Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8696 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.23098 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS BALWAN AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in posse...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8678 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.17335 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KHUSHI MOHD. AND ANR RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8707 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.24309 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DEEN MOHAMMAD DEENU AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8692 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.19974 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MOHD. HANIF AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8711 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.24316 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHAMAN SINGH AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8641 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.1684 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KARTAR SOLANKI AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8687 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.19961 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANILJIT SINGH AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8671 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.17323 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MUKESH KOCHHAR AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8701 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.23650 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ANIL JAIN AND ORS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in pos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8724 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.23091 of 2016) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAJBIR SINGH AND ORS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a...
Tag this Judgment!