Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION(CRL)No.OF2022(Arising out of D.No.29606 of 2021) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1182 OF2019BILTU BHATTACHARYA Petitioner Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent ORDER Delay in preferring Review Petition is condoned. The conviction and sentence recorded against the petitioner for having committed offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 120-B of the IPC and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 by both the courts below, was affirmed after considering the entire material on record. 2 We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. .J.[Uday Umesh Lalit]. .J.[S. Ravindra Bhat]. .J.[Bela M. Trivedi]. New Delhi; 10th May, 2022....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11212 OF2017RAM CHANDRA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 25th March, 2014, passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the Writ Petition No.17066 of 2014, whereby the said writ petition was dismissed.2. The facts in brief giving rise to the present appeal are as under:1. 3. The RespondentBundelkhand University (hereinafter referred to as the University) had published an advertisement for making appointments to various posts of teaching faculty in the year 2002.4. The appellant had applied in response to the said advertisement and was interviewed by a Selection Committee, which was constituted in accordance with subsection (4) of Section 31 of the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 1973 Act).5. Though, th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.749 OF2022Rekha Jain ..Appellant (S) Versus The State of Karnataka & Anr. ..Respondent (S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 15.09.2020 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No.3442/2020, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said criminal petition and has refused to quash the FIR/criminal proceedings against petitioners, the original writ petitioners before the High Court have preferred the present appeal. 12. At the outset, it is required to be noted that by order dated 08.01.2021, the present appeal in respect of petitioner No.1 (Kamalesh Mulchand Jain) has been dismissed and the notice has been issued in respect of appellant petitioner No.2 (Rekha Jain). Therefore, the present appeal is required to be considered qua accused Rekha Jain only.3. That respondent No.2 herein original com...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
CA16921693/2020 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos 1692-1693 of 2020 M/s Aravali Power Co Pvt Ltd Appellant Versus Vedprakash and Another Respondents W I T H Civil Appeal No 3236 of 2020 Civil Appeal Nos 3171-3172 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3231 of 2020 Civil Appeal Nos 3229-3230 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2947 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3235 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3237 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3398 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2838 of 2020 CA16921693/2020 2 Civil Appeal No 3040 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2713 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2760 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2803 of 2020 Civil Appeal Nos 3232-3233 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 2946 of 2020 Civil Appeal Nos 3038-3039 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3234 of 2020 Civil Appeal Diary No 17940 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3173 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 3575 of 2020 Civil Appeal Diary No 22073 of 2020 Civil Appeal Nos 3971-3972 of 2020 Civil Appeal No 225 of 2021 & Civil Appeal Diary No 8142 of 2021 CA16921693/2020 3 JUDGM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5233 0F2012NEDUMPILLI FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.5230 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5190 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5191 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5184 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5241 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5185 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5111 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5188 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5187 OF20121 CIVIL APPEAL No.5183 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5113 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO.3857 OF2022(@Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8331 of 2015) TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) No.359 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL No.5186 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5192 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5189 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5112 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5232 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5231 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5234 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5237 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5238 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.5315 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1878618787 OF2017CIVIL APPEAL No.1324 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL No.7836 OF201...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.278 OF2022SURESH MAHAJAN PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.1. This writ petition assails the validity of Section 10(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Act, 1956, Sections 12, 23 and 30 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 and Section 29 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 as being arbitrary and usurping the powers and independence of the State Election Commission.2. By stated amendments, the State Government has been authorized to issue notification from time to time determining the number and extent of wards to be constituted in the concerned local bodies. More or less, similar situation obtains in the 2 dispensation provided for in the State of Maharashtra, after the amendment of relevant enactments as noted in our order dated 04.05.2022 passed in SLP(C) No.19756 of 2021 and connected cases.3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. of 2022) (Arising out of Diary No.13901 of 2017) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Appellant versus SMT. SHASHI KIRAN & ORS. ETC. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos._________of 2022) (Arising out of Diary No.36222 of 2018) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Appellant versus C.L. KHANNA (RETD.) & ORS. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.________ of 2022) (Arising out of Diary No.36221 of 2018) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Appellant versus DR. S.N. SINGH Respondent 2 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.29577 of 2018) UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Appellant versus DR. SANTOSH KAUR SANGARI & ORS. Respondents AND WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.________ of 2022) (Arising out of Diary No.17007 of 2017) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3484 OF2022Reshma Sultana Appellant Versus The State of Karnataka & Ors. Respondents J UD G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, Bench at Dharwad, in W.A. No.100066 of 2020 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein original respondent No.10, the appellant herein original respondent No.10 - Reshma Sultana has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:- 1 2.1 That respondent No.10 herein Ilyas Ahmed Patwegar original writ petitioner applied for the post of Urdu Teacher in Nehru Arts, Science and Commerce Degree College, Hubli, run by Anjuman-E-Islam Education Board. He was appointed on 1.7.2002. Later, an advertisement was published in the loca...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2982 OF2022Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh Appellant(s) Versus State of Goa & Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 01.08.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay at Goa in Writ Petition No.710 of 2016 by which the High Court has dismissed the writ petition preferred by the appellant herein in which the appellant herein challenged the validity of the Errata Notification dated 14.07.2016 issued by the State of Goa modifying/correcting its earlier notification dated 23/24.05.2016 by which the State of Goa fixed the rates of minimum wages in various sectors, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.2. The State of Goa issued a notification dated 23/24.05.2016 in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 3 read with clause (i) of sub-section (1) of Section 4 and sub- 1 section (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.2929 of 2022 Veena Singh (Dead) Through LR ...Appellant Versus The District Registrar/Additional Collector (F/R) ...Respondents And Another 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 B Submissions of Counsel ................................................................................ 13 C Analysis ......................................................................................................... 18 C.1 Statutory Framework of the Registration Act .......................................... 18 C.2 Validity of the recourse by the Second Respondent ............................... 27 C.3 Meaning of execution ............................................................................ 33 D Conclusion ......
Tag this Judgment!