Water Works - Judgment Search Results

Kali Aerated Water Works Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2000]242ITR79(Mad)

Madras branch of that firm then known as Kali Aerated Water Works was taken over by Sakthivel and Singaravel who were branch of that firm then known as Kali Aerated Water Works was taken over by Sakthivel and Singaravel who were partners

Helena Water Works Co. Vs. Helena

Court: US Supreme Court

Co. v. Hamilton, 146 U. S. 258 ; Long Island Water Supply Co. v. Brooklyn, 166 U. S. 685 , and v. Steele, 20 Mont. 1. The privilege of building other works was, in the absence of some binding contract forbidding the

Water Works Karmachari Sangh Vs. Public Health and Engineering Departm ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1966MP49; [1965(11)FLR181]; (1966)ILLJ366MP

workers of the Water-works Ujjain through the President of the Water-works Karmachari Sangh.2. The petition is directed against the Public Health petition under Article 227 of the Constitution submitted by the workers of the Water-works Ujjain through the President of the Water-works

Tampa Water Works Co. Vs. Tampa

Court: US Supreme Court

City of Tampa by which the former was to erect waterworks and to Page 199 U. S. 242 have the right - 199 U.S. 241 (1905) U.S. Supreme Court Tampa Water Works Co. v. Tampa, 199 U.S. 241 (1905) Tampa Water Works

Water Works and 4 ors. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corp.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1988WLN(UC)155

health of inhabitants from the insufficiency or unwhole-some ness. Then water has to be pumped. Therefore, the treatment of water as the authority under the Act has held that the Water Works Department is fully covered by the provisions of the Act,

Kali Aerated Water Works, Tiruchirapalli Vs. Rashid and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1989Mad9

use the trade i mark or trade name for aerated water business. Their further case was that a comparison of the other partners of the erstwhile firm of Kali Aerated Water Works or the use of the same by Rockfort Soft Beverages

Madera Water Works Vs. Madera

Court: US Supreme Court

Madera Water Works v. Madera, 228 U.S. 454 (1913) Madera Water Works v. Madera No. 229 Argued April 17, 18, 1913 S. 150 , 191 U. S. 156 ; Helena Water Works Co. v. Helena, 195 U. S. 383 , 195 U.

Bluefield Water Works Vs. Public Service Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

commission, taking $400,000 (round figures), added $25,000 for Bluefield Valley waterworks plant in Virginia, 10 percent for going value, and $10,000 - 262 U.S. 679 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Bluefield Water Works v. Public Service Comm'n, 262 U.S. 679 (1923) Bluefield Water

Kali Aerated Water Works Vs. Union of India

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1995(76)ELT265(Mad)

Water Works with respective places in brackets viz., Kali Aerated Water Works (Virudhunagar) in order to distinguish them from one unit 1-4-1977 in the name and style of M/s. Kali Aerated Works at Virudhunagar Trading and Marketing the products manufactured in and

Kali Aerated Water Works, Salem Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Aerated water was started in the name of `Kalimark Aerated Water Works' by the HUF of which M/s. Shri P.V.S. K.Palaniappa factories being run in the name of Kali Aerated Water Works in various parts of Tamil Nadu and discussed the pros