Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection amendment act 2002 section 10 substitution of heading of chapter iv Court: chennai Page 1 of about 9 results (1.079 seconds)

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to Gov ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(1)CTC513

..... should be compensated for the loss sustained by it on account of various notifications issued by the collector under the wild life (protection)act, 1972. 13. it is therefore necessary to notice the relevant provisions contained in such act and also the subsequent amendments:18. declaration of sanctuary.- (1) the state government may, by notification, declare any area to be a sanctuary if it ..... is of adequate ecological, faunal, floral, geomorphological, natural or zoological significance, for the purpose of protecting, propagating or developing wild life or its environment.the provisions contained in section 18(1) have been amended vide section 15 of act 44 of 1991 with effect from 2.10.1991. the amended provisions of section 18(1) read as follows:18. declaration of sanctuary.- (1) the state .....

Mangaleswari Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,

Court : Chennai

..... petition in connection with ground case in cr.no.96/13, u/s.5(a) of explosive substances act, 1908 and 9, 39[1(a)]., 50, 51 wild life act, 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002 of thiruppalaikudi police station as per cr.m.p.no.1879/13 in the court of session judge, ramanathapuram and it is dismissed on 29.07.13 ..... /10, u/s.schedule 1 part iv - c wild life (protection) act 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002, section 9, 39(1)a, d(3)50, 51 of mandapam wild life range as per crl.o.p.no.11374/10 in the madurai bench of madras high court and the anticipatory bails were ..... bail petitions in the advers.cases in cr.no.6/2009 and 7/2009, u/s schedule 1 part iv-c wild life (protection) act 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act 2002, section 9, 39(1) a, d(3) 50, 51 of ramanathapuram wild life range, as per cr.m.p.no.1707/09 and 1708/09 respectively in sessions court, ramanathapuram and cr.no.37 .....

Fr.Sebastian Fernancies Vs. the District Forest Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... way of the present writ petition.9. it was pointed out that section 54 of the act stood amended by virtue of the wild life (protection) amendment act 2003, act 16 of 2003 w.e.f. 01.04.2003, in the said amendment under sub-section 4 of section 54, clause (b) of sub-section 1, as was originally found ..... past cases. in any event, the conduct of the petitioner shows that he voluntarily accepted to compound the offence in order to escape from the prosecution under the wild life (protection) act. therefore, the petitioner is estopped from contending that the compounding fee, which was paid by him ought to be refunded. therefore, the second contention raised ..... one dead female deer with bullet injury and waste material of another deer following removal of meat. since, the action of the petitioner was an offence under the wild life (protection) act, he was arrested along with his accomplices, c.k.balan, krishnan and muniappan and they were produced before the first respondent for investigation. it is .....

Consumer Action Group Represented by Its Trustee Vs. the Union of Indi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)1MLJ481

..... any of the notifications under the wild life protection act or the forest conservation act, 1980.15. while paying homage and deliberating on the centenary celebration of dr. ambedkar, it is but proper that we begin with a reference to the constitution of india. though a later introduction by the constitution 42nd amendment, 1976. article 48-a is ..... survey of india with copy rights reserved in favour of the government of india, prepared in the year 1970 shows that the entire area notified under the wild life (protection act as the area closed to hunting, is nothing but the adyar river estuary. in fact the backwaters from the mouth of adyar river is supposed ..... fundamental duties introduced by the same amendment act is also worth looking into. article 51-a is as follows:51-a. it shall be the duty of every citizen of india-(a) ....(b) ....(c) ....(d) ....(c) ....(e) ....(f) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for .....

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Forest an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2005Mad304

..... the first respondent, union of india, represented by its secretary, ministry of environment and forests, new delhi. by that notification, the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') has been amended by including various species to the schedule. the species with which we are concerned are as follows: -' part iv a - coelenterates1. ..... the impugned notification dated 11.07.2001. in our opinion, the interpretation which we are taking will be in consonance with the aims and objects of the wild life protection act. as already stated above, heydon's rule of interpretation (the mischief rule) has to be applied in this case, and we have to see ..... and the reason why the said act had to be made. obviously, the purpose of introducing the wild life (protection) act was that the wild life in india was being destroyed by industrialization, poaching, etc. and it had to be protected so as to preserve the ecological balance. keeping this primary object of the act, we cannot say .....

