Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.577 OF2020[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3171 of 2019]. Stalin .. Appellant Versus State represented by the Inspector of Police .. Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 18.01.2017 passed by the Madurai Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal (MD) No.122 of 2016 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and has confirmed the Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli in Sessions Case 2 No.354 of 2012, convicting the appellant herein the original accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, the original accused has preferred the present appeal.3. At the outset, it is required to be noted that vide order dated 01.04.2019, this Court has issued a notice in the present appeal lim...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1789 of 2020 RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS GOVERDHAN LAL SONI AND ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1812 OF2020THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHER ...APPELLANT(S) MANGLA RAM AANWALA VERSUS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.1. These appeals have been filed by Rajasthan Road Transport Corporation and others (hereinafter Page 1 of 44 referred to as Corporation) challenging the judgments dated 05.03.2018 and 30.08.2018 respectively of the Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court dismissing the D.B.Special Appeals filed by the appellants. Both the appeals having raised similar issues it shall be sufficient to refer the facts and pleadings in Civil Appeal No.1789 of 2020 for deciding both the appeals.2. Goverdhan Lal Soni, the respondent No.1 was appointed as Junior Assistant on 02.04.1974 in Rajasthan State Agro Industries ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9425 OF2019SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Appellant RAJEEV ANAND & ORS. Versus WITH Respondents CIVIL APPEAL No.1911 OF2020CIVIL APPEAL No.3112 OF2020(Diary No.45282 of 2019) R.F. NARIMAN, J.JUDGMENT1 2. Permission to file appeal granted in Diary No.45282 of 2019. In the first matter being Civil Appeal No.9425 of 2019, an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was filed by the appellant before the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the NCLT for brevity) on 16.03.2017. A loan, which was given way back in 2008, was restructured into two loans of Rs.18.86 crores by an agreement dated 01.04.2016, and the second being a loan of Rs.16.80 crores by agreement dated 24.06.2016, with an interest figure of Rs.2.72 crores, the total amount coming to Rs.38.39 crores. 1 3. To this section 7 application, a counter affidavit was filed by the corporate debtor o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3964-71 OF2007M/S BANGALORE CLUB Appellant VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX & ANR. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. In the year of grace 1868, a group of British officers banded together to start the Bangalore Club. In the year of grace 1899, one Lt. W.L.S. Churchill was put up on the Clubs list of defaulters, which numbered 17, for an amount of Rs.13/- being for an unpaid bill of the Club. The Bill never became an Act. Till date, this amount remains unpaid. Lt. W.L.S. Churchill went on to become Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain. And the Bangalore Club continues its mundane existence, the only excitement being when the tax collector knocks at the door to extract his pound of flesh. 1 2. Fast forward now from British India to free India and we come to assessment years 1981-82 and 1984-85 upto 1990-91. The question for determination in these appeals...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.575 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) No.5422 OF2015 ASHOO SURENDRANATH TEWARI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EOW, CBI & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard Mr. Subhash Jha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the respondent.3. This case arises out of an FIR that was registered on 09.12.2009 as regards a MSME Receivable Finance Scheme operated by the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI). It was found that since some vendors were complaining of delay in getting their payments, SIDBI, in consultation with Tata Motors Limited, advised the vendors of Tata Motors Limited to furnish RTGS details for 1 remittance of funds. It was found that for making payments in RTGS for various purchases made by Tata Motors Limited from one Ranflex India Pvt. Ltd. (he...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3093 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.23478 OF2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. SOMWATI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3094 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.4801 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. SANGITA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3095 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.4643 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT AZMATI KHATOON AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3096 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.5441 OF2020 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ...APPELLANT VERSUS UMARANI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH2CIVIL APPEAL NO.3097 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.6381 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. PINKI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3098 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.7556 OF2020 THE NEW IND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.562 OF2020(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.2942 of 2020) RAGHAV GUPTA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant questions his prosecution under Rule 32(e) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (hereinafter called as the Rules) framed under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short the Act).3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length. Though several grounds have been urged to challenge the prosecution, we are satisfied that the appeal can be disposed of on a single undisputed ground. The facts shall therefore be 1 stated with brevity only to the extent necessary for purposes of the present order.4. The Food Inspector purchased sealed samples of Snapple Juice Drink on 03.05.2011 for analysis. The report of the Public Analyst dated 30.05.2011, held that the sample confir...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2955 OF2020THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2902 OF2020JUDGMENT V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.1. Challenging an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as NCLAT) (i) setting aside the approval granted by the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as NCLT) to a Resolution Plan and (ii) remanding the matter back to the NCLT with a direction to have the Resolution Plan resubmitted before the Committee of Creditors, the financial creditor and the Resolution Professional have come up with these appeals. 2 2. We have heard learned counsel appearing on both sides.3. The Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., which is the financial creditor, filed an application on 04.09.2017 under Section 7 of the IBC before the NCLT against M/s. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1172 OF2019R. POORNIMA AND ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. A. Bobde, CJI.1. Persons who were appointed as District Judges (Entry Level) by way of direct recruitment vide a Government Order G.O. Ms. No.170, Home Department dated 18.02.2011 in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service have come up with this Writ Petition seeking the following reliefs: (a) Issue a Writ in the nature of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Directions, to call for records relating to the last list of names recommended by the Honble Chief Justice of High Court of Madras to the Honble Chief Justice of India for 1 appointment as Judges of Madras High Court and quash the same in so far as it relates to the names of Respondents No.5 to 23 herein and consequently direct the Honble Collegiums of the Madras High Court to consider the names of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION Non-Reportable M.A. No.1434 of 2020 In In Misc. Application Diary No.15272 of 2020 Suo Moto Contempt Petition (Criminal) No.2 of 2019 Rashid Khan Pathan AND IN THE MATTER OF: IN RE: Vijay Kurle & Ors. . Applicant .... Respondent(s) ORDER By a judgment dated 27.04.2020, the Appellant 1. herein Sh. Rashid Khan Pathan and two others, Sh. Vijay Kurle and Sh. Nilesh Ojha were held guilty of contempt for making scurrilous and scandalous allegations against the Judges of this Court. On 01.05.2020, the matter was listed for hearing the contemnors on the sentence. On that day this Court was informed that applications for recall of the judgment dated 27.04.2020 were filed. Anyhow, the matter could not be heard on 01.05.2020 due to technical 1 | P a g e reasons as connection could not be established with one of the contemnors or his counsel. After hearing the contemnors regarding the sentence on 04.05.2020, this Court found that there was no rem...
Tag this Judgment!