Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8258 OF2022The Commissioner of Income Tax - 23 Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8259 OF2022The Commissioner of Income Tax - 23 Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.06.2013 passed by the High Court of Bombay passed in Income Tax Appeal No.1074 of 2009 (relating to A.Y. 1993- 1 1994) and the judgment and order dated 24.06.2013 passed in Income Tax Appeal No.1174 of 2009 (relating to A.Y. 1994-1995) by which with respect to the same assessee M/s. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills, a partnership firm, the High Court has dismissed the said appeals and has confirmed the respective orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ITAT) deleting the short term capital gains addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.3466 OF2022 Chief Executive Officer, .Appellant(S) Zila Parishad, Thane & Ors. Versus Santosh Tukaram Tiware & Ors. ..Respondent(S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 16.12.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.4731/2021, by which, the High Court has set aside the order of termination issued to respondent No.1 herein original writ petitioner and directed the appellant Zila Parishad to grant him the benefits as regular employee 1 from the date of termination i.e., 15.07.2021, the Zila Parishad, Thane has preferred the present appeal.3. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under: - 3.1 That the Zila Parishad, Thane issued communication dated 29.03.2010 to the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti requesting for im...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8857-8858 OF2022(arising out of S.L.P (C) Nos. 19707-19708 OF2018 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RADHESHYAM & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the orders dated 20.06.2016 and 08.09.2017 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore (hereinafter referred to as High Court) in First Appeal No.131 of 2010 and MCC No.304/2017 respectively. By the said orders, the High Court allowed the MCC as well as first appeal and dismissed the appeals of the Appellant State by reducing the deduction awarded by the Reference Court from 65% towards largeness of plot + 48% towards development to 35% on the market value of Rs.1,04,64,000/- per hectare for the irrigated land and Rs. 69,76,000/- per hectare for the un-irrigated land.3. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of these appeals are as under:1. 3.1. A Notificatio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8196 OF2022(@ Diary No.24980 of 2022) The Secretary, The Department of Land and Building and Ors. Appellant(s) Versus Anjeet Singh (Dead) through LRs. and Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No.203 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the respondent No.1 herein and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question comprised in Khasra No.156 admeasuring 2 bighas, 4 biswas in village Lado Sarai, New Delhi, is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013), the 1 Department of Land and Building and the Land Acquisition Collector have preferred the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8198 OF2022(@ Diary No.27510 of 2022) Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. Appellant(s) Versus Shiv Dutt Sharma and Anr. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8248 OF2022(@ Diary No.4252 of 2021) Delhi Development Authority Appellant(s) Versus Shiv Dutt Sharma and Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition 1 (C) No.1870 of 2016 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the respondent No.1 herein and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013), the Government of NCT of Delhi as well as the Land Acquisition Collector have preferred the prese...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1933 of 2022 The TATA Power Company Limited Transmission .... Appellant Versus Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors. ....Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI A glossary of defined terms used in the judgment has been provided below: Glossary of Terms Defined Term Definition Act Electricity Act, 2003 AEMIL/ Adani Electricity Mumbai Infra Limited second respondent AEML-T Adani Electricity Mumbai Limited third respondent Transmission APTEL Appellate Tribunal for Electricity CEA Central Electricity Authority Development Guidelines Guidelines for encouraging Competition in Development of Transmission Projects DPR Detailed Progress Report EC/ fifth respondent Empowered Committee FoR Forum of Regulators GoMs GR Government of Maharashtras, Government Resolution dated 04.01.2019 HVDC High Voltage Direct Current HVDC Project 1000 MW HVDC (VSC based) link between 400 kV MSETCL K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal Nos. ____ of 2022 @ SLP(C) No.3524 of 2022 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS._7939-7940 OF2022Arising out of Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.3524-25 OF2022UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .. APPELLANTS versus SUBRATA NATH ... RESPONDENT AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS._7941-7942 OF2022Arising out of PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No.11021-22 OF2022SUBRATA NATH APPELLANT versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT HIMA KOHLI, J.1-2 By this order, we propose to decide two appeals preferred by the Union of India and the connected appeals preferred by the private respondent against the common Page 1 of 20 Civil Appeal Nos. ____ of 2022 @ SLP(C) No.3524 of 2022 judgment and order dated 9th September, 2021 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in FMA No.679 of 2019 and FMA No.680 of 2019.3. For the sake of convenience, the facts stated in the Civil Appeals shall be referred to....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8818 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.11570 of 2021) M/s. Meenakshi Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. APPELLANT Vs. M/s. Abhyudaya Green Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA , J.Leave granted.2. This Civil Appeal has been filed by assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 12.02.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad in Arbitration Application No.55 of 2020 whereby the High Court dismissed the application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1996, for the sake of convenience) filed by the appellant herein. 23. The appellant herein M/s. Meenakshi Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in the business of producing power through running and operating thermal/solar/hydro power plants. The respondent No.1 M/s. Abhyudaya Green Economic Zones Pvt. Ltd. is the owner ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8714 OF2022(Arising Out of SLP (CIVIL) NO.18607 OF2004 KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JSW ENERGY LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS JINDAL THERMAL POWER COMPANY LIMITED & JINDAL TRACTABEL POWER COMPANY LIMITED) & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) With CIVIL APPEAL NO.8715 OF2022(Arising Out of SLP (CIVIL) NO.23793 OF2004 KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JINDAL THERMAL POWER COMPANY LIMITED & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Leave granted. Being connected, the appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment. 12. The appellant, in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.18607/04, is the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited and hereinafter referred to as the appellant.3. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has allowed Miscellaneous First Appeal No.4795 of 2002 filed by the first respondent herein, viz., JSW Energy Ltd., ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 872728 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C.) NOs. 170171 OF2019 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER & ANR. ..APPELLANT(s) VERSUS ISMAIL BHAI AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 872932 OF2022ARISING OUT OF SLP (C.) NOs.562932 OF2018ISMAIL BHAI & OTHERS ..APPELLANT(s) VERSUS THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) ETC. ..RESPONDENT(s) With CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 873334 OF2022ARISING OUT OF SLP (C.) NOs. 2215152 OF2018FAKHRUDDIN ALI ..APPELLANT VERSUS THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER) & ANR. ..RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari, J.1 Leave granted.2. The present case is having history of repeated litigation by land owners to get compensation of the land owned by them. The land owners land admeasuring area of Ac 3.23 guntas in Survey No.268 of Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was sought to be acquired for the purpose of extension of th...
Tag this Judgment!