Ahamed Khan Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep by Its

Court : Chennai

..... in connection with ground case in cr.no.96/13, u/s.5(a) of explosive substances act 1908 and 9, 39[1(a)].50, 51 of wild life act 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002 of thiruppalaikudi police station as per cr.m.p.no.1898/13 in the court of session judge, ramanathapuram and it is dismissed on 29.07 ..... police, thiruppalaikudi police station, in crime no.96 of 2013 under section 5(a) of explosive substances act, 1908 and 9, 39 [(1)(a)]., 50, 51 of wild life act, 1972 amendment wild life (protection) act, 2002. aggrieved by the order of detention, the present petition has been filed. 4.though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has raised several grounds to ..... came to advers.notice in the following case:- s.no.police station and crime sections of law no.01. ramanathapuram police schedule 1 part ivc wild station, life (protection) act wlor no.4/2010 1972 amendment act 2009 sec.9, 39(1)(a).d(3).50, 51. 3.the ground case alleged against the detenu is one registered by the .....

M. Veerateswaran Vs. the Deputy Collector Cum Sub-divisional Executive ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(2)CTC449; (2003)2MLJ578

..... derogatory to the dignity of women; (f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture; (g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures; (h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; ..... guide to the detailed construction of section 10 of the constitution of the state of st. christopher nevis and anguilla, because the first and fourteenth amendments have no provision corresponding to section 10(2). the american judges look for the inherent limitations which there must be in the fundamental freedoms of ..... that the relevant section was unconstitutional as it established a previous restraint on the right of free speech in violation of the first amendment which was protected by the fourteenth amendment against state action.'loud-speakers are today indispensable instruments of effective public speech. the sound truck has become an accepted method of .....

Kollidam Aaru Pathukappu Nala Sangam Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep.by ...

Court : Chennai

..... activity specified in category b will be treated as category a, if located in whole or in part within 10 kms from the boundary of (i) protected areas notified under the wild life (protection) act, 1972; (ii) critically polluted areas as notified by the central pollution control board from time to time; (iii) notified eco-sensitive areas; ..... . what led to a reference to the nine judges bench was the question as to whether the protection afforded by article 31b of the constitution, was available to the laws added to the 9th schedule by way of amendments issued after 24.4.1973, the date on which, the decision in kesavananda bharati vs. state ..... the constitutional court itself, the question assumed greater significance.17. part xiv-a with the heading ".tribunals". was inserted in the constitution, under the constitution (42nd amendment) act, 1976. this part comprises of two articles namely 323a and 323b. while article 323a empowered the parliament to create administrative tribunals, by law, for .....

Ram Raj Tobacco Trading Co., by Its Partner, D.K. Narayanan and ors. V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1957Mad325; [1957]8STC127(Mad)

..... quashed. this defect was remedied by an express provision in the enactment in the form of section 3 (1-a) which we have extracted above. in view of the amendment thus effected, an attack grounded that the rules are inconsistent with the act has been eliminated.22. so far as the rules themselves are concerned, there is neither ambiguity ..... the act of 1955 however altered this definition in the act of 1953 by omitting the words cigars, cheroots, cigarettes, cigarette tobacco and pipe tobacco so that as amended taxed tobacco meant manufactured tobacco liable to tax under the act and purchases and sales in regard to these alone were exempt from sales-tax under act ik of ..... refer to as the impugned act -- is the subject of challenge in these writ petitions.2. section 2 of the impugned act whose validity is challenged in these proceedings amended section 5 of the madras general sales tax act, 1939.3. the general scheme of taxation provided by the madras general sales tax act is the imposition of a .....

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

..... .32. the next point for consideration is whether under the impugned provision equal protection is denied. the last clause of the 14th amendment of the american constitution in which a similar limitation occurs states :'nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any ..... , in a passage which has since become classic. he observed :'the fourteenth amendment in declaring that no state 'shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws', undoubtedly intended, not only that there should be no arbitrary ..... law in the sense that it makes a required minimum of protection for every one's right of life, liberty & property which the congress or the legislature may not withhold (sic). the learned chief justice then observes :'but the framers & adopters of this amendment were not content to depend on a mere minimum secured .....