Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8378 OF2015[Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.29250 of 2008]. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .. APPELLANTS VERSUS NORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD. .. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.1 Leave granted. 2 The Appellant, State of Haryana, is assailing the Judgment dated 11.12.2007 passed by the High Court of Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No.3750 of 2005 whereby the Notice to resume the land of the Respondent has been set aside. The Appellant State has been directed to comply with the principles of natural justice as perceived by the High Court, and, in consonance with its tenets, rehear the Respondent as well as the subsequent purchasers, and thereafter to decide the issue of resumption of the subject land by the Appellant State. 3 It is unfortunate, and indeed remarkable, that the fate of the subject agricultural land, measuring 358 kanals and 7 marlas, located in village Sankhol of Tehsil Bahadurgarh of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6975 OF2009Jagdish Lal Gambhir ....Appellant Versus Punjab National Bank & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24th July, 2006 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in FMA No.388 of 2001.2. The issue for consideration is whether the termination of the services of the appellant Gambhir was in any manner vitiated. In our opinion, the question requires to be answered in the negative and we uphold the judgment and order of the Division Bench confirming the dismissal of the writ petition filed by Gambhir.3. Gambhir was working as an Assistant General Manager in the Hindustan Commercial Bank Limited. This bank was amalgamated with the Punjab National Bank on 19th December, 1986. On amalgamation, the services of 28 or 29 officials of the Hindustan Commercial Bank including Gambhir were not taken over by the Punjab Na...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6930-6931 OF2005|M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. & ANOTHER ECC |.....APPELLANT(S) | |CONSTRUCTION GROUP | | |VERSUS | | |COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD |.....RESPONDENT(S) | W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.2121 OF2006A N D CIVIL APPEAL No.6138 OF2008JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.In the first two appeals, i.e. Civil Appeal Nos. 6930-6931 of 2004, the assessee is M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'L&T'). Two appeals are filed by L&T assailing the orders dated April 28, 2005 and October 24, 2005 passed by the Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, 'CESTAT') whereby it held that L&T was not entitled to exemption on the goods known as 'Ready Mix Concrete' (for short, 'RMC') under Notification No.4/1997-CE dated March 01, 1997 as the said Notification exempted 'Concrete Mix' (for short, 'CM') and not RMC. In the other appeal, wherein the assess...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE (CIVIL) No.6393 OF2012|VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. |.....RESPONDENT(S) | JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Though, the issue raised in this Special Leave Petition is very short and in a narrow campus, it has a chequered history. The question is only as to whether the petitioner is entitled to full salary from June 05, 1996. However, the background facts under which the issues have cropped up for discussion need to be recapitulated. Eschewing the unnecessary details, we confine the narration to only those facts which are absolutely essential and relevant to decide the controversy at hand. The petitioner herein, after emerging as a successful candidate in the Civil Services Examination, was selected in the Indian Administrative Service ('IAS') and was allocated to Maharashtra cadre, where he joined on September 01, 1982. There were certain jerks and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
(REPORTABLE) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8275 OF2015[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) No.12831 OF2015 PURNIMA MANTHENA AND ANOTHER ..APPELLANTS VERSUS DR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8276 OF2015[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) No.12835 OF2015MAHIMA DATLA ..APPELLANT VERSUS DR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8277 OF2015[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) No.20338 OF2015G.V. RAO ..APPELLANT VERSUS DR. RENUKA DATLA & OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AMITAVA ROY,J.Leave granted.2. The steeled stand off encased in the decision impugned, projects the members of a family, daughters against their mother in particular, in a combative formation in their bid to wrest the reins of a company, Biological E. Limited (for short, hereinafter to be referred to as the company) engaged in the business of pharmaceutical products and vaccines. The differences that had surfaced soon after the demise of Dr. Vijay Kumar Datla, the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 1294-1295 OF2015(@ SLP(Crl) Nos. 8567-8568 of 2015) State through Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau ... Appellant Versus Mushtaq Ahmad Etc. ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.In this appeal, by special leave, the State of Jammu and Kashmir has called in question the legal propriety of the judgment and order passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 35 and 36 of 2009 whereby the High Court has converted the conviction recorded by the learned trial Judge holding the accused respondents guilty of the offence punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity, the NDPS Act) and sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 12 years and further to pay a fine of Rs.2 lakhs each and in case of default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for period of one year to one under Section 8 read with Section 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURSIDCITION CIVIL APPEAL No.8427 OF2014Ramesh Chand (Dead) through L.Rs. Appellant Versus Asruddin (Dead) through LRs and another Respondents JUDGMENT Prafulla C. Pant, J.This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 22.01.2014, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Regular Second Appeal No.1344 of 2011 (O&M) whereby said court has dismissed the appeal, and affirmed the decree passed by the first appellate court regarding specific performance of contract, in a suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers on record. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff/respondent No.1 Asaruddin entered into an agreement with defendant No.1/ appellant Ramesh Chand on 21.06.2004, whereby the appellant agreed to sell his land measuring 12 kanals, 16 marlas, situated in Village Mohammed Nagar, Tehsil Ferozpur Jhirka, District Gurgaon, to the respondent No.1 for an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1314 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (Crl.) No.10250 OF2014 DINESH LAL APPELLANT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. This criminal appeal by special leave is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 3.7.2013 passed in Crl. A. No.153 of 2010 by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital whereby it affirmed the judgment and order dated 10.6.2010 passed by the District & Sessions Court, Tehri Garhwal, New Tehri (for short the the Trial Court) in Sessions Case No.16 of 2009, convicting the appellant herein for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced him to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and two years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence punishable under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1315 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl) No.7954 of 2014) SATYA PAL SINGH APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. This criminal appeal by special leave is directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 04.03.2014 passed in Criminal Appeal No.547 of 2013 by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior whereby the High Court has upheld the decision of the Sessions Court, Bhind, M.P. (the trial court) in Sessions Case No.293/2010 by acquitting all the accused i.e. respondent nos. 2 to 6 herein. The appellant herein made a written complaint dated 19.07.2010 regarding the death of his daughter, Ranjana (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) to the Addl. Superintendent of Police, Bhind, M.P. The FIR was registered on 27.07.2010. The trial court after the examination of evidence on record passed the judgment and order dated 13.06.2013 acquitting all the accu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8315 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)No.34843/2014) KHUSHBIR SINGH ... APPELLANT(S) VS. GURDEEP SINGH & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Heard the learned counsel.2. Leave granted.3. Looking at the facts of the case, the prayer, so far as it relates to amendment application about change of name from the father to the name of the grandfather is concerned, shall stand allowed.4. It would be open to the concerned parties to lead evidence on the amended suit.5. The impugned judgment is set aside and the appeal is disposed of as allowed to the above extent with no order as to costs. ..............J.[ANIL R. DAVE]. ..............J.[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]. New Delhi; 5th October, 2015....
Tag this Judgment!