Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 9 prohibition of hunting Page 92 of about 7,850 results (0.258 seconds)

May 19 1980 (FN)

Andrus Vs. Utah

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be placed under national forest administration, if, in his opinion, the land be best adapted thereto; and" "whereas, said act provides for the use of public land for the conservation or propagation of wild life; and" "whereas, i find and declare that it is necessary to classify all of the vacant, unreserved and unappropriated ..... by the original numbered grants. [ footnote 2/10 ] congress also found that a rule which kept the states from replacing nonmineral land with mineral land "amply protected" the federal interest in preventing a windfall to the states. congress therefore declined to depart from the fundamental equal acreage principle accepted since 1802. h.r.rep ..... stat. 1272. [ footnote 18 ] the bill originally introduced by congressman taylor in 1934 (h.r. 6462, 73d cong., 2d sess.) purported to authorize the protection of 173 million acres of public range lands by including them within grazing districts. as enacted, however, the statute covered a maximum of 80 million acres. this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2007 (HC)

Arunachal Pradesh Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... forest resources of the territory and cultivation as well as processing of agricultural, plantation and horticultural crops, medicinal and aromatic plants.7. to protect, maintain and improve wild life and other natural resources, including the environmental factors.10 it may be mentioned that the said memorandum was subsequently amended and the following was ..... [1997]225itr235(sc) , where the question came for consideration of the apex court was regarding interpretation of the provisions of section 2(15) of the act regarding exemption on 'charitable purpose' and it was held that there must be an obligation created to spend the money exclusively and essentially on charity. the ..... , the company filed its return of income wherein, the company claimed exemption under clause (26b) of section 10 of the income-tax act, (for short 'the act'). the claim was rejected by the assessing authority whereupon appeal was filed before the appellate authority and thereafter also before the appellate tribunal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2013 (HC)

icici Lombard General Vs. Annakkili

Court : Chennai

..... wild guesses and arbitrariness, and non-arbitrariness. if it is not so, it cannot be just." (iv) in nizam institute of medical sciences v. prasanth s.dhananka reported in (2009) 6 scc 1 = 2010 acj 3.(sc), the supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act ..... awarded should not be inadequate and should neither be unreasonable, excessive, nor deficient. there can be no exact uniform rule for measuring the value of human life and the measure of damage cannot be arrived at by precise mathematical calculation; but amount recoverable depends on broad facts and circumstances of each case. it ..... has questioned the quantum of compensation, notwithstanding the diminution in the value of the money, escalation in the price, contending inter alia that it is disproportionate. life is immeasurable and it is not a commodity. r.k.malik's case was decided in the year 2009. now the cost of living has increased. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2016 (HC)

The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Ltd., Nagapattinam Vs. ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... (sc), the hon'ble supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act, 1986. while enhancing the compensation awarded by the national consumer disputes redressal commission from rs.15 lakhs to rs.1 crore, the hon'ble bench made the ..... just", a wide discretion is vested in the tribunal, the determination has to be rational, to be done by a judicious approach and not the outcome of whims, wild guesses and arbitrariness, and non-arbitrariness. if it is not so, it cannot be just." (iv) in nizam institute of medical sciences v. prasanth s.dhananka ..... compensation awarded should not be inadequate and should neither be unreasonable, excessive, nor deficient. there can be no exact uniform rule for measuring the value of human life and the measure of damage cannot be arrived at by precise mathematical calculation; but amount recoverable depends on broad facts and circumstances of each case. it should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2013 (HC)

Kennel Club of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... 4, 9(l) and 11(1)(a) and (l) of the act. he also referred to article 51(a)(g) of the constitution of india in respect of the fundamental duties of every citizen in protecting and improving the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures. he placed reliance on the ..... rescue homes, animal shelters, sanctuaries and the like where animals and birds may find a shelter when they have become old and useless or when they need protection; (h)to co-operate with, and co-ordinate the work of, associations or bodies established for the purpose of preventing unnecessary pain or suffering to animals or ..... for the protection of animals and birds; (i)to give financial and other assistance to animal welfare organisations functioning in any local area or to encourage the formation of animal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2013 (HC)

