Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1401 OF2012SUBED ALI AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM ...RESPONDENT(S) NAVIN SINHA, J.JUDGMENT The conviction of the appellants under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, I.P.C.) by the Sessions Judge, North Lakhimpur, has been affirmed by the High Court, sentencing them to life imprisonment along with fine and a default stipulation. Thus, the present appeal by the appellants.2. The prosecution alleged that the two deceased, Abdul Motin and Abdul Barek were assaulted on 05.08.2005 at about 06.00 PM while they were returning from the market 1 on bicycles along with others. Abdul Barek died on the spot. Abdul Motin died in the hospital during the course of treatment the same night. Originally there were five named accused persons. Accused nos.3 and 5 have been acquitted giving them the benefit of doubt. We are not informed of any appeal preferred against their ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.7369 of 2019 Satish @ Sabbe ..... Petitioner(s) VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh .....Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.8326 of 2019 Surya Kant, J: JUDGMENT1 These petitions, which were heard through video conferencing, have been filed by Satish and Vikky @ Vikendra alias Virendra, seeking special leave to appeal against a common order dated 28.04.2017 of the Allahabad High Court through which their appeal against conviction under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, IPC) and consequential sentence of life imprisonment, was turned down. Page | 1 FACTS2 The undisputable facts of the case are that on the evening of 12.06.2002, when one Vishal Sarawat (the victim) was on his way to meet a friend, he was stopped by an acquaintance Ramvir Rana who asked him for a lift to his house. The unsuspecting victim walked into Ramvirs house where he was th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.455 OF2020NEETU YADAV ...PETITIONER(S) Versus SACHIN YADAV RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 The wife has come up with the above petition seeking transfer of a divorce petition bearing H.M.A. No.3200 of 2019 titled as Sachin Yadav Vs. Neetu Yadav filed by the respondenthusband on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, to the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore, Madhya Pradesh.2. Heard learned counsel on both sides. 2 3. The marriage of the petitioner with the respondent was solemnized on 21.02.2008 at Indore, Madhya Pradesh. Two children, a girl and a boy, were born in the wedlock. While the girl is now aged about 11 years, the boy is aged about 8 years.4. Admittedly, the respondenthusband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty in H.M.A case No.3200 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, South West, Dw...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO.456 OF2019KAUSHIK CHATTERJEE ...PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH Transfer Petition (Crl.) No.666 of 2019 Transfer Petition (Crl.) No.681 of 2019 JUDGMENT1 Seeking transfer of three criminal cases, all pending on the file of the Court of the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Gurugram, Haryana, to any competent Court in New Delhi, a person who is implicated as one of the accused in those three cases has come up with the above transfer petitions. 2 2. I have heard Mr. Vikas Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Deepak Thukral, learned counsel appearing for the State of Haryana and Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the de facto complainant, who is the second respondent herein.3. The petitioner herein was appointed on 04.08.2016 as the Group Chief Risk OfficerExecutive Director of the second respondent, which ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8564 OF2015STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. APPELLANTS AMIT SHRIVAS RESPONDENT Versus JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The respondent raises a claim of entitlement to compassionate appointment on account of the demise of his father late Shri Ranglal Shrivas, who was working as a Driver in the Tribal Welfare Department, Bhind, Madhya Pradesh, since 6.6.1984 till he passed away on 11.12.2009, i.e., over a period of almost 23 years.2. The claim of the respondent was predicated on the nature of employment of his late father, who was initially appointed as a work- charged employee. On 12.3.1987, he was made permanent and was paid 1 salary at a regular pay-scale. The benefits of revision of pay and krammonati (promotion) were also extended to him from time to time. On the demise of late Shri Ranglal Shrivas, he left behind an ailing wife, a son (i.e., the respondent herein) and three daughters and is stated ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.635 OF2020(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.393 of 2020) MAHESHWAR TIGGA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant assails his conviction under sections 376, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, IPC) sentencing him to seven years, one year and one month respectively with fine and a default stipulation.3. The prosecutrix, PW9 lodged FIR No.25 of 1999 on 13.04.1999 alleging that four years ago the appellant had 1 outraged her modesty at the point of a knife. He had since been promising to marry her and on that pretext continued to establish physical relations with her as husband and wife. She had also stayed at his house for fifteen days during which also he established physical relations with her. Five days prior to the lodging of the F.I.R, the appellant had established physical relations with her on 09.04.1999. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).3298 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2978 of 2020) DR. JITENDRA GUPTA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS RESPONDENT(S) DR. C. CHANDRAMOULI, IAS (SECRETARY, DoP&T, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) With Contempt of Court PetitoinNo.416 of 2020 (Dr. Jintendra Gupta vs. Dr. C. Chandramouli) ORDER ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.Leave granted.2. The appeal and contempt petition have been filed by the same person, Dr. Jitendra Gupta. The appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 24.12.2019 rejected the Contempt Case(C) No.1140 1 of 2019 filed by the appellant where contempt proceedings were requested to be initiated for violation of judgment of Division Bench dated 02.07.2019 of the High Court passed in W.P.(C)No.5648 of 2018. The contempt petition has been filed in this Court for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondent for disobedience of the order dated 03.02.2020 passed by this Court in SLP(...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1121 OF2016Anwar Ali and another Appellants Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.464 of 2012, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent The State of Himachal Pradesh and has reversed the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Court and consequently has convicted the 1 appellants original accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34, 392, 201 and 420, IPC and has sentenced the appellants herein original accused to undergo life imprisonment for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with 34, IPC, the appellants original accused have preferred the present appeal.2. That the appellants herein original accused were charg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7220-7221 OF2011BELI RAM Appellant Versus RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR. Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The sole question of law for consideration in the present appeals is whether in case of a valid driving licence, if the licence has expired, the insured is absolved of its liability.2. The facts are in a very narrow compass. The first respondent herein, met with an accident on 20.5.1999 while driving a truck owned by the appellant herein, under whom he was gainfully employed. The consequence for the first respondent was 20 per cent permanent disability. The first respondent herein filed a petition under the 1 Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Compensation Act) before the Commissioner, Sadar, Bilaspur on 17.2.1999 seeking compensation of an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-, impleading the appellant and second respondent herein the insurance company which had insured the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 3249 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 3860 of 2020 Union of India & Ors. Appellants M/S G S Chatha Rice Mills & Anr. Respondents Versus W I T H Civil Appeal No 3250 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3861 of 2020) W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3869 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3250 of 2020 W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3867 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3252 of 2020 W I T H Civil Appeal No 3253 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3865 of 2020) 1 W I T H Civil Appeal No 3262 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.5029 of 2020) W I T H Civil Appeal No 3265 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7059 of 2020) W I T H Civil Appeal No 3267 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6451 of 2020) (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7063 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3269 of 2020 W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7064 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3270 of 2020 W I T H W I T H Civil Appeal No 3271 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7057 of 2...
Tag this Judgment!