Sikkim Court September 2006 Judgments
Ram Kumar Goyel and ors. Vs. Bhuwan Singh Pradhan
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-26-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Sik39
ORDERA.P. Subba, J.1. Since all the above Miscellaneous Applications arise out of similar facts and raise identical questions of law, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. All the above applications have been filed by one Shri R. K. Goyel, resident of Jorthang, South Sikkim and two (2) others Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay of 510 days in filing appeals under Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the ex parte decrees dated 15-12-2003 passed by the learned District Judge, Special Division-II at Gangtok in Civil Suit. Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of 2002.3. It is not necessary to narrate facts of the case in detail for the purpose of disposing of the present applications. Suffice it to say that the Civil Suits Nos. 1 of 1992, 2 of 1992, 3 of 1992, 4 of 1992, 5 of 1992 and 6 of 1992 filed by each of the respondents separately in the Court of the Ld. Civil Judge, (E) at Gangtok, for declarat...
Tag this Judgment!Balchand Sarda Vs. State of Sikkim, Represented by Its Chief Secretary ...
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-21-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Sik29
Binod Kumar Roy, C.J.1. The Petitioner has come up, in substance, for granting following reliefs:(i) To quash the NIT (Notice Inviting Tender) dated 18-4-2006 published in the Newspaper Sikkim Herald dated 25-4-2006 (as contained in Annexure 1).(ii) To quash the List of Contractors dated 29-5-2006 (as contained in Annexure 10).(iii) To stay operation of the impugned NIT as well as the list of contractors and/or the Respondent Authorities be directed not to award any work under the PMGSY (Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana) works on the basis of the NIT in question.2. The Petitioner's case, in short, is as follows:(i) He is a Senior Registered Class I A Contractor of Sikkim Public Works Department (SPWD) who has undertaken several prestigious works within and outside the State of Sikkim, as enumerated in Paragraph 3, which were accepted by the authorities. Thereby he is entitled to be awarded works of Rs. 1 crore and above.(ii) Pursuant to the impugned NIT he had deposited Rs. 2,30,000/ f...
Tag this Judgment!Haobijom Rita Devi Vs. Sikkim Manipal University of Health, Medical an ...
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-14-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Sik6
ORDER1. In terms of our Order dated August 31, 2006 we proceed to dispose of this Writ Petition.2. The Petitioner has come up with a prayer for issuing a writ in nature of mandamus or any appropriate writ or direction to the Respondents to allow her to attend counselling and get her admitted in the MBBS Programme, 2006.3. Her case is as follows:3.1 The Petitioner was born on 3.5.1987.3.2 She resides in a remote area of District Imphal where there is no Internet facility.3.3 Pursuant to a notification made for selection of M.B.B.S. Course in the Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences (hereinafter referred to SMIMS) she applied for the Combined Entrance Test Examination complying with the formalities along with her Telephone Number for future communication.3.4 Through a call letter dated August 14, 2006, which was dispatched through Speed Post on August 18,2006 (its copy appended as Annexure A/3 and the Speed Post Envelope appended as Annexure A/4), was received by her on August 25...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›