Skip to content


Biltu Bhattacharya Vs. The State Of West Bengal - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Source Linkhttps://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2021/29606/29606_2021_2_1001_35669_Judgement_10-May-2022.pdf
Case NumberR.P.(Crl.) No.-000132-000132 - 2022
Judge
AppellantBiltu Bhattacharya
RespondentThe State Of West Bengal
Advocates:SHEKHAR KUMAR __
Excerpt:
.....having committed offences punishable under sections 302 read with 120-b of the ipc and section 27(3) of the arms act, 1959 by both the courts below, was affirmed after considering the entire material on record. 2 we have gone through the grounds raised in the review petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. this review petition is, therefore, dismissed. ……………………………….j.[uday umesh lalit]. ……………………………….j.[s. ravindra bhat]. ……………………………….j.[bela m. trivedi]. new delhi; 10th may, 2022.
Judgment:

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION(CRL)No.OF2022(Arising out of D.No.29606 of 2021) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1182 OF2019BILTU BHATTACHARYA …Petitioner Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL …Respondent ORDER

Delay in preferring Review Petition is condoned. The conviction and sentence recorded against the petitioner for having committed offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 120-B of the IPC and Section 27(3) of the Arms Act, 1959 by both the courts below, was affirmed after considering the entire material on record. 2 We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ……………………………….J.

[Uday Umesh Lalit]. ……………………………….J.

[S. Ravindra Bhat]. ……………………………….J.

[Bela M. Trivedi]. New Delhi; 10th May, 2022.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //