Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 5582 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 11781 of 2019) Chandan Banerjee & Ors ....Appellants Versus Krishna Prosad Ghosh & Ors. .... Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J Index A Facts ................................................................................................................... 2 B Submissions of parties ..................................................................................... 9 C Legal Position .................................................................................................. 12 D Analysis ........................................................................................................... 22 E Conclusion....................................................................................................... 29 1 PART A31 The appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dated 25 January 2019. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 [NONREPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CIVIL APPEAL No.5799 OF2021New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Ors ..Appellant(s) Versus 24 Oranges Lab LLP & Anr. ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 31.07.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition (C) No.27632 of 2014 by which the High Court has allowed the said Writ Petition preferred by the respondents herein original writ petitioners by which the High Court has disposed of the said writ petition by observing that in view of the subsequent 2 execution of the lease deed in favour of the respondents herein original writ petitioners on 21.10.2014 determining the market value of the plot in question at Rs.5900/ per sq.meter, the original respondent NOIDA has preferred the present appeal.2. Shri Sourav Roy, Learned Counsel has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Learned Advocate app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 58235824 OF2021[Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 99249925 of 2019]. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS EMTA COAL LIMITED ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 58255826 OF2021[Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.1438414385 of 2021]. DBLVPR CONSORTIUM THROUGH AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS EMTA COAL LIMITED AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.11. Leave granted.2. A short question relating to interpretation of Section 11 of the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) which is an outcome of the judgment of this Court in the case of Manohar Lal Sharma v. Principal Secretary and Others1 (hereinafter referred to as Manohar Lal SharmaI) and an ancillary question pertaining to scope of judicial review of an administrative action of the State Authority arise for consideration in these appeals.3. These appeals...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[email protected].(Crl.)Nos.11140-11141 of 2019 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 10401041 OF2021[Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)Nos.1114011141 of 2019]. Kala Singh @ Gurnam Singh ..Appellant Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are filed against the final judgment and orders dated 08.02.2019 and 01.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.713 of 2003. High Court has modified the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 PartI r/w Section 34, IPC, and sentenced to 12 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/. The conviction under Section 201 IPC was maintained.3. It is alleged that, the appellant and the deceased had a sudden fight as the deceased had stolen the pigeon of the appellant 1 [email protected].(Crl.)Nos.11140-11141 of 2019 and in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel, the coaccused (Kehar Singh) who h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5848 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.24095 OF2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DALBIR SINGH .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The order dated 11.4.2019 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal whereby the order of dismissal passed by the Competent Authority on 24.5.2014, appellate order dated 9.10.2014, and revisional order dated 13.2.2015 were set aside. The respondent1 was hence directed to be reinstated and also was found entitled to arrears of pay from the date of dismissal of service till the date he actually joins the duty.3. The writ petitioner was a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). An FIR No.16/1993 was lodged 1 Hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioner 1 against the writ petitioner for an offence under Section 302, 307...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 58195822 OF2021[Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 27792782 of 2019]. RAJENDRA BAJORIA AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HEMANT KUMAR JALAN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals challenge the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta dated 14th September 2018, thereby allowing the appeals being APO Nos. 491 and 520 of 2017 filed by the respondentsdefendants, challenging the order passed by the Single Judge of the High Court of Calcutta dated 22nd September 2017. Vide the said order dated 22nd September 2017, the Single Judge had 1 dismissed G.A. Nos.1688 and 1571 of 2017 filed by the original defendants, seeking dismissal of the suit, alternatively for rejection of the plaint as well as for revocation of the leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent in the instant suit being C.S. No.79 of 2017.3. A partnership firm ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5720 OF2021KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE ..APPELLANT(S) DEVELOPMENT LIMITED VERSUS T.P. NATARAJA & ORS. ..RESPONDENT(S) With CIVIL APPEAL No.5721 OF2021KARNATAKA RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE ..APPELLANT(S) DEVELOPMENT LIMITED & ANR. VERSUS M.C. SUBRAMANIAM REDDY. ..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 11.03.2019 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Regular First Appeal (RFA) No.1674 of 2013, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by respondent No.1 herein 1 employee and has quashed and set aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court consequently dismissing the suit filed by respondent No.1 herein original plaintiff declaring the date of birth of employee 24.01.1961, the original defendant Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (hereinafter referred to as ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5811-5814/2021 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NOS.26435-26438/2019) MEDINI. C & ORS. ETC. ETC. ..APPELLANT(S) VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. ETC. ETC. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.5815-5816/2021 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO.14959-60/2021 @ DIARY NO.41354/2019) B.H. SREELA ..APPELLANT(S) VS. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA J.Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition Diary No.41354/2019 is condoned.2. Leave granted.3. These appeals by special leave have been filed by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 07.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala in R.P. No.155/2018 filed in W.P.(C) No.29029/2010; R.P. No.156/2018 in O.P.(CAT) No.20/2010; and order dated 10.10.2019 in W.P.(C) No.29029/2010 and O.P.(CAT) 2 No.20/2020; and order dated 07.08.2018 in R.P. No.145/2018 in O.P.(CAT) No.21 of 2010. By the said order dated 07.08.2018, the H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5847 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (C) No.33865 OF2018 MATADIN SURAJMAL RAJORIA (DECEASED) THROUGH SOLE LEGATEE LALITA SATYANARAYAN KHANDELAWAL APPELLANT(S) (Plaintiff) VERSUS RAMDWAR MAHAVIR PANDE (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (Defendants) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Heard Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, learned senior counsel for the appellant. The respondents(defendants) are represented by Mr. V.K. Shukla, learned senior counsel.2. Leave granted. The appellant now (represented by his daughter) filed the Civil Suit No.332/2003 alleging encroachment by the two defendants namely Ramdwar 1 Mahavir Pande and Sudamadevi Pande. The plaintiffs contention in the Suit was that on 28.12.1995, he had purchased land (measuring 1 Hectre 62 Acres) from Survey No.25 within the municipal limits of Amravati, for consideration of Rs.2,10,000/. The sale deed (Exhibit47) was executed through the plaintiffs registered P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.313-314/2020 INDRAPAL SINGH AND OTHERS ..APPELLANT(S) VS. STATE OF U.P. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA J.These appeals have been preferred by the three appellants-accused being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 31.07.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal Nos.2095 of 1998 and Criminal Appeal No.2177 of 1998. The High court dismissed the aforesaid appeals, and confirmed the judgment and order dated 28.09.1998 in Sessions Trial No.10/96 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Jalaun at Orai, by which, the accused-appellants were convicted for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, theIPC) against Atar Singh, Shivpal Singh and Keshbhan Singh and have been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. They 1 have also been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC.2. The case of the Pro...
Tag this Judgment!