge and Puran Sakharam Bagde assaulting the husband with an axe and whereas the appellants before us Sanjay Puran Bagde and Rajratna @ Nandu Bagde had caught hold of him. On her creating a noise loudly, all of them ran away. She found her husband bleeding who also told her that four of them had caught hold of him and assaulted him by means of an axe. She gave some water ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2119 OF2010STATE OF RAJASTHAN APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KISTOORA RAM RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The present appeal challenges the judgment dated 15th September 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in D.B. Criminal Appeal No.25 of 1986, thereby acquitting the respondentaccused herein and reversing the judgment dated 10th January 1986 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Original Criminal Case No.114 of 1984, thereby convicting the respondentaccused herein under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment. The respondentaccused was also convicted under Section 201 of the IPC and sentenced to 1 undergo three years rigorous imprisonment.2. The respondentaccused was charged for an offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of...
Tag this Judgment!