Court : Chennai Madurai
..... stated among other things, about the appointment of mrs.r.lalitha, that, in the personnel committee meeting held on 11.04.87, in which commissioner for milk production and dairy development has participated, it was resolved to appoint mrs.r.lalitha who was working in pudukottai dcmpu in sivagangai dcmpu on permanent basis. however, the collector has concluded in his remarks ..... .04.87, that it was resolved to appoint her by the personnel committee which was chaired by mr.karuppan, i.a.s., the then commissioner for milk production and dairy development. in the appointment order issued by the then managing director, sivagangai dcmpu on 17.07.1987, it was also mentioned clearly that in the letter dated 17.12.1986 of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... cited by the 4th respondent as stated above is that the petitioner not qualified in tet examination. the learned counsel would further contend that in the subsequent development, government order, namely, g.o.ms.no.181 school education (c2) department dated 15.11.2011 requiring the qualification of the tet as one of ..... chennai and others v. s.jeyalakshmi and others, the division bench has declared that the government cannot insist upon the minority institution to abide by any regulation framed under the provisions of the right to information act. the relevant portion of the judgment is reproduced hereunder for better appreciation: 59.insofar as minority institutions ..... are concerned, the contention of the learned senior counsel appearing for the minority schools is that when tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act 1973 received the assent of the president of india and it is still in force, it cannot be supplanted by an executive order, namely, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... employees and their supervisors". (see : personnel management by dr. udai pareek p. 277). there cannot be any modern management much less any career planning, man-power development, management development etc. which is not related to a system of promotions. (see : management of personnel in indian enterprises by prof. n.n. chatterjee, chap. 12 p. ..... management by flipo edwin b. 4th ed. p. 246). every management must provide realistic opportunities for promising employees to move upward. "the organization that fails to develop a satisfactory procedure for promotion is bound to pay a severe penalty in terms of administrative costs, mis-allocation of personnel, low morale, and ineffectual performance, among ..... in the decision reported in 1994 (2) scc 24 (referred to supra), the hon'ble supreme court has held as follows:- 7. that clause (2) of regulation 3 has application to sub-clause (a) of clause (1); that is to say, clause (2) sets out the eligibility criteria of employees working as executive .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... committee, comprising of the third respondent herein / district collector, as the chairman and the assistant director of town panchayats and the p.a., to the collector (development), as members. the proposal was sent, vide rc.no.22250/2010/p2, dated 21.09.2010 by the third respondent and the said proposal was recommended by ..... for promotion. therefore, the government had provincialized the post of junior assistant in panchayat union service from 01.04.1979. by g.o.ms.no.863, rural development department, dated 23.11.1990, 10% of the vacancies in the post of junior assistants, rural welfare assistants grade ii and cashiers were earmarked for promotion ..... proceedings dated 16.12.2010 to the first respondent. the government had sent the proposal to the fourth respondent, for its concurrence, as per proviso to regulation 16 (b) of the tnpsc regulations, 1954. 12. when the undisputed facts stood, as stated supra, the fourth respondent, vide letter, dated 05.12.2013, had conveyed its concurrence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... said joint commissioner confiscated the goods valued at rs.16,17,300/- under section 111(d) (i) of the customs act read with section 3(3) of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992. however, the joint commissioner has imposed a penalty of rs.1,50,000/- under section 112(a) of the customs act by its order, dated 29.06 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... commissioner confiscated the goods valued at rs.9,88,000/- under section 111(d) and (i) of the customs act read with section 3(3) of the foreign trade (development and regulation) act, 1992. however, the joint commissioner has allowed the petitioner to redeem and re-export the goods on payment of redemption fine of rs.3,50,000/- and imposed a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... notice dated 25.11.2004 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the second respondent for fresh consideration, who shall take note of the subsequent developments pertaining to the sale of goods, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass fresh orders on merits and in accordance with law, ..... .2002, by stating that the petitioner cleared the consignment as project contract, but they failed to produce the required documents as per section 7 of the project import regulations,1986 for finalisation of the project. therefore, the demand of rs.1,10,000/- was confirmed with interest under section 28 (2) of the act. 3. ..... and agitators for fabrication and supply of leaching purification plant to tamil nadu magnesite ltd. the petitioner/importer filed a bill of entry for warehousing the goods and accordingly the goods were warehoused. it appears that the goods were not cleared, because the project did not take off and in the meantime, the petitioner also shifted .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... the arbitrator even with regard to construction of a contract, if it is a possible view of the matter." (v) in (2009) 5 scc 142 (kwality manufacturing corporation vs. central warehousing corporation), the hon'ble supreme court has held as follows: "the scope of interference by courts in regard to arbitral awards is limited. a court considering an application under section ..... the statutory legal position, the court would be justified in interfering with the award of the arbitrator." (vii). in (2001) 5 scc 691 (indu engineering and textiles ltd., v. delhi development authority), the hon'ble supreme court has held that the arbitral award can be set aside on the following grounds: (a) violation of principles of natural justice in passing the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... the arbitrator even with regard to construction of a contract, if it is a possible view of the matter." (v) in (2009) 5 scc 142 (kwality manufacturing corporation vs. central warehousing corporation), the hon'ble supreme court has held as follows: "the scope of interference by courts in regard to arbitral awards is limited. a court considering an application under section ..... the statutory legal position, the court would be justified in interfering with the award of the arbitrator." (vii). in (2001) 5 scc 691 (indu engineering and textiles ltd., v. delhi development authority), the hon'ble supreme court has held that the arbitral award can be set aside on the following grounds: (a)violation of principles of natural justice in passing the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... regard, proposals were forwarded by the 5th respondent herein, viz., joint director/ project officer, pudukottai to the 2nd respondent herein viz., the director of rural development and panchayat raj. the 3rd respondent herein viz., the district collector, pudukottai, has also forwarded the proposals to the 2nd respondent and the same was ..... rejecting the petitioners' claim for regularization. he would nextly point out that before passing the impugned order, the 1st respondent has not taken into consideration the development made in the other departments, viz., the services of the persons, who have completed ten years of service in almost all departments, were regularized, ..... respect of two persons, viz., m.selvaraj and umayal, who are employed for the livelihood project on consolidated pay, in dharmapuri district, controlled by rural development through drda, funds allotted by government of india, their services were not regularized and hence, they have filed w.p.nos. 3571, 3572 and 5975 .....
Tag this Judgment!