Wild Life Protection Amendment Act 2002 Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association and Other Vs. Union o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi267b; ILR1997Delhi22

19 1 g according to the learned counsel trade in wild life is antithetic to conservation and thereforee it is noxious the petitioners challenge certain amendments carried out in the wild life protection act 1972 by the amendment act no 44 of amendment act of 1986 reads as follows the wild life protection act 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals and or ivory imported before the coming into force of the amendment act 44 of 1991 the possibility of increased assault on such ivory in respect of which any offence against this act or any rule or order made there under has been manufacturers of such articles 33 amendment of section 49a in section 49a of the principal act a b in clause c it brought about changes in sections 1 2 4 6 8 12 18 19 24 33 34 35 36 38 39

G.R. Simon Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi301; 1997(41)DRJ604; (1997)117PLR66

accumulation so as to discourage and prevent illegal poaching of wild animals 12 the amending act was not a colorable exercise improve the natural environment including various lakes rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures the contention of introduction of provisions of chapter va in the wild life protection act 1972 by wild life protection amendment act 1986 together first one but was the fourth one preceded by three amendments made on 3 9 1977 5 10 1977 and 9 grounds and pleas taken for challenging the provisions of the act in the present petitions are similar we adopt the reasoning expiry of the stipulated period it becomes an offence under section 49 c 7 of the wild life protection amendment act life act of 1972 issued a notification no 1 15 86 wl 1 50 859 e dated 24 11 1986 whereby

Shyam Sunder Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT401

relate to clause c of new section 55 substituted in wild life protection amendment act 1972 53 1972 in place of issued by the government of india to the chief wild life warden to the government of the states informing them that 20th september 1991 and is known as the wild life protection amendment act 1991 in accordance of the provisions of section iiia and chapter va as the date on which the amendment act would come into force section 49b prohibiting the trader 1991 and is known as the wild life protection amendment act 1991 in accordance of the provisions of section 49b of act 1972 53 1972 in place of the words except sections 33a 44 ii o 55c chapter iiia and chapter va of the order of stay passed on 24th march 1992 8 it is no doubt true that the division bench of

Halar Utkarsh Samiti Through Prakash H. Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat Thr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)2GLR964

such permission is not necessary for the better management of wild life the effort made on behalf of the respondents to control or prohibit in keeping with the interests of wild life as he may consider necessary for the improvement of livestock protection of marine life under the provisions of wild life protection act and it has to be considered as to whether the year 1935 by the wild birds and animals protection amendment act 1935 xxvii of 1935 after independence the constitutent assembly to give meaning and life to the provisions of the act we find that such principles could certainly be made applicable could be granted the argument raised on the basis of section 24 therefore stands answered by clause ii itself and needs the constitution of india and the supreme court in para 8 of this judgment observed that it is well established that

State of Kerala Vs. The Secretary,paramekkara Devaswam

Court : Kerala

..... the wild life protection amendment act 2002 shall not be proceeded with all pending proceedings shall stand abated 3 any captive animal animal article trophy or wa 1650 14 connected cases36uncured trophy declared under sub section 1 .....

Kamla Kant Pandey Vs. Prabhagiya Van Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All136; 2005(1)AWC877

..... this judgment keeping in view the provisions of the wild life protection act section 29 in its amended form would apply with full force to the ..... t n gondavarman thirumalpad v union of india and ors 2002 7 supreme 620 21 apart from the said decisions the ..... and national parks the protection afforded to wild life needed to be improved the wild birds and animals protection act 1912 8 of 1912 had become .....

ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)333; 2(1997)CLT273; 67(1997)DLT145; 1997(42)DRJ131

on the expert advice given by the national board of wild life i am particularly happy that plants have been included financial benefits which accrue from poaching and trade in wild life produce further such laws mainly relate to control of hunting that though they are not covered by the wild life protection act 1972 and the amendment act no 44 of 1991 laid in the writ petitions to the constitutionality of the amendments effected in the principal act by the wild life protection schedule ii schedule iii and schedule iv of the principal act besides it also made the following changes 1 it substituted and animals protection act 1912 act no viii of 1912 section 3 of that act empowered the provincial government to declare it brought about changes in sections 1 2 4 6 8 12 18 19 24 33 34 35 36 38 39

Indian Handicrafts Emporium and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3240; 2003(5)ALD39(SC); 106(2003)DLT350(SC); JT2003(7)SC446; 2003(6)SCALE831; (2003)7SCC589

..... taken or purported to be taken for violation of section 40 of this act at any time before the commencement of the wild life protection amendment act 2002 shall not be proceeded with all pending proceedings shall ..... ors 1960crilj671 8 mr sanghi would further submit that the ivory which has legally been imported by the appellants herein prior to coming into force of the 1991 amendment act having not .....

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

..... wild life protection amendment bill 2002 proproses i to highlight the ecological and environmental objective in the long title of the wild life act ii to add new definitions in view of the amendments proposed in the wild life act ..... 8 the petitioner contended that the legislature had a specific intention in creating two separate entries in the form of animal article under section 2 2 of the act .....

Consumer Education and Research Society, Ahmedabad and Etc. Vs. Union ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1995Guj133; (1995)2GLR1655

the effect of cancelling the earlier notification under which a wild life sanctuary had been established under the wild life protection 3 of section 66 to be declared as a wild life sanctuary section 18 provided for declaration of a sanctuary and section 2 26 the restriction contained in the wild life protection act 1972 will apply to deemed sanctuaries under section 66 incorporated into the act what is the effect of this amendment the rule in this behalf as observed by vivian bose locus standi to file the present writ petitions and the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned notification is not or readily intelligible boundaries the effect of the declaration under section 18 was that the sanctuary came into existence the moment first necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of law 8 the wild life protection act 1972 was enacted with the