Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 section 4 registration of warehouses Court: chennai Page 2 of about 51 results (1.849 seconds)

South India Exports Rep. by Its Partner Mr. Indermal Ramani Vs. the Jo ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(91)ECC555; (2004)1MLJ489

..... . 2. all the petitioners are the export-oriented units. the government of india has formulated an export-import policy under sec. 3 of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the 'foreign trade act'). under the said policy, concessions were given for imports as well as exports. on the ..... customs department was thoroughly justified and had the jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into the matter. in paragraph 21 even the power of adjudication under foreign trade regulation act. then import and export (control) act, was referred to by the learned judge and it was held that though there was an authority for confiscation ..... high court to appraise us of the facts involved therein. that was also a case where the petitioner had the manufacturing advance licence under the foreign trade regulation act and exim policy and there also, the customs authorities had issued the summons to the petitioner to furnish the details about the transactions. the learned .....

P.Mariadoss Vs. the District Collector.

Court : Chennai

..... accordance with g.o.ms.no.63. the government of tamil nadu in exercise of its power conferred under section 24 (1) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, authorised the following officers for the purpose of the said section of the said act:-1. all the district collectors including chennai district within their ..... alleged violation of illicit mining, under rule 36a of the tamil nadu minor mineral concession rules, 1959 r/w section 21(1) of the mines and minerals (regulations and development) act, 1957. the 3rd respondent in turn issued a show cause notice dated 28.09.2010 asking the petitioner to submit his explanation within 7 days. on ..... the question which was referred to a larger bench of the supreme court, doubting the legality and validity of the direction issued in madhuri patil vs. commissioner, tribal development (1994) 6 scc 241, the direction contained in paragraph 13 of the judgment of the two judges bench of the supreme court in madhuri patil's case was .....

Union of India Vs. Anglo-french Textiles Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas489(Mad)

..... .1. the applicant is the union of india, represented by the secretary, department of textiles, ministry of commerce, new delhi. the application is laid under s. 15a of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). 2. it is now well-publicised that m/s. anglo-french textiles ltd., mudaliarpet, pondicherry, had closed its business; that 7 .....

Tamil Nadu Spinning Mills Association Rep. by Its Chief Advisor K. Ven ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR501]; (2008)ILLJ583Mad

..... as the powers under section 27 of the act are concerned, the inclusion of the textile industry as item 23 in the schedule i to the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 does not make it as one established under the authority of the central government and the inclusion of the textile mills in the said act ..... 'appropriate government' contained in section 2(b) and also in view of the fact that the textile industry is included in the first schedule to the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, the 'appropriate government' in respect of the textile industry is the central government and thus, the impugned notification issued by the state government is without ..... intended to apply this act not to all industries but to those industries only where by reason of unorganized labour or want of proper arrangements for effective regulation of wages or for other causes the wages of labourers in a particular industry were very low. it is with an eye to these facts that the .....

Chennai Yettrumathi Valaga Uzhiyargal Matrum Pothu Thozhilalar Sangam, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2010]156CompCas1(Mad)

..... bonded central government industrial asset, taken on lease by 100% export oriented industrial units and their occupation is regulated by public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. it is also governed by foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992 and the special economic zones act, 2005 and the statutory rules made thereunder.10. in ..... sarfaesi act and properties have also been sold and sale certificates have been issued in favour of third parties.11. the third respondent viz., the industrial development bank of india, had filed its counter taking the legal plea that the wages to the workmen and other dues if any, are the liability of ..... m/s. nova electro magnetics limited.3. the said company became sick and sought a reference before the bifr, which appointed the third respondent viz., industrial development bank of india (idbi), as the operating agency to examine the viability of the proposals and for formulation of a scheme for rehabilitation. the bifr vide .....

Shrishti Digital Solution Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

..... of the goods under section 111(d) of the customs act, 1962 read with sections 3(2) and 11(1) of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992 is bad. the finding with regard to prior permission from ministry of environment and forest also does not apply in view of the ..... of the subject goods under section 111(d) of the customs act, 1962 read with sec 3(2) and sec 11(1) of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992. (d) i hold that the subject goods which had been imported without prior permission from ministry of environment & forests (moef) are ..... packaging machinery and equipment refractories for initial lining, refrigeration equipment, power generating sets, machine tools, catalysts for initial charge, equipment and instruments for testing, research and development, quality and pollution control. capital goods may be for use in manufacturing, mining, agriculture, aquaculture, animal husbandry, floriculture, horticulture, pisciculture, poultry, sericulture and .....

Madras Machine Tools Manufacturers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1975]98ITR119(Mad)

..... . we are also not inclined to accept the contention of the revenue that the articles produced or manufactured need not be the articles licensed under the industries development and regulation act, 1951, and that any article produced by the undertaking will entitle the company to claim the benefit of section 84 in the year of such production ..... objects, the object of the undertaking is only to manufacture lathes and bench grinders as- is clear from the licence issued to the company under the industries development and regulation act, 1951. it is not in dispute in this case that the lathes and bench grinders were produced only subsequent to may 31, 1958, and not ..... the following reason for making a single assessment in respect of the above two accounting periods :' as the machinery has started functioning early and the assessee claimed development rebate in respect of the machinery previously installed even for the first period there will only be a loss and in the second period also, there is .....

The Management of M. Jeewanlal (1929) Limited, Proprietors of Mysore P ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1975)2MLJ143

..... the mysore premier metal factory and the change of ownership was recognised by the government of india separately for the rolling mills and the utensils manufacturing section under the industries (development regulation) act, 1951. after such acquisition it was found that the machinery and the equipment in the rolling mills were far from trouble-free and required repairs, overhauling and replacement. the ..... the business or activities of an employer would be covered by the section. the supreme court had referred to two of its earlier decisions in. workmen of indian leaf tobacco development company limited v. management : [1969]2scr282 , where the closure of eight out of the twenty-one depots of the company was held to be a closure within the meaning of .....

Rani, Age-50, Vs. 1.State Represented By,

Court : Chennai

..... . on the materials placed before me, i am satisfied that thiru.bennet @ nanuthoonki is committing grave crimes in violation of the provisions of the tamil nadu mines and minerals development and regulation act 1957 and tamil nadu mines and minerals concession rule 1959 is also acting in a manner jeopardizing public peace and public order and as such thiru.bennet @ nanuthooki is ..... sections 341, 294(b), 506(ii) ipc; 353, 294(b), 506(i) ipc and sec. 4(1-a) r/w sec.21(1) of tamil nadu mines and minerals development and regulation act 1957 and section 36(a) of tamil nadu mines and minerals concession rule 1959; 294(b), 336, 323, 506(i) ipc; 294(b), 324 ipc and 341, 294(b .....

G. Ramanikumar, President, State Legal Cell, Bharathiya Janatha Party ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ366

..... prevented any hardship to the students studying in their institutions and also showed their bonafide in not disrupting any academic activities. it is in the light of these developments, the present writ petitions have been posted for final hearing.8. we have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have perused the records.9 ..... such a manner as to denigrate another religion or bring about dissatisfaction amongst people.para 83: article 25(2) gives specific power to the state to make any law regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity, which may be associated with religious practice as provided by sub-clause ( a ) of article 25 ..... the other provisions of part iii of the constitution. this would mean that the right given to a person under article 25(1) can be curtailed or regulated if the exercise of that right would violate other provisions of part iii of the constitution, or if the exercise thereof is not in consonance with public order .....