Sikkim Court August 2012 Judgments
Champa Devi Sharma and Another Vs. State of Sikkim
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
1. Mr. Karma Thinlay, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the State respondent. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. This petition has been filed seeking quashment of the criminal proceedings pending in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, East Sikkim at Gangtok under Section 354, Cr. P. C. These proceedings arise out of an FIR No.69 of 2011 registered on 13-6-2011 with the Sadar Police Station, Gangtok under Sections 447/354/323 of the I. P. C. 4. The petitioner No.2, who was working in the office of the husband of petitioner No.1, had lodged the aforementioned FIR against the petitioner No.1, The police on Investigation filed the charge-sheet under abovementioned Sections. However, at the time of framing the charge, the trial Court vide its order dated 19-6-2012 framed the charge only under Section 354, IPC and the case was set for trial. 5. It seems that during the pendency of the criminal proceedings, the parties entered into a mutua...
Tag this Judgment!Pem Cheki Lepcha Vs. Sherap Bhutia
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
Oral: Wangdi, J. 1. This matter has been listed today under orders of this Court as it was found that in the statement of pending cases submitted by the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, West Sikkim at Gyalshing, it was indicated that the reason for Private Complaint Case No.4 of 2007 not having been disposed by it thus far was due to order of stay of this Court dated 01-09-2009. Upon perusal of the records of this case, this Court subsequently on 16-11-2009 had also passed the following orders:- BEFORE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.P.WANGDI, JUDGE 03. 16.11.09 Present : Mr. A.K. Upadhyaya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ashim Chettri and Mr. Dhurba Tewari, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. N. Rai, Advocate with Ms. Jyoti Kharka, Advocate along with Mr. Sherpa Bhutia, the respondent in person. Heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties. It has been submitted by Mr. N. Rai, learned Advocate, that it would be expedient if the Criminal Case remains adjourned sine die pending disposal of the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›