Sikkim Court September 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sagarmull Agarwal
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-27-2004
Reported in: AIR2007Sik33
R.K. Patra, C.J.1. The Union of India represented by the Garrison Engineer, New Cantonment, Gangtok has filed this appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging the order dated 17-9-03 passed by the Learned District Judge (East and North) Sikkim at Gangtok in Civil Misc. Case (Arbitration) No. 1 of 2003 making the award the rule of the Court.2. The matter has a chequered career. The appellant invited tender in respect of the work 'provision of special repairs to roof, joinery, floor etc. to certain buildings at New Cant, and GNR miles 2 at Gangtok'. Pursuant to such invitation the respondent submitted his tender, which on being found to be the lowest, was accepted. Contract Agreement No. GE/867/30 of 80-81 was duly executed between the parties. In course of execution of the work, different disputes cropped up which could not be settled. The Chief Engineer in letter No. 98038/SMA/ ARB/30/SZ/124/E8 dated 8-4-1997 appointed Lt. Col. P. Sengupta as the sole arbitrator to...
Birkha Bhadhur Subba and ors. Vs. State of Sikkim
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-22-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ572
ORDERN. Surjamani Singh, J.1. The judgment and order dated 4th February, 2004 passed by the Sessions Judge, East and North Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2004 is the subject-matter under challenge in this criminal revision petition filed by the present 7 accused-petitioners.2. The facts of the case, in a short compass, are as follows :-The petitioner No. 1, namely Birkha Bahadur Subba, who is a Government employee serving in the office of the District Collector, East at Gangtok as L.D.C. in connivance with one Under-Secretary of Land Revenue Department named Shri P. B. Chettri, prepared false Sikkim subject certificates in the names of the present petitioners along with one Tshering Sherpa by taking money from each of them. It is said that the present petitioners, who are seven in numbers, and the said Tshering Sherpa are not bona fide Sikkimese as the names of their parents are not recorded in old Sikkim subject register. However, they obtained Sikkim subject certificat...
MartIn Lottery Agencies Ltd. and ors. Vs. S. Manimaran, Editor, Athirs ...
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-22-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ3146
ORDERN. Surajmani Singh, J.1. The Order dated 7th April 2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim at Gangtok in Private Complaint Case No. 2 of 2004 pertaining to the territorial jurisdiction is the subject-matter under challenge in this revision petition.2. The facts of the case, in a short compass, are as follows :--The complainants, petitioners herein, filed a complaint-petition before the Court below, as against the present respondents for punishing them for committing the offence punishable under Section 500, I. P. C. by contending, inter alia, that the accused-respondents published defamatory, misleading and derogatory articles/statements in their newspaper 'Athirshtam' in its issues dated 8th October 2002, 19th October 2002, 20th October 2002 and 21st October 2002 which harmed the reputation of the complainants/petitioners. By an Order dated 15th November 2002, the learned Court below took the cognizance of the case and, was of the view that there were sufficient mater...
Smt. Mala Rana Patra Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Sep-03-2004
Reported in: AIR2005Sik27
ORDERN. Surjamani Singh, J. 1. These three cases involved common question of facts and laws and interrelated each other and, that being the position, these cases were taken up for hearing jointly and accordingly, these cases are finally disposed of with the following common judgment and order.2. The facts of the cases, in a short compass, are as follows :--i) The State Bank of India as plaintiffs, for short, the respondent Bank herein, initially instituted three money suits against the defendant Himalindia Photo Offset (Himalindia Publications Pvt. Ltd.) represented by the petitioner, Smt. Mala Rana Patra, for short the Judgment Debtor herein, under Civil Suit Nos. 60 of 1988, 61 of 1988 and 62 of 1988 which were decreed on 21st August, 2000 by the trial Court in the following order :-- '(i) Decree for Rs. 2,85,506.04 with PI and FI @ 12.5% per annum with effect from 4-5-1988 in Civil Suit No. 60 of 1988.(ii) Decree on admission for Rs. 1,48,537.98 plus PI and FI @ 12.5% per annum with...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›