Sikkim Court April 2001 Judgments
Advocate General Vs. Ashwani Khurana
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Apr-11-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2492
Ripusudan Dayal, C.J. 1. Contempt proceedings were initiated against Ashwani Khurana, Chief Executive, M/s. K. & Co., 4-Pamposh Enclave, New Delhi-100048 on the motion having been made by the learned Advocate General, for the Contemnor having written a letter dated 13th November, 2000 to the Chief Justice of the High Court, stating that the said letter had been sent by the Contemnor whose certain matters pertaining to Sikkim Lotteries had earlier been decided by the Chief Justice and that the letter gravely scandalises the High Court with the sole objective of lowering the majesty and dignity of the Court and is also intended to influence the Chief Justice with regard to any proceedings that may be brought before the Court. Body of the letter dated 13th November, 2000, reads as under :Reg. : Current Tender of Sikkim State Lotteries.Respected Sir,It is reliably learnt that the stipulation regarding the qualification of bidder to the currently operating Two States has been reduced to One...
Tag this Judgment!Mani Kumar Thapa Vs. State of Sikkim
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Apr-10-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ876
Anup Deb, J.1. This appeal filed by Mani Kumar Thapa, is directed against the judgment of the learned Special Judge, Human Rights, South and West District, Sikkim, in Criminal (Human Rights) Case No. 6 of 1996 passed on 21st December 1999, holding, accused Holland Christopher Chhetri, who was a Deputy Superintendent of Police and Sub Divisional Police Officer of West Sikkim, since deceased, and Mani Kumar Thapa, who was a Sub-Inspector of Police, Special Branch, Sikkim Police (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), guilty of the offence punishable under Sections 364/302/201 of Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) read with Section 34 of IPC for committing the abduction and murder of one Dharma Dutta Sharma. During trial of the case, Rolland Christopher Chhetri expired on 9th October 1995 and the case against him abated and, therefore, no order of conviction and sentence was passed against him. The appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›