Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2348 OF2004M/s. OCL INDIA LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF ORISSA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.15179 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4649-4650 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.289 OF2012JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. Since common questions of law relating to the interpretation of local area occurring under Entry 52 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution are involved, this Court by its order dated 26.03.2015 referred the issue for the decision of a larger bench. The reference order took note of a previous Constitution Bench ruling in Diamond Sugar Mills Ltd. & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.1 where the court held that a local area would be an area which is administered by a local body such as a municipality, a district Board, a local board, a Panchayat or the like and that factory premises 1 (1961) 3 SCR2422 are not covered by the aforesaid expression. The court al...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8037 OF2022Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences Appellant Versus Dr. Yerra Trinadh & Others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8038 OF2022JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 31.10.2019 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amravati in Writ Appeal Nos. 363 & 364 of 2019, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said writ appeals and has confirmed the common judgment and order dated 1 19.09.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition Nos. 10376/2019 and 9486/2019 ordering/directing the re-evaluation of the answer scripts of the respective original writ petitioners who appeared in post-graduation in diploma course in the NTR University of Health Sciences (appellant herein), the University has preferred the present appeals.2. That the original writ petitioners appeared in post-graduation di...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. of 2022 (Arising out of the Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 86588659 of 2019) THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ANR. ETC. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR B. & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH Civil Appeal Nos.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 1672116722 of 2019) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3289 of 2021) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3287 of 2021) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.1701 of 2021) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8547 of 2021) Civil Appeal Nos.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) Nos.1506315064 of 2022 @ Diary No.46219 of 2019) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.1366 of 2021) Civil Appeal No.. of 2022 (Arising out of Special ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6954 OF2022State Bank of India Appellant Versus Arvindra Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Respondent JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 10.03.2022 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.12953 of 2018 by which in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the High Court has granted further six 1 weeks time to the original writ petitioner to make the payment of balance amount (Rs.2.02 crores with interest) as per the sanctioned letter of OTS dated 21.09.2017, the State Bank of India has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:2. 1 That the State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) sanctioned a cash credit in favour of the respondent Arvindra Electronics Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Borrower). In 2012, the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7962 OF2022Delhi Development Authority Appellant(s) Versus Damini Wadhwa & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No.11735 of 2016 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the private respondents herein original writ petitioners and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the lands in question has lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013), the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has preferred the present appeal. 12. That the respondent No.1 herein original writ petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court seeking declaration that the acquisition with respect to the s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 946-947 OF2019ASHOK KUMAR SINGH CHANDEL ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1030-1031/2019 ASHUTOSH SINGH @ DABBU Vs. THE STATE OF U.P., ETC. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1046-1047/2019 RAGHUVIR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P. ETC WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1269-1270/2019 PRADEEP SINGH & ANR. Vs. STATE OF U.P., ETC. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1804-1805/2019 BHAN SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ETC. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1980-1981/2019 SAHAB SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1279-1280/2019 NASEEM Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Page 1 of 102 WITH SLP (CRL) No.10742/2019 RAJEEV SHUKLA Vs. ASHOK SINGH CHANDEL & ORS. WITH W.P.(CRL.) No.57/2022 RAJEEV KUMAR SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS. JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. These Criminal Appeals are by seven accused convicted and sentenced to life by the High Court of Judi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 80148015 OF2022Rajaram Abasaheb Deshmukh Appellant(s) Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.2876/2022 and Writ Petition (WP) No.9109/2021, by which, the High Court has allowed WP No.9109/2021 preferred by respondent Nos. 1 to 4 herein (in Civil Appeal arising out of WP No.9109/2021) and has quashed and set aside orders dated 02.01.2020 and 17.02.2020 passed by 1 the Deputy Collector, Pune Division and consequently dismissed WP No.2876/2022, the original writ petitioner in WP No.2876/2022 contesting respondent No.1 in WP No.9109/2021 has preferred the present appeals.2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under: 2.1 That both, the appellant as well as contesting responde...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
(Revised) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL / CRIMINAL / ORIGINAL / APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 26194/2020 SARADA VIDHYALAYA MATRICULATION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH Diary No.26194-2020, Diary No.26198-2020, Diary No.26201-2020, Diary No.26284-2020,Diary No.26298-2020, Diary No.26302-2020, Diary No.26332-2020, Diary No.26340-2020, Diary No.26499-2020, Diary No.26514-2020, Diary No.26541-2020, Diary No.26545-2020, Diary No.26552-2020, Diary No.26574-2020, Diary No.26644-2020, Diary No.26763-2020, Diary No.26778-2020, Diary No.26889-2020, Diary No.26899-2020, Diary No.26930-2020, Diary No.26977-2020, Diary No.26986-2020, Diary No.26991-2020, Diary No.26999-2020, Diary No.27034-2020, Diary No.27115-2020, Diary No.27125-2020, Diary No.27126-2020, Diary No.27350-2020, Diary No.27466-2020, Diary No.27476-2020, Diary No.27480-20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.1849 OF2022IN CIVIL APPEAL No.21762 OF2017ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. By this application, the revenue seeks a clarification of the judgment dated 19.10.2022, delivered by this court, in CA217622017 and connected appeals. The clarification sought is that para 254 of the judgment should be such as to enable the Revenue to redo the assessments in accordance with the above judgments for the past and examine the eligibility on a yearly basis for the future and thus render justice.2. This court, by the judgment in question, had considered and pronounced upon the interpretation of Section 2 (15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in relation to charitable trusts which engage in activities that further objects of general public utility. The activities and cases of various ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION SUOMOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.3 OF2021IN RE: PERRY KANSAGRA .....CONTEMNOR JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. This decision on Sentencing will be in continuation of our judgment dated 11.07.2022 by which Perry Kansagra (hereinafter referred to as the contemnor) was convicted for acts of civil as well as criminal contempt of this Court. For passing the consequential order of Sentence, we adjourned the case several times1 and after being satisfied that sufficient opportunity was given to the contemnor, we proceeded to hear the learned Senior Counsel Ms. Sonia Mathur for Smriti Kansagra (wife of the contemnor and mother of their son Aditya) and the Additional Solicitor General and reserved the case for 1 After the judgment dated 11.07.2002 the case was listed on 22.07.2022, 27.09.2022, 30.09.2022, 17.10.2022 and 21.10.2022. Page 1 of 32 orders. By this judgment, we will consider and pass appropriate orders of Se...
Tag this Judgment!