Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1018 OF2006Neon Laboratories Ltd. ... Appellant Versus Medical Technologies Ltd. & Ors. ... Respondents JUDGMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 This Appeal assails the Judgment dated 19.12.2005 of the Learned Single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, who returned the opinion that the Trial Court had rightly granted an injunction in favour of the Plaintiffs (Respondents before us) till the disposal of the suit. 2 Briefly stated, the Plaintiff-Respondents 1 & 2 had filed a suit for injunction, damages and account of profits. The Plaintiff-Respondents are engaged in the business of manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical products and medicinal preparation, and as pleaded by them, have acquired high reputation and goodwill in the market. Hematal Biologicals Ltd. or Core Health Care Ltd., the predecessor-in-title of Plaintiff-Respondents is stated to have introduced the molecular preparation and ge...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.537 OF2015IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.9130 OF2014SHRI RAM BAHADUR PANDEY & ANR. ... PETITIONER(S) VS. SHRI RAM DHANI PRASAD, SECRETARY, BHOTIA JAN JATI SEWA SAMITI & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. It has been submitted that the petitioners have already been appointed.2. If there is any dispute with regard to pay scale, etc. or any other service condition, it would be open to the petitioners to approach other appropriate Forum for redressal of their grievances.3. The contempt petition is dismissed with the above observations. ..............J.[ANIL R. DAVE]. ..............J.[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]. New Delhi; 1st October, 2015....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8063 of 2015 (@ SLP(C) No.15813 OF2015 Pukhrem Sharatchandra Singh ... Appellant Versus Mairembam Prithviraj @ Prithibiraj Singh ... Respondent JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.What ordinarily would have entailed dismissal of the special leave petition treating it with loathe, regard being had to the nature of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Misc. Case (E.P) No.1 of 2012 in Election Petition No.1 of 2012 as he had only adjourned the matter, but the chronology of events, the ultimate consequence that would emerge by efflux of time, the command of the provision contained in Section 86(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for brevity, the Act), every conceivable stand adopted in a dexterous manner by the respondent, the elected candidate, harbouring the notion that he singularly has the intellectual imperialism, which has the effect potentiality to frustrate and defeat the election trial, for th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8194 OF2015ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.33549 OF2014STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD APPELLANT VERSUS RABO BANK RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 9th October, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No.415 of 2014 arising out of Summons for Judgment No.238 of 2008 in Summary Suit No.1586 of 2001. By the said judgment, which is impugned herein, the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant/defendant thereby upholding the Judgment of the learned Single Judge.3. In order to adjudicate the controversy between the parties, at the outset it is necessary to cull out the facts of the case to the extent of deciding the dispute before us.4. The respondent/plaintiff is a banking institution located in Singapore and on behalf of its...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1286-1287 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 1753-54 of 2015) Sudhir Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1288 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.2365 of 2015) Chandrakant Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and another Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1289 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.2774 of 2015) Chandrakant Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and another Respondents JUDGMENT Prafulla C. Pant, J.Leave granted. All these four appeals are directed against common order dated 29.1.2015, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench Aurangabad, in Criminal Application Nos. 4526 of 2013, 4527 of 2013, 4528 of 2013 and 4529 of 2013 whereby anticipatory bail granted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, to the appellants in connection with C.R. Nos. 71 of 2013 and 73 of 2013, registered at Police Station Dharangao...
Tag this Judgment!