Wiretapping - Judgment Search Results

Jagdish Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2009(3)Raj2459

m n bhandari j 1 the matter was heard finally with the consent of the parties 2 the petitioner was...

Rita Lal Vs. Raj Kumar Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3341; 2002(3)BLJR2387; [2002(3)JCR221(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC296; 2002(6)SCALE564; (2002)7SCC614; [2002]SUPP2SCR403

order1 leave granted 2 the appellant a widow and having undergone akidney transplant initiated an eviction petition undersection 14 of...

Mitchell Vs. Forsyth

Court: US Supreme Court

..... safe streets act of 1968 in which congress attempted to fashion rules governing wiretapping and electronic surveillance that would meet the constitutional requirements for electronic surveillance enunciated ..... later firmly rejected the notion that the fourth amendment countenanced warrantless domestic security wiretapping this court found the issue sufficiently doubtful to warrant the exercise of its .....

United States Vs. Donovan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... approval from senior officials in the justice department would inevitably foreclose resort to wiretapping in various situations where investigative personnel would otherwise seek intercept authority from the ..... that post intercept notice was designed instead to assure the community that the wiretap technique is reasonably employed but even recognizing that congress placed considerable emphasis on .....

Berger Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... perjury prosecutions but retain the requirement of proving an intentional false statement wiretapping and eavesdropping in connection with the problems of securing evidence against organized ..... crime the commission considered issues relating to electronic surveillance including wiretapping and bugging the secret installation of mechanical devices at specific locations to receive .....

United States Vs. Giordano

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the circumscribed authority congress has granted in title iii for the use of wiretapping and wiretap evidence by law enforcement officers 411 u s 905 ii the united states ..... application without the facts obtained from monitoring giordano s telephone would independently support original wiretap authority the act itself forbids extensions of prior authorizations without consideration of the results .....

Benanti Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court the question presented by petitioner is whether evidence obtained as the result of wiretapping by state law enforcement officers without participation by federal authorities is admissible in a ..... second police official who testified substantially as the first admitting on direct examination that a wiretap had existed and on cross examination that the discovery of the alcohol was occasioned .....

United States Vs. Kahn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... case would allow the federal agents such total unfettered discretion by its own terms the wiretap order in this case conferred authority to intercept only communications concerning the above described ..... or appear unlikely to succeed this language however is simply designed to assure that wiretapping is not resorted to in situations where traditional investigative techniques would suffice to expose .....

U.S. Vs. Chavez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... solicitor general in chavez attorney general mitchell made the operative decision to authorize the wiretap application and signified this by sending a memorandum to assistant attorney general will ..... proposals culminating in the draft which became title iii a 1961 proposal to allow wiretapping under regulated conditions did not contain any identification requirement although it contained provisions .....

Dye Vs. New Jersey.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of state law the evidence from which the conviction resulted arose primarily from a wiretap of a telephone on the premises where petitioner was employed petitioner challenges the admissibility ..... of the wiretap product on the grounds that the judicial authorization was not in conformity with the .....