Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 43 offences and penalties Page 23 of about 466 results (0.156 seconds)

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Madras Vs. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC509; [1967]63ITR478(SC); [1967]1SCR761

..... board of director resolved to establish a new spinning unit under the name of sudarsanan spinning mills for each licence was obtained from the government of india under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, in august, 1955. the respondent placed orders for purposes chase of necessary spinning machinery and plant in the months of january and february, 1956. the construction of .....

Walaiti Ram Charan Dass Vs. State of Punjab .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... against the judgment of this court in labha ram and sons and others vs. state of punjab and others1 wherein while interpreting the provisions of the punjab new mandi townships (development and regulation) act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1960), it was held that the government has an obligation to provide sufficient accommodation to all the existing licence dealers ..... after this judgment that the 1999 rules were notified. relevant portion of rule 3 of the 1999 rules reads as follows: 3. sale of plots all plots in the markets developed by the board or committees shall be disposed of by way of open auction or allotment in accordance with the provisions of these rules: provided that the plots will be .....

Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi Vs. Phoenix International Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2007(121)ECC393; 2007(147)LC393(SC); 2007(216)ELT503(SC); JT2007(7)SC189; 2007(11)SCALE332; (2007)10SCC114

..... by the department. in the alternative, it was submitted that even for the sake of argument imports of two companies were clubbed, yet there was no violation of foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992. in reply, m/s. pind stated that the concept of 'skd' did not exist in respect of synthetic shoes; that, in respect of shoes it was ..... :chapter vimports________________________________________________________________________free 22. capital goods, raw materials,importability intermediates, components, consumables, spares, parts, accessories, instruments and other goods may be importedwithout any restriction except to theextent such imports are regulated by thenegative list of imports or any otherprovision of this policy or any other lawfor the time being in force.________________________________________________________________________part ii156. restricted itemsa. consumer goods________________________________________________________________________sl. no. description of items .....

The Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... in the case of shree digvijay cement co.ltd and another vs. union of india and another, air 2003 sc 767. the facts of the said case under the industries (development and regulation) act and the cement control order, 1967 are different and distinct from the facts in the present case. 20. the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the full .....

Willard India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... and paid him between july, 1961 and april 1962 a sum of rs. 60,000. in return, that person agreed to procure manufacturing licence under the provisions of industries (development and regulation) act and a licence or permit for the release of foreign exchange necessary for the import of machinery, plant and equipment for the manufacture of fluorescent tubes. shri mohanlal vyas .....

imperial Electric Trading Co., Aligarh Vs. Industrial Tribunal (ii), U ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1969All242; [1968(17)FLR420]

..... be absurd to say that the manufacture and sale of aluminium-ware is the same as the manufacture of aeroplanes and aeronautical parts.6. under section 2 of the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, the union government is authorised to take under its control the industries specified in the first schedule of the said act. a clear distinction is made in .....

Ajanta Tubes Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT110; 1988(15)ECC83; 1987(32)ELT470(Del); 1988RLR103

..... mills and others v. union of india and others', : [1984]3scr676 . in the first case the supreme court had dealt with the provisions of section 18-aa of industries (development and regulation) act, 1951. it was noticed that the said provision did not provide for any show cause notice or hearing but the supreme court held that the provision does not expressly .....

C.T.O. (Ae) Vs. Marudhara Motors

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1430; (2009)12VatReporter17

..... was the fixation of fair price of motor cars under the provisions of motor car (distribution and sale) control (amendment) order 1969 promulgated under section 18g of the industries (development and regulation) act 1951, which was challenged inter alia on the ground that the cost and expenses on account of warranty and statutory bonus have been wrongly excluded from the ex-works .....

Cwp No.21899 of 2012 (O and M) Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... management cell constituted under the punjab mining minerals rules, 2013 and the sailesh ranjan 2013.08.30 16:27 i attest to the accuracy and minerals development and regulation act, 1957. integrity of this document cwp no.21899 of 2012 (o & m) -4- counsel for state of punjab submits that requisite notification ..... counsel for the pollution control board, to order that a meeting of the principal secretaries, department of industries, science, technology and environment, department of housing and development, the director, town and country planning, the chairman, pollution control board and the principal secretary, irrigation department, be convened, to reconsider the citing parameters ..... by these stone crushing units from the concerned department. the state of punjab is directed to file an affidavit placing on record relevant rules and regulations that permit installation of stone crushers in river bed/choes or in their catchment areas. . concern was shown by this court that such like .....

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. in the High Court of Pu ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to it. by referring to rule 9 of the chandigarh (sale of sites and buildings) rules, 1960 (for short, the rules) framed under section 22 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952 (for short, the act) and schedule-i, appended to the rules, the learned senior counsel representing the petitioner, has argued that sale and charging of batteries is .....