JayakrishnA.V. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... . state of kerala,reprsented by the principal secretary to government, forest and wild life department, government secretariat,thiruvananthapuram-695 001.2. the additional principal chief conservator of forests (administration), forest headquarters, vazhuthacaud,thiruvananthapuram-695 014 3. joseph thomas,deputy conservator of forest, office of the additional principal chief conservator of forests (protection) forest headquarters, vazhuthacaud, thiruvananthapuram-695 014. r1 & r2 by sr government ..... delay to challenge the decision in the earlier round, the fact of the matter remains that the tribunal cannot be criticized of having failed to act in terms of the provisions of the administrative tribunals act when it said that the parties stand bound by the inter partes judgment rendered by the full bench and the division bench of this court, as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2015 (HC)

The Managing Director, Vs. 1)clara Jeyamani

Court : Chennai

..... , at the time of filing of the claim petition. she has to bear the responsibility of bringing up the minor daughters, provide them proper education, care and protection and perform marriages. 'consortium', as per best v. samuel fox reported in (1952) ac716 means, "duty owned by a wife to her husband and vice ..... wild guesses and arbitrariness, and non-arbitrariness. if it is not so, it cannot be just."(iv) in nizam institute of medical sciences v. prasanth s.dhananka reported in (2009) 6 scc1= 2010 acj38(sc), the supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act ..... awarded should not be inadequate and should neither be unreasonable, excessive, nor deficient. there can be no exact uniform rule for measuring the value of human life and the measure of damage cannot be arrived at by precise mathematical calculation; but amount recoverable depends on broad facts and circumstances of each case. it should .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2009 (HC)

Joseph Kurian and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(2)KLJ270

..... for extension of the lease, that was sought for by the petitioner. the said proceedings, addressed to the principal secretary, government of kerala, forests and wild life department, is ext.p7. ext.p7 contains a further direction not to forward proposals catering to the individuals' interests for approval under section 2 of the ..... way of a fresh lease or by way of renewal of the earlier lease. it is trite that, in the absence of any right that enjoys the protection of law, the petitioner cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution.8. further, the issue in the present case is essentially ..... grave import concerning protection of forests, arise for determination in the above writ petition. the petitioner has approached this court seeking the issue of a writ of certiorari, quashing ext.p6 proceedings of the fifth respondent and -ext.p7 letter of the third-respondent, as violative of the provisions of the forest (conservation) act, 1980, hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 1999 (HC)

Indian Vegetarian Congress and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1999Cal212

..... 10-97, 7-2-98 were all directed to discourage the establishment of slaughtering house and to reconsider the proposal therefor highlighting the necessity for preservation of wild life and prevention of diminishing cattle resources. nowhere in the aforesaid correspondences the authority or power of the state in dealing with the surplus land has been rated ..... government becomes the absolute owner of the property free from all encumbrances and it can deal with as any other owner and such dealing is protected under article 298 of the constitution of india. according to him the govt. can grant lease its land and by reason of section 3 of the ..... the alleged agreement between fregerio conserve allana limited and land revenue department, howrah. govt. of west bengal violating all norms of environmental pollution, provision w.b. act. xxii of 1950 and acquisition proceedings of the lands in question and other relevant statutes and to certify them and on being so certified to quash the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2014 (HC)

Essel Infraprojects Limited Vs. Devendra Prakash Mishra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... the plaintiffs that the allegation of the residents was that the land allotment to the plaintiffs company in different areas of madhya pradesh was major threat to wild life and water resources of country and those who were raising voice against the plaintiffs regarding their upcoming projects, were being threatened by the officials of zee ..... of land allotment and also to create a public opinion for adoption of a fair and transparent process in allotment of land by the government and was protected by qualified privilege. defendant no. 3 summarized the main features of the programme telecasted in the said paragraph. it is also the case of the defendant ..... tv channel and would submit that the focus tv news channel has violated the established norms and also various provisions of the cable televisions network regulations act 1995 as prescribed by the ministry of information and broadcasting, government of india as a part of broadcast permission granted to the channel under uplinking/downlinking .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //