Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2030 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5957/2013) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appellant(s) :VERSUS: DONGAR SINGH Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted.2. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. The respondent was proceeded under Section 304A of the Indian Penal code for having committed the death of one Bachhraj due to rash and negligent driving. The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Chachoda, District Guna, awarded the sentence of one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000/- to the respondent by his order dated 19.2.2007 which was left undisturbed in appeal by the Sessions Court at District Guna.3. The respondent filed a criminal revision before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The only point which was argued on behalf of the respondent in the High Court was with respect to the sentence, that the sentence be reduced to the period already undergone by the respondent by then which was only 34 da...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10753 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(C) No.31035 of 2011) The A.P.I.I. Corpn. Ltd. .....Appellant. Versus M/s. Team-Asia Lakhi Semiconductors Ltd. (in liquidation) rep. by the Official Liquidator, Hyderabad & Anr. ..Respondents 1 JUDGMENT1ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment dated 14th March, 2011 delivered by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in O.S.A.No.18 of 2008, this appeal has been filed by the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd.3. The circumstances in which the aforestated appeal has been filed are as under: The appellant is a Government Corporation which allots plots of land for the purpose of setting up industries to different persons. The plots are allotted on certain conditions and if the conditions are not fulfilled or if the entire payment is not made within the time stipulated, the allotment is cancelled an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10745 OF2013(Arising out of SLP (C) No.22280 of 2011) M/s. Paragon Rubber Industries Appellant VERSUS M/s. Pragathi Rubber Mills & Ors. ...Respondents With Civil Appeal No.10746 of 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.33453 of 2011) M/s. Pragathi Rubber Mills & Ors. Appellants VERSUS M/s. Paragon Rubber Industries ...Respondent JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This judgment shall dispose of C.A.No.10745 of 2013 @ SLP (C) No.22280 of 2011 and C.A.No.10746 of 2013 @ SLP (C) No.33453 of 2011. Both the appeals impugn the judgment of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 15th March, 2011, rendered in Civil Revision Petition No.1417 of 2004.3. Since these are cross appeals, the parties shall be referred to as plaintiff and defendant. The facts at the centre of this controversy are as follows: The Plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of footwear si...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10751 OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.18405 of 2012) Maa Binda Express Carrier and Anr. Appellants Versus Northeast Frontier Railway and Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 6th June, 2012 passed by a Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court whereby Writ Appeal (C) No.79 of 2012 has been allowed; judgment and order dated 4th February, 2012 passed by a Single Bench of that Court set aside and Writ Petition (C) No.4668 of 2011 filed by the appellants dismissed.3. In terms of a notice dated 12th July, 2011 Divisional Commercial Manager, Tinsukia invited tenders for the grant of a three year lease of 23 tonnes of space in VPH (Parcel Van) on train No.15960/15959 Kamrup Express. Among those who responded to the tender notice was the appellant herein who offered a sum of Rs.1,46,872/- per trip for the proposed lease. The tender...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
ITEM NO.1B COURT NO.9 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.10747/2013 @ Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31690/2011 PURUSHOTHAM Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal No.10748/2013 @ SLP(C) No.31695 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.10749/2013 @ SLP(C) No.33184 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.10750/2013 @ SLP(C) No.33319 of 2011 Date:29. 11/2013 These matters were called on for pronouncement of Judgment today. For Petitioner(s) Dr. Sushil Balwada,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan For Respondent(s) Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni,Adv. Ms. Anitha Shenoy ,Adv Mr. Rajesh Mahale ,Adv Mr. Rajeev Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER Leave granted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surinder Singh Nijjar pronounced the Judgment of the Bench comprising His Lordship and Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri. For the reasons recorded in the signed Repor...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1248 OF2007Himmat Singh and others ....Appellants versus State of M.P. and another ....Respondents JUDGMENT G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Feeling dissatisfied with the meagre enhancement granted by the learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the amount of compensation determined by II Additional District Judge, Shivpuri (hereinafter described as, the Reference Court), the appellants have filed this appeal.2. By letter dated 27.12.1988, Collector, Shivpuri proposed the acquisition of 4.421 hectares land for construction of link road near Guna- Shivpuri Rail Line. However, even before issue of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act), possession of the land was taken by the officers of the Central Railway and link road was constructed.3. On 16.1.1989, the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act was published. However, the same was can...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3130-3131 OF2008AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE APPELLANT Versus BIOTOR INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.These appeals have been directed against the common judgment and order dated 24.04.2007 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 139 of 2006 and 195 of 2006 in Special Civil Application No.13606 of 2005 with Civil Application No.514 of 2006 and Civil Application No.1380 of 2006 filed by the appellant-Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Baroda (for short APMC) as it is aggrieved by the dismissal of its Letters Patent Appeal No.195 of 2006. The High Court allowed Letters Patent Appeal No.139 of 2006 preferred by the respondent-Company. Both the Letters Patent Appeals were filed against the order dated 22.12.2005 of learned single Judge passed in Special Civil Application No.13606 of 2005 whereby the learned single Judg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1247 OF2007Himmat Singh and others ....Appellants versus State of M.P. and another ....Respondents JUDGMENT G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. Feeling dissatisfied with the meagre enhancement granted by the learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the amount of compensation determined by II Additional District Judge, Shivpuri (hereinafter described as, the Reference Court), the appellants have filed this appeal.2. By notification dated 28.5.1987 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act), which was published on 12.6.1987, the Government of Madhya Pradesh acquired the appellants land measuring 3.627 hectares comprised in Survey Nos.2, 10, 20, 22, 46, 48 and 166 of Village Jagatpur, Tehsil Kolaras, District Shivpuri for construction of Broad Gauge Rail Line by the Central Railway. Another parcel of land measuring 0.951 hectares comprised in Survey No.18, of whic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10722 OF2013(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.3038 of 2008) Dr. Mrs. Poonam Tandon . Appellant Versus The Chancellor, Lucknow University & Ors . Respondents JUDGMENT S. A. BOBDE, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant has challenged the order of the Allahabad High Court, by which the High Court has set aside the order of the Chancellor dated 13th March 2007 passed under Section 31(8)(a) of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). By the said order, the Chancellor had approved the appointment of the appellant by holding that the appellant possessed the prescribed and required qualification for the post of Professor of Physics (Specialization in Experimental Solid State). The Chancellor had passed this order on a reference made under Section 31(8) (a) of the Act.3. The appellant was selected by the duly constituted Selection Committee consisting of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1921-1922 OF2010S.K. RATTAN Appellant(s) :VERSUS: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT H.L. GOKHALE, J.: Leave granted.2. These appeals by special leave seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 21st May, 2009 rendered by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No.2080 of 2003 and subsequent order dated 31.7.2009 passed by that Court in Review Petition No.277 of 2009 dismissing both of them. The aforesaid Writ Petition (Civil) No.2080 of 2003 sought to challenge the judgment and order rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal on 1st October, 2001 in O.A. No.1436 of 2000 by which the Original Application filed by the appellant herein was dismissed.3. The short facts leading to these appeals are this wise. The appellant joined his services as Sub Inspector of Police in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in 1964 and was subsequently promoted to t...
Tag this Judgment!