Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1069 OF2022JAINA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY .... APPELLANT VERSUS THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. .... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 9th September, 2016 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the NCDRC) in Revision Petition No.1104 of 2016 whereby the NCDRC while allowing the said Revision Petition filed by Respondent No.1-Insurance Company, has set aside the order dated 16th December, 2015 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal, Commission, Haryana at Panchkula and 1 the order dated 26th February, 2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon.2. Heard Mr. Avinash Lakhanpal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. None has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents though duly served.3. The precise questi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C)No.OF2022(Arising out of Diary No.25600 of 2021) IN CIVIL APPEAL No.5746 OF2021O.S. KANNAN Petitioner Versus A. ALIMA AND ANR Respondents ORDER The delay in preferring Review Petition is condoned. The compensation in the sum of Rs. 22,35,870/- granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madurai was affirmed by the High Court, which decision was under challenge before this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances on record, the quantum of compensation was raised to the level of Rs.40 lakhs by this Court. The instant Review Petition claims further enhancement. We have gone through the contents of the Review Petition and do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. J.[Uday Umesh Lalit]. J.[S. Ravindra Bhat]. J.[Bela M. Trivedi]. New Delhi; February 10, 2022....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
WP(Crl) 439/2021 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Criminal) No 439 of 2021 Sharafat Ali Petitioner Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the enforcement of the right under Article 21 of the Constitution, following an order dated 30 July 2021 rejecting the application of the petitioner for premature release. WP(Crl) 439/2021 2 2 The petitioner has been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code 18601 on 17 January 2005 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The judgment of the trial Judge was affirmed in appeal by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on 3 June 2016. The Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution was dismissed by this Court on 20 April 2018. 3 The petitioner had undergone 17 years, 9 months and 26 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1269 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.20913 OF2018 R. VALLI & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The legal heirs of deceased V. Rajasekaran are in appeal herein being aggrieved against an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 7.11.2017 granting a compensation of Rs.15,12,628/- along with an interest @ 7.5% from the date of petition till the date of realization on account of the death of the deceased in a motor vehicle accident on 22.02.2011. 12. The deceased was riding a two-wheeler when a bus belonging to the respondent dashed into his vehicle. The deceased suffered head injuries and died instantly. He was born on 11.4.1956 and was 54 years old on the date of accident. On the basis of income and age, the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Chennai1 awarded a compensation of Rs.13,82,628/-.3. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1116 OF2022M.P. Housing Board & Anr. Appellant(s) Versus Satish Kumar Batra and Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 18.09.2020 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore in Writ Appeal No.392 of 2009 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein and has set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 09.09.2009 passed in Writ Petition No.2624 of 2008 and has held that the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein shall be entitled for the same relief, which has been extended to the similarly placed persons Gajanand Mali, who was the petitioner in the Writ Petition No.651 of 1995, the M.P. Housing Board and Anr. have preferred the present appeal. 12. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as unde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 200 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s).8283 OF2021 SHAFIYA KHAN @ SHAKUNTALA PRAJAPATI .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 8th September, 2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad declining to interfere in the criminal proceedings initiated against the appellant at the instance of respondent no.2/complainant (botherinlaw of the appellant). 13. The case of the appellant is that she was born in a Hindu family and was married in May 2009 when she was a minor (17 years) to one Shiv Gobind Prajapati with whom she never stayed and the marriage was never consummated. In the divorce petition which was filed by Shiv Gobind Prajapati, it was admitted that the marriage was never consummated and this marriage was dissolved through Village Panchayat in 2014 between the familie...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1137 OF2018MS. X ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court in the instant writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to quash and set aside the order dated 11.01.2018 of Chief Justice of the High Court communicated on 25.1.18 of Madhya Pradesh passed after the Full Court Meeting, rejecting the application 1 for reinstatement as violative of Articles 14, 15, 16, 21 r/w. 233, 235 & 311 of the Constitution of India and Natural Justice; b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring that the Petitioner's resignation from the post of Additional District Judge VIII, Gwalior dated 15.07.2014 amounts to constructi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.363 OF2022Bank of Baroda ..Appellant (S) VERSUS M/s Karwa Trading Company & Anr. ..Respondent (S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.09.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.349 of 2017, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said intracourt appeal and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order dated 12.01.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge and has 1 directed that if the respondent borrower deposits a further sum of Rs.17 lakhs to the bank, the bank shall release the property and handover possession along with the title deeds of the residential/housing property in question to the borrower and by which the Division Bench of the High Court has further directed that the SA No.9/2014 filed by the borrower before ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.198 OF2022[@ SLP(Crl.)No.9796 of 2021]. SK. SUPIYAN @ SUFFIYAN @ SUPISAN APPELLANT v. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.Leave granted.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned Order of the High Court at Calcutta by which he was denied pre-arrest bail. The appellant sought pre-arrest bail in connection with First Information Report (FIR) registered at the Nandigram police station. One Debabrata Maity sustained injuries on 3rd May 2021 in an alleged incident of mob attack. He succumbed to injuries on 13th May 2021. The FIR was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 2 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 326, and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on 13th May 2021. The appellant was not named in the FIR.2. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the investigation of the case on 30th August 2021. Though in September 2021, the appellant ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1097-1098 OF2018PAPPU . APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH . RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Dinesh Maheshwari, J.Table of Contents Preliminary.......................................................................................................2 Relevant factual and background aspects....................................................6 Prosecution Evidence.....................................................................................9 Defence Version and Evidence....................................................................19 Trial Court found the appellant guilty and awarded death sentence.......20 High Court confirmed the death sentence awarded to the appellant.......24 Rival Submissions.........................................................................................28 The scope and width of these appeals........................................................46 1 C...
Tag this Judgment!