Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CIVIL APPEAL No.5122 OF2021The Director of Treasuries in Karnataka & Anr. .. Appellants Versus V. Somyashree .. Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment and Order dated 17.12.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Petition No.5609/2017 by which the High Court has allowed the said Writ Petition preferred by the respondent herein and has 2 quashed and set aside the order dated 09.12.2015 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru in Application No.6396 of 2015 and consequently has directed the appellants herein to consider the application of the respondent herein original writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as original petitioner) for grant of compassionate appointment, the original respondent has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under: That one Smt. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 4810 of 2021 Union of India & Ors. ....Appellants Versus VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd. .... Respondents With Civil Appeal No 4809 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4811 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4807 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4767 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4804 of 2021 1 With Civil Appeal No 4806 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4802 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4783 of 2021 With Civil Appeal Nos 4775-4781 of 2021 With Civil Appeal Nos 4769-4774 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4805 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No 4808 of 2021 With Civil Appeal Nos 4764-4765 of 2021 And With Writ Petition (C) 489 of 2021 2 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Index A Introduction...................................................................................................... 4 B Factual Backdrop ............................................................................................ 5 C Statutory Provisio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.990 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6381 of 2020) RAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF U. P. & ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.Leave granted. This is yet another case where summons issued purporting to invoke power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) has brought the newly summoned person to this Court. FIR came to be lodged on 27.06.2015 by the second respondent before us. It is inter alia alleged in the FIR that her husband(deceased) told her that he is leaving for work to meet the appellant. There is, in fact, no dispute that the deceased was the driver of the appellant. In the FIR, it is also stated that at 2 p.m., he called and 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.990 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6381 of 2020) informed the second respondent-his wife that he is going to Gola and shall return by evening. It is thereafter her case that her h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5667 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (C) No.2815 OF2020 UTTAR PRADESH JAL VIDYUT .. APPELLANT (S)NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS BALBIR SINGH .. RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.Leave granted.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 26.11.2019 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition No.1314 of 2014 (M/S) by which the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition preferred by the appellants herein without entering into the merits of the case, the original writ petitioner has preferred the present appeal. 12. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under: That the respondent herein raised an industrial dispute challenging his termination dated 15.06.1996. The dispute was referred to the labour court. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dehradun, passed an award dated 31.05.1997 holding that the termination order is ill...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 38753876 OF2009Ramesh Kumar .. Appellant(s) Versus Bhatinda Integrated Cooperative Cotton Spinning Mill and Ors. .. Respondent(s) With CIVIL APPEAL No.5669 OF2021(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.9470 of 2010) Bant Singh and Ors. .. Appellant(s) Versus The State of Punjab & Ors. .. Respondent(s) With CIVIL APPEAL No.5670 OF2021(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C)No.15117 of 2010) Gurbachan Singh (D) By LRs and Anr. ..Appellant(s) Versus The State of Punjab and Ors. ..Respondent(s) With 2 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.91859196 of 2017 Gurjant Singh & Anr. etc. etc. ..Appellant(s) Versus The State of Punjab through Chief Secretary, Department of Cooperation and Ors. ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.Civil Appeal Nos. 38753876 OF20091. Arising out of the impugned common judgment and order dated 19.09.2008 passed by the High Court in RFA No.3476 of 1999 filed by the original claimants for en...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 [REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13520 OF2021Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Ajay Sales & Suppliers Respondent(s) With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13543 of 2021 Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Anuj Associates Respondent(s) With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13663 of 2021 Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Parth Tours & Logistics Solutions Respondent(s) With 2 Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13632 of 2021 Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Ajay Sales & Suppliers Respondent(s) With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.13870 of 2021 Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited & Ors. Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Anuj Associates Respondent(s) JUDGMENT1 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned orders passed by the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.5627 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.4115 of 2019) Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. .... Appellant(s) Versus Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. . Respondent (s) W I T H Civil Appeal No.5628 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.8311 of 2019) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. Whether in exercise of its power under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, the 1996 Act), the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court was right in interfering with the award dated 11.05.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in favour of the Appellant - Delhi 1 | Pa ge Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, DAMEPL or the Concessionaire), is the question that arises for consideration in these Appeals.2. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter, DMRC), a joint venture of the Government of India and the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, proposed implementat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9606 OF2011SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2021[Arising out of SLP(C) No.32761 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.9609 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9610 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9611 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9615 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9608 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9612 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9614 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9613 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.9607 OF2011Page 1 of 22 CIVIL APPEAL No.3367 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.2963 OF2012JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Leave granted in SLP(C) No.32761/2018 for analogous consideration with the related appeals.2. The question of law to be answered in the present batch of appeals is on interpretation of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act (for short the Act) and the same reads as follows: Whether proportionate disallowance of interest paid by the banks is called for under Section 14A of Income Tax Act for investments made in t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 56115612 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 3624736248 of 2016) BHUPENDRA RAMDHAN PAWAR .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, NAGPUR AND ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5613 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13859 of 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5614 OF2021(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 13874 of 2019) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.Civil Appeals @ SLP(Civil) Nos. 3624736248 of 2016 1. Leave granted. 12. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd October, 2015 passed by the High Court of Bombay determining the compensation payable to the appellant in reference to the acquisition proceedings which were initiated pursuant to a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(hereinafter being referred to as the Act) dated 14th August, 1997.3. The total land admeasuring 9 hectares and 98 ares situated at Mouza Khandala,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5033-5034 OF2009K.N. NAGARAJAPPA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS H. NARASIMHA REDDY ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In these appeals by Special Leave, a common judgment - in two second appeals1 rendered by the Karnataka High Court- reversing the decree of the first appellate court, has been challenged.2. The facts relevant for the purposes of this case are that the registered sale deeds were executed on 28.05.1973 in respect of distinct parcels of land. On the same day, one of the transactions related to the sale of three parcels, which is survey No.36/1 (28 guntas); survey no.37 (1 acre 30 guntas) and survey no.28/2 (13 guntas)- collectively called the suit lands by common sale deed exhibited as Ex-1 before the trial court. This document is not in dispute. In OS No.20/1985, the plaintiff/respondent and purchaser herein filed a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possessio...
Tag this Judgment!