Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9873 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(C) No.17881 of 2008) U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS GURCHARAN SINGH & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS1JUDGMENT1ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment delivered in Civil Writ Petition No.7006-CAT of 2003 dated 20th March, 2008 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, this appeal has been filed by the employer Union Territory of Chandigarh and others.3. The facts giving rise to the present litigation in a nut-shell are as under: The respondent was appointed as a Clerk by the appellant Chandigarh Transport Undertaking on the quota reserved for ex-servicemen. The respondent had rendered his services to the Indian Army as a Combatant Clerk upto 31st January, 1990, till the date when he was discharged from the Indian Army. Upon his appointment as a Clerk under an office order dated 2nd September, 1992, his pay had been fixed an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.374 OF2012Arun Kumar Agrawal ...Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by one Mr. Arun Kumar Agrawal under Article 32 of the Constitution of India; seeks the issuance of a writ of quo warranto or any other direction against Mr. U.K. Sinha, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) and his consequential removal from the post of Chairman.2. Stated concisely, the petitioner challenges the appointment of respondent No.4 on the following grounds :- a) Mr. Sinha failed to fulfill one of the eligibility condition as laid down in sub-section (5) of Section 4 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as SEBI Act), as well as the qualification contained in Government communication, which required that the Chairman shall be a person ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9868-9869 OF2013(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NOS. 30883-30884 OF2012 GIRISH BHUSHAN GOYAL APPELLANT Versus B.H.E.L. & ANR. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9870 OF2013(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.30877 OF2012 JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant has filed two separate Civil Appeals before this Court. The Civil Appeals arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 30883-30884 of 2012 are filed questioning the correctness of the judgment and order dated 20.12.2010 passed in the Writ Petition No.129 of 2009 (S/B) and order dated 28.6.2011 passed in the Review Application No.431 of 2011 to the Writ Petition No.129 of 2009 (S/B), whereas Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.30877 of 2012 is filed against the judgment dated 22.2.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.292 of 2009 (S/B) by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital, urging various facts and legal contentions in justification of his claim.3. Through Civil App...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9866 OF2013(@ SLP (C) No.35063 of 2009) GANAPATH SINGH GANGARAM SINGH RAJPUT APPELLANT Versus GULBARGA UNIVERSITY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR & OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9867 OF2013(@ SLP (C) No.35173 of 2009) GULBARGA UNIVERSITY REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR & OTHERS APPELLANTS Versus SHIVANAND & OTHERS RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J.Ganpath Singh Gangaram Singh Rajput as also the Gulbarga University, aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 19/24th of November, 2009 of the Karnataka High Court in Writ Appeal No.3216 of 2004 quashing the appointment of aforesaid Ganpath Singh Gangaram Singh Rajput as Lecturer in MCA in the Post-graduate Department of the University, have preferred these special leave petitions. Leave granted. Short facts giving rise to the present appeals are as follows: The appellant, Gulbarga University, hereinafter referred to as the University, i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9872 OF2013(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.16112 of 2012) Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha ......Appellant Versus Dhobei Sahoo & Ors. .....Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9871 OF2013(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.15870 of 2012) Bijaya Chandra Jena Appellant Versus Dhobei Sahoo and others Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.2. Assailing the judgment and order dated 28.3.2012 passed by the High Court of Orissa, Cuttack in WP(C) No.23268 of 2011 whereby the Division Bench has quashed the appointment of the respondent No.5 herein and further directed the present appellant to recover the amount paid to the 5th respondent towards honorarium, in a public interest litigation preferred by the 1st respondent, the present appeals, one by the Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha (CESU) and the other by the aff...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1893 OF2013(Arising Out of SLP (Crl.) No.2098 of 2011) ASHA & ANR. ... APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ... RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1894 OF2013(Arising Out of SLP (Crl.) No.2924 of 2011) JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the common impugned judgment and order dated 07.01.2011 of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.1931 of 2001(Old No.1060 of 1998), whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal of the appellants and upheld their conviction and sentence of 10 years R.I. under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code (in short the IPC) awarded by the trial court. In Criminal Appeal No.1893 of 2013 the appellants are the sisters-in-law of the deceased and in Criminal Appeal No.1894 of 2013 the appellant is the father-in-law of the deceased. During pendency of the appeal before the High Court, the co-accused, Lilawati,...
Tag this Judgment!