Sikkim Court May 2005 Judgments
Sikkim Subba Associates Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: May-31-2005
Reported in: [2005]276ITR456(Sikkim)
N. Surjamani Singh, Actg. C.J.1. These two writ petitions involved almost the same and similar common question of facts and law and, as such, this Court proposes to dispose of these two writ petitions by this common judgment.2. These two writ petitions are directed against the issuance of warrant of authorisation dt. 17th June, 1999 to 23rd June, 1999, including warrant of authorisation dt. 18th June, 1999, by the respondents against the petitioners under Section 132 of the IT Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', for conducting search and seizure in the premises of the petitioners and the consequent issuance of impugned notice dt. 20th Feb., 2001 under Section 158BC of the Act directing the petitioners to file returns, etc., by treating the search and seizure operations as valid; for which the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed that such warrant of authorisation and the impugned notices dt. 20th Feb., 2001 issued under Section 158BC of the Act, be quashed as the same is u...
Tag this Judgment!United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chandi Rai and anr.
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: May-26-2005
Reported in: I(2006)ACC498; 2005ACJ1992; AIR2006Sik11
A.P. Subba, J.1.Since both these appeals involve common question of law about maintainability of the appeals filed by the insurance company under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 without complying with the provisions of Section 170 of the same Act they are heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment.2. The M.A.C. Appeal No. 2 of 2004 filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. is directed against the order dated 6.2.2004 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, East and North, Gangtok in the M.A.C.T. Case No. 26 of 2003 granting a sum of Rs. 2,21,800 as compensation in favour of the claimant who is respondent No. 1 herein and the M.A.C. Appeal No. 3 of 2004 filed by National Insurance Co. Ltd. is directed against the order dated 27.2.2004 passed by the same Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, East and North, Gangtok in M.A.C.T. Case No. 23 of 2003 granting a sum of Rs. 1,77,000 as compensation in favour of the claimant who is respondent No. 1, herein.3. The brief ...
Tag this Judgment!Gopi Krishna Kakrania and anr. Vs. Mahendra Pradhan and anr.
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: May-13-2005
Reported in: I(2006)ACC350; 2005ACJ1864
A.P. Subba, J.1. Since both these appeals involve common question of law and fact, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The incident that gave rise to the cause of action for filing of the two claim petitions before M.A.C. Tribunal (South & West) against whose orders/awards both these appeals have been preferred in this court is a vehicular accident that occurred on Legship-Reshi Road, West Sikkim on 10.10.2003. It is stated that claimants' son and daughter-in-law who met with death in the said accident were travelling in the ill-fated vehicle which, was on its way from Gyalshing to Siliguri on the fateful day. Claimants filed two claim petitions separately in respect of their deceased son late Praveen Kakrania and daughter-in-law late Pragati alias Anita Kakrania before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (South & West) at Namchi against Mahendra Pradhan, respondent No. 1 the owner of the vehicle and United India Insurance Co. Ltd., the responde...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›