Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.835 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.29384 OF2018 STATE OF KERALA & ANOTHER .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANIE LUKOSE . . RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 30.7.2018 passed in Writ Appeal No.1513 of 2018 confirming the judgment dated 19.2.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the Writ Petition (C) No.2573 of 2016.3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the respondent had retired as selection grade Lecturer on availing voluntary retirement w.e.f. 31.7.2006. His basic pension was fixed in the prerevised scale at Rs. 8907/ p.m.. Inadvertently, 1 in the verification report, the basic pension was erroneously shown as Rs. 7138/ p.m. (prerevised). Thereafter, on revision in the scale of pay, it was enhanced to Rs. 11,127/ and made effective from 1.1.2006. The fixation of the said basic pension was chall...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 823-827 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.2001-2005 of 2021) The State of Manipur & Ors. .... Appellant (s) Versus Surjakumar Okram & Ors. . Respondent (s) W I T H Civil Appeal Nos. 828-832 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.2386-2390 of 2021) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. The Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appointment, Salary and Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2012 (Manipur Act No.10 of 2012) (hereinafter referred to as the 2012 Act) was enacted by the Legislature of Manipur to provide for appointment, salary and allowances 1 | Pa ge of Parliamentary Secretaries in Manipur. Section 3 read with Section 4 thereof, enabled the Chief Minister to appoint a member of the Manipur Legislative Assembly as a Parliamentary Secretary, who shall have the rank and status of a Minister of State. Section 7 of the 2012 Act stipulated that a Parliamentary Secretary shall be entitl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.388 OF2021VASUDEV APPELLANT Versus STATE of M.P. ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari, J.Arising out of the judgment dated 14.02.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2009 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, judicature at Jabalpur, confirming the judgment dated 7.3.2009 in S.T. No.185 of 2006 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chhatarpur, the present Special Leave Petition has been filed, in which leave was granted directing to call for the record. However, this appeal has been registered and heard on priority basis as the appellant being the senior citizen. 12. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 15.6.2006, Sub Inspector R.S. Bagri (PW6) along with SubDivisional Officer Dr. Sanjay Agrawal (PW10) reached village Mahoi Kala on having information at Police Station Sarwai that absconding accused Rajesh Shukla was hiding with his associate members in th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 158 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 1691 of 2020) Subhash Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Respondent W I T H Criminal Appeal No 159 of 2022 [Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 876 of 2022 @ SLP (Crl) Diary No 28864 of 2020]. 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J A Facts .............................................................................................................. 2 B Submissions ................................................................................................. 5 C Analysis ........................................................................................................ 9 1 Leave granted. A Facts 2 These appeals arise from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 11 January 2019 in Criminal Appeal No 5307 of 2008. 3 The appeal before the High Court arose from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Badaun dated 30 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1543-1544 OF2019JOGI RAM Appellant Versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.Background:1. The consequences of a testamentary disposition by a Will dated 15.4.1968 by one Tulsi Ram, who passed away on 17.11.1969 is still pending resolution before us after half a century.2. The Will aforesaid bequeathed the testators estate to his son, the appellant herein, and his second wife Ram Devi (the first wife being deceased whose progeny is the appellant). Land measuring 175 kanals and 9 marla, a residential house and a Bara is Village Jundla, Haryana was bequeathed half and half to the appellant and Ram Devi. However, the nature of bequeath was different for the two. The appellant was 1 given absolute ownership rights to the extent of his share of land and property whereas Ram Devi was given a limited ownership for her enjoyment during her lifetime with respect to her share of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 837-838 OF2022[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.35970-71 of 2016]. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Appellant (s) Through its Senior Manager Versus M/s Shree Ganesh Petroleum Rajgurunagar Through its Proprietor Mr. Laxman Dagdu Thite Respondent (s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are filed by Indian Oil Corporation Limited against a judgment and order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay partly allowing Arbitration Appeal No.19 of 2013 filed by the Respondent and dismissing Arbitration Appeal No.39 of 2013 filed by the Appellant.3. The facts giving rise to these appeals are stated very briefly hereinafter. 14. The Appellant took a plot of land, hereinafter referred to as the said premises, on lease from the Respondent for a term of 29 years, pursuant to a deed of lease dated 20th September 2005 which was duly registered, in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.85 of 2022 The State of Sikkim Appellant Versus Jasbir Singh & Anr. Respondent 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J A Facts........................................................................................................................2 B Submissions............................................................................................................8 C Analysis.................................................................................................................14 D Conclusion.............................................................................................................42 A Facts 2 1 This appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court of Sikkim. While exercising the revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 19731, the High Court has upheld the order of the Sessions Ju...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.34 OF2022State of U.P. ..Appellant(S) Versus Veerpal & Anr. ..Respondent(S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.05.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.4658 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondents herein original accused and has acquitted the accused for the offences under Section 302 read with 1 Section 34 of the IPC, the State has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under: 2.1 That PW1 Bengali Babu gave the First Information Report which was registered as Crime No.1144/11 initially for the offences under Section 326 of the IPC to the effect that on 20.12.2011 at about 2:30 pm, he got a call from Radha daughter of the deceased that her mother had got burnt. ...
Tag this Judgment!