Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: warehousing development and regulation act 2007 chapter vi powers and functions of authority Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 1,004 results (0.390 seconds)

Jul 30 2024 (SC)

Yash Developers Vs. Harihar Krupa Co Operative Housing Society Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... too farfetched to read such draconian rights available to the managing committee or to general body of a society without any regulation, supervision and control of the sra to change the developer. the sra has all the powers not only to regulate and control such situations but to take a decision as to what is in the 8 2019 scc online bom 3896 ..... (2) of the slums act that a slum society at its sole discretion and/or without any control and regulations by sra can change the developer. if such a course of action is made permissible, considering the hard realities and the hundreds of developers being available to take over such schemes, it would create a chaos and it is likely that a situation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2023 (SC)

Ifb Agro Industries Limited Vs. Sicgil India Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of the total paid-up share capital of the appellant. this individual crossing of 5% by respondent no.1 triggered the sebi (pit) regulations. regulation 1310 thereof provides that if any person acquires more than 5% shares of a company, then it shall make a disclosure to the acquiree company ..... the interest of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market. this court had the occasion ..... of 31 authority of india20, insurance regulatory and development authority21, insolvency and bankruptcy board of india22, central23 and state24 electricity regulatory commissions and airport economic regulatory authority25, are some of the regulators established under their respective statutes. the sebi26 is one such regulator.29. sebi was established in 1988 to protect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 2020 (HC)

Securities Exchange Board Of India Vs. Franklin Templeton Trustees Ser ...

Court : Karnataka

..... interest of the state, to control the affairs and management of the private companies. care is taken in regard to the industries covered under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 that their production, which is important for the economy, may not go down, yet the business activity is carried on by such companies or ..... subject to the provisions of this act, it shall be the duty of the board to protect the interest of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market, by such measures as it thinks fit. (2) without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the measures referred to ..... same has been enacted to provide for the establishment of a board (sebi) to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 152158. section 3 of sebi act provides for establishment of sebi. chapter-iv of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Jayshree Gururaj Vs. Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited, through it ...

Court : Karnataka

..... would be helping in generating additional economic activities, promoting of export of goods and services, investment from domestic and foreign sources, creation of employment opportunities, development of infrastructural facilities, but such entrepreneurs or private companies cannot be termed as persons or companies engaged in discharging public functions or governmental functions. 30. ..... state government or by any person jointly or severally for manufacturing of goods or rendering services or for both or as a free trade and warehousing zone. interested person intending to set up such economic zone can make a proposal to the state government concerned. the board to whom the ..... carrying out its business activities. the respondent company is a private company. composition of the company and its management is not, in any manner, regulated or controlled by the central or the state government or by its undertakings. the chairman, vice-chairman and managing director of the company are required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2016 (HC)

Ms Jayshree Gururaj Vs. Cisco Systems (India)private Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... in generating additional economic activities, promoting of export of goods and services, wp197262015 22 investment from domestic and foreign sources, creation of employment opportunities, development of infrastructural facilities, but such entrepreneurs or private companies cannot be termed as persons or companies engaged in discharging public functions or governmental functions.30. ..... state government or by any person jointly or severally for manufacturing of goods or rendering services or for both or as a free trade and warehousing zone. interested person intending to set up such economic zone can make a proposal to the state government concerned. the board to whom the ..... carrying out its business activities. the respondent company is a private company. composition of the company and its management is not, in any manner, regulated or controlled by the central or the state government or by its undertakings. the chairman, vice-chairman and managing director of the company are required .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2014 (HC)

Trip Communication Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... clearance on a application by the importer , where goods cannot be cleare d within a reasonable ======================================================================= time (section49) or warehoused in a public or private warehouse (section 60, 61).31. the regulation 6(1)(l) of hcca r lays down as under:8. responsibilities of custom cargo service provider: (1) the custom ..... functions under the act. interest granted functions of aai, for overall public some of its functions, being the operating, maintaining, developing, designing, construction, upgradation, modern isation, finances and managing the airport to the delhi international airport private limited, (dial for short) under the operation, ..... management and developing agreements (omda) dated 4.4.2006 which agreement further empowers dial to sub contract any activity covered by om da.34. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2008 (SC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

..... bodies, such as those connected with providing amenities to the inhabitants of the locality, like health and education services, water and sewerage, town planning and development, roads, markets, transportation, social welfare services etc. etc. broadly we may say that they may be entrusted with the performance of civic duties and ..... the market area and the market, and weighment, delivery of and payment for, such agricultural produce;explanation - for the purposes of clause (g) the word `regulate' shall include - (i) making, carrying out, enforcing or canceling of nay contract of sale of a notified agricultural produce; (ii) conducting or supervising of ..... counsel there is no merit in these civil appeals.22. before analyzing the submissions made, we quote hereinbelow the relevant sections of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1998 which read as under:chapter ipreliminary 2. definitions -(1) in this act, unless the context otherwise requires, (c) ' board' means the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2008 (HC)

The Tata Power Company Limited (Formerly Known as Tata Electric Compan ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR692; 2008(6)BomCR152; (2008)110BOMLR1500; 2008(6)MhLj635

..... of directorate, this is what has been mentioned in chapter i. functions and organization.2. functions2.1 functions of the directorate in the context of the industrial development in the state can be broadly divided into two categories:i) promotional.(ii) regulatory.for obvious reason, the government has been very keen to see that industrial ..... directorate of industries as also the affidavit clearly indicate that the requirement of registration with the directorate of industries is not backed by any statutory rule or regulation. it is only a procedure that has to be followed. the affidavit filed by the joint director of industries also indicates that there is lot of ..... registered with the directorate of industries upto 01.10.2006. thereafter, the registration procedure has been done away with by the micro small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 came into force with effect from 02/10/2006.it is stated in the said affidavit that no other industry was registered with the directorate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2007 (HC)

Mrs. Asha Anilkumar Kataria Sole Proprietor of Kat Stocks Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR355; III(2008)BC149; 2007(5)BomCR125; (2007)109BOMLR1273; 2007(4)MhLj149; [2008]81SCL477(Bom)

..... of section 11, it is evident that it is the duty of the board to protect the interest of investors in securities and to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market by measures as it thinks fit. some of the measures those can be taken by the board are enlisted in sub-section ..... of a board to protect the interest of the investors in securities and to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market. the s.c. regulation act, 1956 is aimed at preventing undesirable transactions in securities, by regulation of business therein. taking into consideration this nature of the agreement of the act and after ..... are not having registration certificate. although anilkumar had volunteered during his oral evidence that he had applied for registration certification and paid registration fees as required by regulation, 1992, learned judge seems to have disbelieved him on that count, because no documentary evidence is placed on record to support such a contention. this was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2007 (TRI)

Karvy Stock Broking Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2007)73SCL261SAT

..... even the preventive or punitive measures.without doubt, these, too, are ultimately aimed at achieving the basic objectives of investor protection and promotion of the development and regulation of the securities market as contained in the preamble.21. the question whether the term inquiry referred to in section 11 also includes the inquiry under ..... subject to the provisions of this act, it shall be the duty of the board to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market, by such measures as it thinks fit. (2) without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions, the measures referred to therein ..... which finds mention in this chapter provides that the duty of the board is to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of and to regulate the securities market by such measures as it thinks fit. the words in italics indicate the width of power conferred on the board by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //