Sikkim Court June 2003 Judgments
Registrar General, High Court of Sikkim Vs. Hem Lall Bhandari
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ3967
ORDERN.S. Singh, Ag. C.J.1. Heard Mr. S.P. Wangdi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. J.B. Pradhan and Mr. Karma Thinlay, Advocates for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S.K. Home Choudhury, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocate.2. In this application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant namely, Registrar General, High Court of Sikkim, Gangtok made a prayer for drawing up proceedings under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code against the respondent, Shri Hem Lall Bhandhari, an Advocate by profession by contenting, inter alia,(a) that, the respondent filed a writ petition bearing Writ Petition (C) No. 10 of 2003 before this Court intentionally making false allegations against the former Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Shri Justice R. Dayal in order to bring the High Court of Sikkim in disrepute so that the judiciary in the State may not function smoothly and independently without fear and, therefore, it is expedient in the interest ...
Tag this Judgment!Rocky Benediek and anr. Vs. State of Sikkim
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Jun-30-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ3309
ORDERN.S. Singh, Actg. C.J. 1. The order dated 5th June, 2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge (E and N), Gangtok in Criminal Case No. 11 of 2002 is the subject-matter under challenge in this revision petition.2. Pacts of the case, in a short compass, are as follows :--The present accused-petitioners, namely, Shri Rocky Benediek and Smt. Jiji Rocky and one Shri Biju Henry have been facing the trial before the learned trial Judge in respect of the charges under Sections 302 and 201, I.P.C. as against the petitioner No. 2, Smt. Jiji Rocky and charges under Section 201/34, I.P.C. as against the present petitioner No. 1, Shri Rocky Benediek and one Shri Biju Henry vide Criminal Case No. 11 of 2002 and when the trial is/was at the stage of argument, the prosecution filed the application under Section 216, Cr.P.C. for adding the charge under Section 302/34, I.P.C. as against the accused-petitioner No. 1. Shri Rocky Benediek and to add the charge under Section 34, I.P.C. against the accus...
Tag this Judgment!Pooja Fortune Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Sikkim and ors.
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Jun-24-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Sik13
ORDERN.S. Singh, Actg. C.J.1. Two writ petitions, being Writ Petition (C) No. 4 of 2002 and Writ Petition (C) No. 44 of 2001 which are similarly situated with the present writ petition, has been disposed of finally today, thus quashing the impugned tender process and related agreement entered between respondent No. 1 and/or with the respondent No. 3 with the following observations, orders and directions :--'41. For the reasons, observations and discussions made above, J am of the view that these writ petitioners could make out a case to justify interference with the impugned tender process and the appointment of the respondent No. 3 as a Marketing Agent for marketing the computerised network lottery of the Government of Sikkim and also related agreement dated 24th August 2001 and accordingly, the entire tender process thus awarding of the tender/work in favour of the respondent No. 3 and, appointment of the respondent No. 3 as Marketing Agent for the said computerized network lottery i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›