Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8503 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17610 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. PRAVEEN JAIN AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8505 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17712 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. PAWAN MATHUR & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in pos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8502 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17599 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. M/S. USHA DIE CASTING PVT.LTD. AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8507 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17716 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. AMARJEET REWARI & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8506 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17714 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. RAJINDER PRASAD & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8504 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Civil)No.17710 of 2015) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. LAJWANTI JAIN AND ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil)No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8718 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.17295 of 2016) LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT THR SECRETARY GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI, NEW DELHI AND ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DINESH KUMAR AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notif...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8645 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.4222 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RATTAN SINGH AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8690 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.19971 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DHRUB KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8573 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.28772 of 2015) |DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY |Appellant(s) | Versus |CHANDAN AGARWAL AND OTHERS |Respondent(s) | JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Leave granted. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition(C) No.8467 of 2015. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possess...
Tag this Judgment!