Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 9 prohibition of hunting Page 100 of about 7,850 results (0.340 seconds)

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Date of Decision: 19.7.2013. Vs. State of Punjab and Others --responde ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.15343 of 2013 -3- in cases of miscarriages and abortion including abortion induced under the medical termination of pregnancy act, 1971, subject to the conditions that the leave does not exceed six weeks and the application for leave is supported by a certificate from a registered medical practitioner and in ..... , if required, can be sanctioned leave of kind due, on the production of a medical certificate. (2) in the case of a person to whom the employee's state insurance act, 1948 (34 of 1948) applies, the amount of leave salary payable under this rule shall be reduced by the amount of benefit payable under the said ..... act for the corresponding period. a bare reading of the rule would make it clear that the competent authority may provide to a female govt. employee maternity leave on full pay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

R.P.C Paper Mills Private Limited Vs. the Superintendant of Police

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Jaleel Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Sibi K.S Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Jasim Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Magician Rajesh @ Rajesh Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Sujatha Vs. D.K.Goel

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2013 (HC)

Annamma Varghese Vs. S.i.of Police, Aluva Police Station

Court : Kerala

..... said submission, there is any threat from the side of respondents 5 to 10 or anybody claiming under them, respondents 1 to 4 shall provide adequate police protection to the life and properties of the employees, labourers and other functionaries of the petitioner's factory from any threat by respondents 5 to 10 and persons claiming under them ..... the correctness of those submissions cannot be considered by us in a petition for police protection. those questions have to be considered by the authorities under the industrial disputes act. the same is beyond the scope of a petition for police protection.5. we have no doubt that the unions and workmen have a right to agitate ..... respondents 5 to 10 have started agitation in respect of their demands. the matter has been referred to the 11th respondent under section 12 of the industrial disputes act. the petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging that in the name of strike, respondents 5 to 10 and their men are obstructing the functioning of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2013 (SC)

inderjeet Arya and anr Vs. Icici Bank Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... bank in the nature of proceedings and not a suit , protection under section 22(1) would not be available, especially, when the appellants are guarantors.7. this court, in ksl and industries limited (supra) took the view that even ..... rightly pointed out by the high court, the same stands covered by various judgments of this court referred to earlier. appellants, who are the guarantors, can obtain the protection of section 22(1) of sica only if the action filed by the bank comes within the ambit of the term suit . if the action filed by the respondent ..... in this case, concerned with the question whether the appellants who are directors and guarantors of a sick company and are entitled to get the protection of section 22(1) of the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 (for short the sica).3. m/s rajat pharmachem pvt. ltd. (rpl) was engaged in the business of manufacturing, trading .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2013 (HC)

Kunhi Mohammed Vs. A.P.Sajitha and Another

Court : Kerala

..... is that, the first respondent is the divorced wife of the petitioner and she filed a petition under section 3(1) of the muslim women's (protection of rights on divorce) act, claiming an amount of 12,000/- towards maintenance during the period of iddat and 7,20,000/- towards fair and reasonable provision. the petitioner appeared and ..... women is governed by the act and not by the personal law (shariat) and in case of a dispute between the two, the former ..... all the trauma attendant on a second marriage, - quality of life which a remarried woman can aspire to lead vis-avis her first marriage, vi) actual date of remarriage may not be a relevant input. vii) after the enactment of muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) act, the question with regard to marriage and maintenance of a muslim .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //