Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 43 offences and penalties Page 22 of about 466 results (0.078 seconds)

Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. T.P. Khaitan

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas28(Delhi); 25(1984)DLT120; ILR1984Delhi688

..... had to be closed. 4. since the public demand for vegetable ghee was increasing, the government stepped in on november 3, 1972, under the industries (development and regulation) act. certain authorised persons under that act took over the management of the company from the earlier board of management and actively made efforts to rehabilitate it ..... the difficult financial position through which the company has been passing. 5. the company continues to be under the management of persons authorised under the industrial (development and regulation) act, and it is this body which mr. khanna is at present representing. the maximum period for which the notification under that enactment can remain ..... continue to have a hold. rather it is more the investment of the public money in the form of shares which ushers in the growth and development of the company. for the managerial capacities, the persons concerned are duly paid their emoluments, and they are not essentially removed or themselves leave on .....

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi-ii Vs. Rajindra Flour and Alli ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1981]128ITR402(Delhi)

..... position that emerges is that when the assessed-company was setting up the factory initially, there was no requirement to get an industrial license under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951. on 21st june, 1963, this policy was altered. if the assessed-company had started the business within three months of that notification, there ..... . it would appear that up to 21st june, 1963, there was no bar to setting up a flour mill without any industrial license under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951. however, by notification published in the gazette of india on 25th june, 1963, there was a change in policy. after that date, an ..... electrical energy charges' before the commencement of the business represent an element of actual cost of machinery, plant and buildings of the assessed and as such depreciation and development rebate are admissible with reference to these amounts also.' 3. for 1966-67 : 'whether, in the circumstances of the case, income from the lease of .....

J.Joshuva Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Court : Chennai

..... notice; and that the assistant geologist (mines), tirunelveli himself has no jurisdiction to inspect the mines, survey and measure the mines, since under section 24 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (for short, "the act"), it only authorises the central government or any person authorised by it to inspect the mines or by the state government by general ..... in g.o.ms.no.63, industries (mma.1), dated 11.5.2005, which is as follows: "under sub-section (1) of section 24 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (central act 67 of 1957), the governor of tamil nadu hereby authorises the following officers for the purpose of the said section of the said act, namely:-(1 .....

Sri Gopal Hanumantha Kase Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... supra) had been on an entirely different set of facts and grounds, where the complainant concerned had exhausted all the remedies under the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and before the high court and thereafter, went on to agitate the same rights in the guise of lodging complaint to the authorities. it ..... , as made by the upalokayukta-1, karnataka state; the entrustment order dated 07.12.2017, as issued by the government of karnataka in its urban development department; and the article of charges dated 04.01.2018, as issued by the additional registrar of enquiries-9, karnataka lokayukta. it is contended that the ..... commissioner, city municipal council, jamkhandi, bagalkot district-587 301. (by sri m.s. bhagwat, advocate) ... petitioner and:1. the state of karnataka department of urban development, represented by its principal secretary, vikasa soudha, bangalore-560 001.-. 2 - w.p.no.5674/2018 2. the karnataka lokayuktha represented by its registrar, m.s.building .....

Bharat Aluminium Company Limited and ors. Vs. Sukumar Mukherjee and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT60(HC),[1999(81)FLR52],(1999)ILLJ828Cal

..... the said company. on or about 1.5.78, the management of the said undertaking was taken over by the appellant company in terms of section 18aa of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951. parliament there after enacted the aluminium corporation of india limited (acquisition and transfer of aluminium undertaking) act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the said act), whereby and ..... duty without leave (not being absence in respect of which an order treating the absence as break in service has been passed in accordance with the standing orders, rules or regulations governing the employee of the establishment), lay-off, strike or a lockout or cessation of work not due to any fault of the employee, whether such uninterrupted or interrupted service .....

V.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1974P& H21

..... , where the chakki installed by the petitioners is functioning. respondent no. 2 was not, therefore, a person aggrieved within the meaning of section 10(2) of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, and could not agitate the matter in appeal before the chief administrator.'3. against the decision of the chief commissioner, v. k. jain filed the writ petition .....

Sat Pal Verma Vs. Smt. Paramjit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR732

..... ground that the defendant had 'started using the premises for running an academy/school/college.....' which was not permissible under the rules and the provisions of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, and the rules made thereunder. it was specifically pleaded that the premises had been let out for the purpose of residence. the defendant had filed a written .....

Willard India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. (Dy. Cit V. ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1997)58TTJ(Del)369

..... and paid him between july, 1961 and april 1962 a sum of rs. 60,000. in return, that person agreed to procure manufacturing license under the provisions of industries (development and regulation) act and a license or permit for the release of foreign exchange necessary for the import of machinery, plant and equipment for the manufacture of fluorescent tubes. shri mohanlal vyas .....

Bhalchandra Dharmajee Makaji and ors. Vs. Alcock, Ashdown and Co. Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1972]42CompCas190(Bom)

..... workers employed by the company are experienced and skilled workers in ship building and ship repair. the government of india have issued an order under section 15 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, appointing a committee for the purpose of making a full and complete investigation into the substantial fall in the volume of production in respect of articles manufactured ..... its annexures. 12. this order shall be without prejudice to the rights of the central government to take over the management of the company under section 18a of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, or under any other law empowering the central government in that behalf. 13. costs of this hearing reserved.

Nav Bharat Corporation Vs. Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas518(AP)

..... government contained in appendix i to the industrial policy revolution, 1948. in doing so, the supreme court also considered the policy resolutions and the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, and observed that the activity of producing chemicals and fertilisers is deemed by the state to be an industry of vital public interest whose ..... , are included in the definition of 'state'. the expression 'or other authorities' has come up for interpretation by the courts on numerous occasions. with the development in modern times of the role of the welfare state, the activities of the state are not confined to the traditional functions. the state has to expand ..... of the petitioner de hors article 14, which is not attracted as the first respondent is not 'state'. no statutory provision is placed before me which regulates awarding of contracts and imposes an obligation on the first respondent to consider all the tenders received by it fairly without discrimination. the first respondent is, .....