Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 1,253 results (0.883 seconds)

Jan 13 2015 (HC)

K. Ramachandra Hebbar and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka, Reptd By Its ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the r4 to consider the appeal filed by the petitioners dated 17.3.14, for enhancement of compensation in respect of acquisition of their lands under wild life protection act, 1972 by setting aside the endosement dt.19/21.5.14, issued by the r4, as per annexure-a etc.) 1. petitioners have assailed ..... commissioner, chickmagaluru district, chickmagaiuru. 2. the grievance of the petitioners is that their applications filed under section 18 of the land acquisition act read with 25(1) (d) of the wild life protection act, 1972 before the assistant commissioner- fourth respondent herein have not been considered. 3. learned counsel for the petitioners states that the applications ..... reserved liberty to the petitioners to seek enhancement of compensation by making an application under section 18 of the land acquisition act, 1894 read with section 25(1)(d) of the wild life protection act,1972. that liberty is to seek enhancement of compensation by making a reference to the civil court, but petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1991 (HC)

Yeshvir Goyal and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1993]199ITR119(KAR); [1993]199ITR119(Karn); 1991(3)KarLJ18

..... act and the magistrate took cognizance of the offence under the wild life protection act and ordered issue of the process to the accused, it could not be said that the allegations in the complaint, taken on their face ..... forest and removed the ivory tusks of the elephant and it was mentioned in the complaint that elephant was included in the schedule i of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, and that the complaint was authorised by the bihar government's notification no. s. o. 1022/418/73 to file complaints under the ..... value, would not amount in law to any offence against the 'act'. therefore, the quashing of the proceedings of the magistrate, on the facts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2021 (HC)

Uttara Kannada District Fishermen Association Forum Vs. State Of Karna ...

Court : Karnataka

..... b will be treated as category-a, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the boundary of: (i) protected areas notified under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, (ii) critically polluted areas as notified by the central pollution control board from time to time, (iii) notified eco ..... -sensitive areas, (iv) inter-state boundaries and international boundaries. (underline supplied) 66. a submission made was that though the notified eco sensitive areas are not defined either in the environment (protection) act, 1986 (for short the said act ..... government of india, in exercise of its powers under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the environment - 6 - (protection) act, 1986 (for short the said act of 1986 ). on 23rd january 2019, the seiaa accorded environmental clearance for the proposed 2nd stage development of commercial karwar port (for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2021 (HC)

Baithkol Bandharu Nirashrithara Yantrikrut Dhoni Meenugarara Sahakara ...

Court : Karnataka

..... b will be treated as category-a, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the boundary of: (i) protected areas notified under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, (ii) critically polluted areas as notified by the central pollution control board from time to time, (iii) notified eco ..... -sensitive areas, (iv) inter-state boundaries and international boundaries. (underline supplied) 66. a submission made was that though the notified eco sensitive areas are not defined either in the environment (protection) act, 1986 (for short the said act ..... government of india, in exercise of its powers under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the environment - 6 - (protection) act, 1986 (for short the said act of 1986 ). on 23rd january 2019, the seiaa accorded environmental clearance for the proposed 2nd stage development of commercial karwar port (for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2018 (HC)

Sri. Thomas Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... under sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 353, 307 read with section 149 of ipc and sections 2, 9, 31, 51, 52 of wild life protection act and sections 3 & 27 of arms act. procedures regarding investigation, drawing mahazar, spot mahazar and formalities were conducted.6. the learned sessions judge by his judgment, convicted the appellant accused no. ..... infact, except two other fleeing. one out of them (accused no.1) thangachan, snatching the rifle 9 from one of the officials. thangacchan attempting on the life of the complainant by firing forcefully and preventing the complainant and the other officials from discharging the official duties.13. the statement of complainant in this case was ..... of doubt. thus from the oral evidence and the attendant circumstances, pw2 to 10 being eye witnesses and aggrieved persons as most of them faced threat to life in the hands of the accused at kannegala, on 01.10.2006 is established beyond reasonable doubt. thus, i find ingredients of both sections are proved .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2017 (HC)

Imran Khan Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of forest department, devanahalli range, devanahalli, bengaluru rural district, for the offence punishable under sections9 11, 39, 48-a, 49-b, 49-c & 51 of wild life protection act1972and etc. this petition coming on for orders, this day, the court passed the following: order on ia no.1/2016 this application is filed under section 439 ..... department, devanahalli range, devanahalli, bengaluru rural district for the offences punishable under sections 9, 11, 39, 48-a, 49-b, 49-c and 51 of wildlife protection act, 1972, has imposed certain conditions, particularly, condition no.3 which is enumerated below. 3 (3) petitioners shall mark their attendance once in a month on the second ..... the courts from altering or correcting its own judgment or order except for correcting the typographical error. when specific provision prohibits the court from doing certain acts, it cannot be circumvented by the aid of any other provision under cr.pc or by interpreting the provision in any other manner, as the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1989 (HC)

Nanjanayaka and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1990Kant97; 1989(2)KarLJ202

..... or circumstances and there is no statutory obligation on these authorities to grant lease in contravention of rules relating to mines act and other mandatory provisions contemplated under the explosives act; law relating to environment and ecology, pollution control act, forest preservation act, wild life protection act, which impose serious restrictions.referring to the facts of each case, respondents deny or do not admit they are the pattadars ..... and in some cases, referring to grant made by the government under land grant rules and conferment of occupancy right under the provisions of the land reforms act contend such orders/grants do .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2004 (HC)

S. Murari and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka, by Range Forest Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2272; ILR2004KAR1706; 2004(6)KarLJ115

..... had permitted the range forest officer to investigate the case against the accused for offences under section 24 of the karnataka forest act, 1963, section 35(6) of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and section 2 of the forest conservation act, 1980.4. criminal petition no. 2854/2002, 2855/2002 and 2859/2002 are filed for setting aside the order in ..... -else. the learned counsel also contends that, the range forest officer cannot be treated as police officer within the meaning of section 2(16) of the karnataka police act. hence, the learned counsel prays for allowing the petitions.7. on the contrary, the learned hcgp strongly contended that the material on record clearly shows that the orders ..... of section 155 of cr.p.c. such being the case, the state, in this regard, cannot take shelter under section 62-a of the karnataka forest act to wriggle out of the situation.14. the discussion supra and the settled law in this regard make it clear that the orders impugned are illegal and improper.15 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2016 (HC)

Sri B v Srikumar Vs. The Chief Conservator of Forest Aranya Bhavan

Court : Karnataka

..... easement or license . there is an absolute prohibition on the grant of such rights under section 20 r/w. section 35(3) of wild life (protection) act, 1972. as such the plaintiff has no right to seek easementory right in the forest land invoking the provisions of section 13 of the indian easement ..... must be understood according to its 12 dictionary meaning. this description covers all statutorily recognized forests, whether designated as reserved, protected or otherwise for the purpose of section 2(i) of the forest conservation act. the term forest land occurring in section 2 will not only include forest as understood in the dictionary sense, but ..... and are, therefore, not permissible without prior approval of the central government. accordingly, any such activity is prima facie violation of the provisions of the forest conservation act, 1980. every state government must promptly ensure total cessation of all such activities forthwith . the hon ble supreme court in the said case also held as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 2024 (HC)

Centre For Wildlife Studies (r) Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... has been no violation and no specific instance of non-intimation has been alleged. 11 (ii) petitioner was running 2 years masters degree program in wild life protection and conservation in collaboration with national centre for biological sciences, which is affiliated to the department of atomic energy, government of india. expenses such as ..... this court calling in question an order dated 05-03-2021 by which the 2nd respondent suspends its registration under the foreign contribution (regulation) act, 2010 ( the act for short) and sought a consequential relief against the orders passed aftermath of the aforesaid order and has further sought a direction by issuance of ..... to the utilization accounts or there have been amount first spent and thereafter, replenishment to the utilization accounts etc. and there was no violation of the act or the rules, details of which are at pages 549 to 551. (iv) petitioner executes projects for domestic organizations including government departments and many a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //