Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection amendment act 2002 section 10 substitution of heading of chapter iv Page 4 of about 354 results (0.141 seconds)

M.P. All India Tourist Permit Owners Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT15

..... government.'section 50 of the wild life protection act provides for prevention and detection of the offences. the powers of entry, search, arrest and detention in section 50, sub-section (1), clauses (a), (b) and (c) deals with the said aspects. sub-section (2) of section 50 was omitted by amendment act no. 44/91 which ..... 51(2) as there is no power of confiscation given to any officer or authority such as assistant director of wild life preservation or wild life warden, etc. to pass an order of forfeiture. the scheme of wild life protection act is totally different hence it was held by this court that merely on seizure property would not vest in ..... has to be adjudication for confiscation, which is provided, by an order of magistrate as apparent, from the conjoint reading of sections 39, 50 and 51 of wild life protection act. thus, the case of madhukar rao (supra) is totally distinguishable. it is true that merely by seizure property cannot stand automatically forfeited to state government. .....

Mangaleswari Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,

Court : Chennai

..... petition in connection with ground case in cr.no.96/13, u/s.5(a) of explosive substances act, 1908 and 9, 39[1(a)]., 50, 51 wild life act, 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002 of thiruppalaikudi police station as per cr.m.p.no.1879/13 in the court of session judge, ramanathapuram and it is dismissed on 29.07.13 ..... /10, u/s.schedule 1 part iv - c wild life (protection) act 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002, section 9, 39(1)a, d(3)50, 51 of mandapam wild life range as per crl.o.p.no.11374/10 in the madurai bench of madras high court and the anticipatory bails were ..... bail petitions in the advers.cases in cr.no.6/2009 and 7/2009, u/s schedule 1 part iv-c wild life (protection) act 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act 2002, section 9, 39(1) a, d(3) 50, 51 of ramanathapuram wild life range, as per cr.m.p.no.1707/09 and 1708/09 respectively in sessions court, ramanathapuram and cr.no.37 .....

Fr.Sebastian Fernancies Vs. the District Forest Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... way of the present writ petition.9. it was pointed out that section 54 of the act stood amended by virtue of the wild life (protection) amendment act 2003, act 16 of 2003 w.e.f. 01.04.2003, in the said amendment under sub-section 4 of section 54, clause (b) of sub-section 1, as was originally found ..... past cases. in any event, the conduct of the petitioner shows that he voluntarily accepted to compound the offence in order to escape from the prosecution under the wild life (protection) act. therefore, the petitioner is estopped from contending that the compounding fee, which was paid by him ought to be refunded. therefore, the second contention raised ..... one dead female deer with bullet injury and waste material of another deer following removal of meat. since, the action of the petitioner was an offence under the wild life (protection) act, he was arrested along with his accomplices, c.k.balan, krishnan and muniappan and they were produced before the first respondent for investigation. it is .....

Shaukat Ali Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... 29.6.2012 being case crime no. 422 of 2012 u/s 279, 429, 289, 290 ipc read with section 7 criminal law amendment act and section 16c, 43(2), 48-a and 51 of wild life protection act, 1972, p.s. sector-39 noida district gautam budh nagar be quashed and a writ, order or direction in the nature ..... deer or the horn of a rhinoceros, except with the previous permission in writing of the chief wild life warden or the authorised officer. 2(a) no person other than a person having a certificate of ownership, shall, after the commencement of the wile life (protection) amendment act, 2002 acquire, receive, keep in his control, custody or possession any captive animal, animal ..... report fir was lodged for the offences punishable u/s 16c, 43(2), 48a, 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (which shall be referred to as the 'act' hereinafter), sections 279, 429, 289 and 290 ipc and section 7 criminal law amendment act in p.s. sector-39, noida district gautam bud nagar against the petitioner, his mahavat .....

V.K. Venkitachalam Vs. State of Kerala, Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Kerala

..... the horn of a rhinoceros, except with the previous permission in writing of the chief wild life warden or the authorised officer. (2a) no person other than a person having a certificate of ownership, shall, after the commencement of the wild life (protection)amendment act, 2002 acquire, receive, keep in his control, custody or possession any captive ..... process of taxidermy an uncured trophy of such animal, except with the previous permission in writing of the wild life warden or the authorised officer. section 43 of the act as it exists now, after amendment as per the amendment 16/2003 reads as follows : 43. regulation of transfer of animal etc.- (1) no person ..... nakeri vasudevan namboodiri and others versus union of india,reported in 2007 (4) khc 140requires reconsideration, with reference to the mandate of the wildlife (protection) act, 1972, [as amended in the year 2003 by act 16 of 2003] [hereinafter referred to as the act] governing the transfer of captive animals, particularly captive .....

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

..... passed the order in exercise of power provided under section 61-b(2) of the indian forest act, 1927 (as amended vide the indian forest (uttar pradesh amendment) act, 2000) as well as under section 34-a of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (as amended in 2002 & 2006). 3. the land in question is situated near dudhwa national park. the place is named as gauri ..... phanta. 4. the petitioners claim protection under the scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 (in short 'forest rights act, 2006'), which .....

Samir Mathur Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003AP321; 2003(2)ALD858; 2003(3)ALT47

..... provide to make declaration in form no. 2 after coming into force of the rules. be it also noticed under various provisions of chapter-v(a) which is introduced by wild life (protection) (amendment) act, 1986 trade or commerce in trophies, animals, articles etc., derived from certain animals is prohibited and under section 50 of the act, they are offences.4. rule 35 of ..... declared by a person arises for consideration in this writ petition.2. the petitioner herein filed a declaration as required under section 40 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short, the act), and rule 34 of wild life (protection) (andhra pradesh) rules, 1974 (for short, the rules) on 23.8.1993. in covering letter accompanying declaration it is stated that his father late r .....

Vishalakshi Amma Vs. The State Of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , provides that any action taken or purported to be taken for violation of section 40 of the act, 1972 at any time before the commencement of the wild life (protection) amendment act, 2002 shall not be proceeded with and all pending proceedings shall stand abated. 2.2 in exercise of the powers conferred under section 40a read with section ..... writ petitioner has preferred the present appeal.2. the facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under: 2.1 under section 40 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act, 1972), every person having at the commencement of this act the control, custody or possession of any captive ..... in sub sections (2) and (4) of section 40 of the act, 1972, the central government may, by notification, require any person to declare to the chief wild life warden or the authorised officer, any captive animal, animal article, etc., in his control, custody or possession, in respect of which no declaration had been made under sub .....

Rekhchand Son of Ayodhya Dehariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT464

..... transfer;(iii) in relation to ivory imported into india or an article made from such ivory, the date of expiry of six months from the commencement of the wild life (protection) (amendment act, 1991. 7. on perusal of the evidence on record, it is apparent that none of 3 the witness including the investigating officer k.p. dhurve ( ..... article or trophy made therefrom and snake venom or its derivative];(c) specified date' means-(i) in relation to a scheduled animal on the commencement of the wild life (protection) (amendment) act, 1986, the date of expiry of two months from such commencement;(ii) in relation to any animal added or transferred to schedule i or part ii ..... 1997, passed by judicial magistrate first class, amarwada in criminal case no. 457/1995, convicting the applicant under section 9 and 49a read with section 51 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of rs. 5000/-.2. according to prosecution, on 29.1.1995, k.p. .....

Swetab Kumar Vs. Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Climate Change

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the notification dated 11.06.2020 does not preclude 1 the competent authority from taking steps under chapter vb of the wild life (protection) act,1972 by means of amendment brought in the act by wild life (protection) amendment act, 2022 and it shall be open for the competent authority to prosecute the said declarants and also take consequential steps ..... of the inventory declared under the said advisory.2. in order to bring clarity it may be necessary to narrate a few background facts:- before the wild life (protection) amendment act, 2022 was enforced, ministry of environment, forests and climate change issued a notification dated 11.06.2020 which was in the form of an ..... immune from prosecution, the same would obviously mean that declarants are immune from prosecution or action under any future laws and amendments incorporated in the wild life(protection) act, 1972.18. in the end, we strongly recommend that before the respondent frames and publishes rules under section 49m(9) of the .....